I mean if you’re technologically illiterate or clueless about the spending habits of people who possess actual brains then it’s like some blue ocean where everyone in the world will switch to playing streaming games via smart TV and smartphones.
For the rest of us, it’s mainly a bit of a cash grab to exploit idiots.
They're looking at console input lag on a chart and thinking that users don't notice it or don't care.
Added input lag from TVs, wireless controllers, x86 flaws, game flaws - it's no big deal.
A tiny segment of the gaming world really cares about input lag and everybody else just smiles and enjoys whatever they get.
Most of the 'innovation' that's objectively changed the way game consoles work without really improving the gaming experience has come at the expense of added input lag.
Trading real-time CRTs for laggy flat screens, near lag free wired DualShock2 for the lag ridden DualShock3 - input lag could loosely be equated with 'progress'.
Given that premise, the idea of adding even more lag while reducing the upfront buy-in cost for a platform sounds like something that the average idiot will jump at.