Very end game spoilersIMO the phantom's face swaps are much more nightmare fuel inducing, Prof. Means head on that body? No thank you.
Ehh, I find the former more nightmarish. It's like the comparison with (spoiler about 999)
999 Clover
Very end game spoilersIMO the phantom's face swaps are much more nightmare fuel inducing, Prof. Means head on that body? No thank you.
That's a terrible spoiler lead-in. You make people think you're still talking about AA5 but bring up a different game entirely.
No
Don't go there Ace Attorney
Don't do it
Don't tell me 5-5 Trial spoilersAthena tried to "fix" her mommy after she died by putting her on the robot table
feels I don't want D:
Edit: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
No
Don't go there Ace Attorney
Don't do it
Don't tell me 5-5 Trial spoilersAthena tried to "fix" her mommy after she died by putting her on the robot table
feels I don't want D:
Edit: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I'm thinking I'm gonna replay Case 3.
I think if I were to replay any case in the game (which I will eventually), it'd be this one. By far my favorite case.
i reallly think they needa get away from 'you can't progress from this cross examination until you press every statement'.
I do it anyways, but sometimes you accidentally skip one and you are stuck because everything you pressent is wrong.
i reallly think they needa get away from 'you can't progress from this cross examination until you press every statement'.
I do it anyways, but sometimes you accidentally skip one and you are stuck because everything you pressent is wrong.
i reallly think they needa get away from 'you can't progress from this cross examination until you press every statement'.
I do it anyways, but sometimes you accidentally skip one and you are stuck because everything you pressent is wrong.
i reallly think they needa get away from 'you can't progress from this cross examination until you press every statement'.
I do it anyways, but sometimes you accidentally skip one and you are stuck because everything you pressent is wrong.
I can only think of one time in this game where you were truly forced to press all 4? statements before the game moved on and even then I think you got a bit of info after each one. It really shouldn't have been a testimony it was basically an evidence dump in the form of a cross examination. Not sure if it was case 3 or case 4 that happened.
Is there ever a cross-examination in AA5 that actually requires the player to press the witness on every statement?
Is there ever a cross-examination in AA5 that actually requires the player to press the witness on every statement?
Ah right, I think one cross-examination involving Fulbright just to get more information concerning the case. I'm fine with that.
So Bolt and other Japanese AA players, how does the DLC case compare to the other cases in this game?
It might be my favorite, honestly. Great new characters, a fun setting, investigation is a bit more varied than the rest of the cases, a good mystery, and a surprisingly strong overarching plot. In some ways it feels like the team let themselves cut loose a bit with it, which is great (DD is a strong game, but it feels very structured and reactionary in some ways.)
Isn't that how most of the "detective" testimonies go? First time around is just evidence dump and pressing, then second go around has a contradiction?
Well as I'm pretty sure you're the person way back in the day who got me top play these games you've got me excited for this DLC case. Here's hoping it gets localized soon!
Yes, I realized I had the twitch highlights really late, rushed to hit perceive, but it wasn't highlighting any part of the statement anymore.what, on apollo's perceive?
Now this one I did catch!Aha, caught a Katamari Damashii reference too. Oh these guys.
*brofist*dragonlife said:Wait... people don't press everything? I sure as hell do, without question; I want to absorb every damn line of text I can in this series. That's why my game time is so padded.
Same. I must read every line I can find, and that's why I was so angry initially with how streamlined they made the investigations in this game. By the start of Case 3 my activity log had me at over 15hrs playtime.Wait... people don't press everything? I sure as hell do, without question; I want to absorb every damn line of text I can in this series. That's why my game time is so padded.
DLC covers Phoenix Wright's first case after regaining his lawyer's badge, in which he must defend a whale charged with murder.
I'm fine with those. There's only a certain amount of ways they can keep the cross examinations fresh, after all.
The worst ones were ones were ones where you had to press a statement, then press one EARLIER in the testimony. I remember that happening in at least JFA and T&T, maybe other games, too.
Oh god, these are definitely my least favourite. Press Statement 3 > Press Statement 4 > Press Statement 3 ughh. I don't think there's been a case where you had to do this and I DIDN'T end up using a guide to figure it out. >.<
I'm also on #TeamPressEveryStatement.
They really should turn it around, stop giving such 'hard cases for the lawyers'. Give a case that is seemingly a easy defense, but the genius prosecutor thinks outside of the box forcing you into a corner.
On that note.
I don't know why I clicked this thread, I haven't read anything about this game or any earlier pages, but this post reminded me.
I've downloaded this game but have yet to play it. Are there any really tricky parts like this, or is it mostly presenting evidence?
Like I think there was one part in a game where they were like "who could've done this" and you had to present a person and then they asked "what piece of evidence relates to that person" and you had to present evidence and it was just terrible trying to come up with exactly what they wanted from so many possible combinations.
Anything like that?