RIP
RNH and Barrylocke, and welcome, Drago (even though you find me suspicious)!
Sorry for my D1 inactivity. I'm typically a low-activity player, but yeah, that was beyond the norm. Real-life took over, from Valentine's Day to our anniversary and a significant family agent, and I didn't have time to read, much less post. I was able to catch up during the night, though. Here's something I wrote prior to D2 start; day starts for me at 6am on a Sunday so I was asleep when we found out we lost two towns. Comments in square brackets have been made post-D2 dawn.
The trick is that ScraftyDevil is also confirmed town for the town as well. The mafia thrives in murky situations, so its often best to leave suspicious town players alive that may get town voted later. A confirmed townie is basically the opposite of that.
True. [My sole interaction in the game : ( Barrylocke was pretty insightful, so that could have led to his death. But I'm inclined to believe that unless scum have the insane power to kill twice in one night, RNH was the night kill target.
This was a very risky telegraph.]
As mentioned by others, I was a little thrown off by this interaction between StanleyPalmtree and CornBurrito:
*drinks coffee*
mourning everybody,
i see we are off to a hell of a rolling start today!
Im all for a day 1 lynch, accusations and self-defense leaves a lot of material from all party's to be used later, and if this follows the spirit of Ace Attorney, we will be wanting as much evidence as we can get.
That said i wont be supporting the idea of blindly following whoever scrafty votes for, blind votes means no justification, which means no material to build a case on later. (also it would be as boring as iced tea).
Between the avatar, the intentional typo, and the use of the word "hell" I think you may actually be scum that is deliberately fucking with town. Knowing that nobody will take an early post like this seriously.
Granted, I've never played with either of you before, but to nitpick on such a little thing-- and especially the word "hell"-- seemed like an overreaction. I mean, I know that we barely have anything to go on on D1, but man. I'd like to know what raised your hackles so quickly, CornBurrito. Your analysis of that post was WIFOM to the next level.
Squidy also replied to it.
Incidentally, is there something about StanleyPalmtree that I'm missing? As well as Xam? Are they like Crab?
I'm also wary about leaning so heavily on the AA flavor as a whole. Sorian did say that this game disregards canon deaths. That said, I'd wager that we do have an (Miles) Edgeworth, a Phoenix, and a Gumshoe, given what Sorian's said in the flavor text so far. But who knows if they're actually power roles-- Gregory Edgeworth and Pearl have no special skills whatsoever, apart from Pearl's being outed so early. [D: Nick and Edgeworth. This further lends credence to roles named in the flavor, but that's likely accurate for names only, and not necessarily alignment/powers.]
Now that Kalor's been lynched, let's take a look at where this came from, and who had most to gain from that happening.
After Hipster's
revenge vote on Kalor ([which I'm disregarding because he's new), the first person who drew significant attention to Kalor was roytheone, in
his reads post here.
However, I do also agree with roy about CornBurrito, though, having noticed it myself in my reread. From his seeming-like-filler role speculation to his Barrylocke vote, and especially the overreaction to StanleyPalmtree's opening post. Trying to make something out of nothing. Granted, it could be another Barrylocke vote situation where CB is trying to gauge reactions (which I've evidently fallen for), but again, it rubbed me the wrong way.
This may have colored my perception of the exchange between Zeke and CB-- Zeke didn't seem that defensive to me. I'm not sure which is bias and which is an accurate read, because I've played with Zeke before. (Sorry for bringing a previous game into this) He was Archer, but was seen to act suspicious then too.
Obviously, this is all a (late) read of D1, so it's mostly gut feelings and reactions to interactions. I'll happily eat my words should it turn out that CB was town all along. [Although yeah, with RNH being the sole vote on CB yesterday, if CB were scum, that would have been a stupid play. But with CB's WIFOM style, it could be a possibility.]
Fake edit:
I'd like to know who else read it as potential bread-crumbing at the time.
When I caught up, yep. It seemed tonally contradictory to me (especially with the use of the AA3 sprite of all things), and drew unnecessary attention.
As for the blackmailing, and this is highly flavor-dependent, Shelly de Killer only leaves a card
after he's committed a murder (so that his clients don't get suspected for the death). I wouldn't think it was a portent, but a signature. We had poison in HP. Could it be that? Or is de Killer taking responsibility for one of last night's deaths, and has to leave a card with one of the players (perhaps randomly)?