kvltus lvlzvs
Member
Bloodborne on switch u confirmed
Pretty sure Nintendo will utilize DLSS and shit in the next hardware. Graphics have kinda reached a peak point, and the rendering techniques will only get better. What I'm saying is their next hardware can hold up decently. Not 4k 60fps Horizon graphics mind you but that has never been Nintendos way. Not to mention the Zelda games gets jailbroken (or what the term is) and can run and look pretty good on PC.thats one weak machine. Nintendo will lose out on 3rd party support again.
Nintendos prolly gonna DRM the crud out of Switch 2 whens it releases in 2027Pretty sure Nintendo will utilize DLSS and shit in the next hardware. Graphics have kinda reached a peak point, and the rendering techniques will only get better. What I'm saying is their next hardware can hold up decently. Not 4k 60fps Horizon graphics mind you but that has never been Nintendos way. Not to mention the Zelda games gets jailbroken (or what the term is) and can run and look pretty good on PC.
If you go from nVidia to AMD, you can kiss Backwards Compatibility goodbye. There's no chance in hell that Nintendo will put the time and effort into making that work. That was the biggest reason you don't see BC PS3 games and why it was so hard for the Xbox 360 to emulate Xbox games.That, the Z1. 2.8Tflops in RDNA 3, would be a good hardware for switch 2:
Lmao. Fucking joke machine again.
Even though the idea is nice, as I always wanted portables to have a TV out so I can always play their games on TV, it becomes a problem when they've completely got rid a home only console and you're stuck with this battery-hamstrung hybrid. That is its downside.It's a handheld hibryd. It cant be more powerful without having 30 minutes of battery life.
Even though the idea is nice, as I always wanted portables to have a TV out so I can always play their games on TV, it becomes a problem when they've completely got rid a home only console and you're stuck with this battery-hamstrung hybrid. That is its downside.
It is why I wish they go back to separate dedicated portables and home consoles, but this time share the same game library instead. Portable crowd get their Lites and home console crowd get their power. The home console crowd got shafted imo.
But it's their business so whatever.
If it’s on a par with Steam Deck or a bit more, but gives developers a single platform to develop for and better battery life, with some features like DLSS it should be in a pretty good spot. If they really are carrying over Switch digital purchases too it’s a day 1 purchase for meSo it might be about as powerful as a Steam Deck. Hoping it's stronger than that though, especially if it is still pretty distant in terms of release date.
It’s no secret that a new Nintendo platform has been in the works as the company isn’t going to sit on Switch forever. According to Kotick, it will be close to Gen 8 power – or the PlayStation 4 / Xbox One, in other words.
Kotick has been having email exchanges with Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa. In one message, Kotick mentioned that the Switch successor has “closer alignment of Gen 8 platforms”.
This came about during courtroom proceedings over whether Call of Duty could be ported to Switch or the next Nintendo console. Kotick said in
response:
“Given closer alignment of Gen 8 platforms and our previous offerings on PS4 and Xbox One, it’s reasonable to assume we can make something compelling for NG [next-gen] Switch as well.”
Edit: The title is misleading he just assumes it.
That'll be good enough for a long time. PS4 era was when we really started seeing diminishing returns, so for Nintendo's style, it'll be like giving NASA the DOD's budget.
There's a huge difference between PS4 and Xbox One though. The PS4 was able to push out 1080p/30fps games for most of its life at a high visual IQ, while the Xbox One was a pile of shit. So, really, is it close to PS4 or Xbox One, the difference is material. Also the system would presumably have a much better CPU than either because it's basically impossible not to.
eh expected. Its a portable console afterall.
I guess most games will stay at 30 fps on switch 2.
I expect ps4 pro ish specs (so like 3-4 TF) 1080p on the go OLED and 1440-2160p docked…… games prob will look close to series S visuals if closer to the 4TF number…. Prob $399 at launch.
I think you need to lower your expectations. Half the TFs, half the resolution maybe.I expect ps4 pro ish specs (so like 3-4 TF) 1080p on the go OLED and 1440-2160p docked…… games prob will look close to series S visuals if closer to the 4TF number…. Prob $399 at launch.
With all the people crying over 60FPS and disappointing graphics of this new gen, it's clear nobody can realistically push graphics too far before diminishing returns, and that's literally, because money is not limitless.
I do think the next Switch, and hopefully they won't be stupid and just call it Switch 2, if powerful as PS4 that's totally fine esp if they use DLSS which will help boost it.
I think for most people. Switch is showing it's age, but with a good efficient system, if you can get a God of War looking game on it, i think it'll be fine. Especially since I haven't seen huge leaps with PS5 (to my eyes, yeah, there's prob some nicer stuff, but it's really tiny).Funny enough I still game on PS4 and have a gaming PC better than a PS4 by a wide margin. PS4 graphics still look good to me
I think for most people. Switch is showing it's age, but with a good efficient system, if you can get a God of War looking game on it, i think it'll be fine. Especially since I haven't seen huge leaps with PS5 (to my eyes, yeah, there's prob some nicer stuff, but it's really tiny).
That, the Z1. 2.8Tflops in RDNA 3, would be a good hardware for switch 2:
Why waste silicon when you can use FSR2?Knowing Nintendo that might be with DLSS included, in order to save on die space.
Why waste silicon when you can use FSR2?
My bet it's 1080p console without DLSS.
Low production costs. Low game development costs. All software and tools are ready and mature. Easy to develop for. 4K is a waste in console like this IMO.
Not in 12 years, 9 years. It will be 12 years behind, though.You mean in 12 years we can get ps5 graphics on Switch 3? Sweet.