Don't you dare, DON'T YOU DARE!!!!Considering upcoming games like Spiderman 2 doesn't looks that much different from the PS4 version
Well isn't the Steam deck around this kind of power? So if Nintendo is still making a handled/home console hybrid, it make sense in term of reasonnable battery life.
I’m not a tech guy but I’m pretty sure the CPU would still be way better/more modern than what’s in the Ps4.'Close to PS4' is not even close to good enough; the CPU on those consoles are a complete joke. Yes, I know gameplay is king and it will sell gang busters but, come on, Nintendo can have far better muscle than that and still turn a profit on the hardware.
I don't see that being a con anymore when Switch 2 comes out
Not if you don't care about ports of big games.
I expect ps4 pro ish specs (so like 3-4 TF) 1080p on the go OLED and 1440-2160p docked…… games prob will look close to series S visuals if closer to the 4TF number…. Prob $399 at launch.
Low-powered home console meant 1 gen behind. Low-powered handheld means 1.5-2 gens behind. Welcome to the nightmare aka the new normal.I was hopping for a homeconsole.... Another portable... T_T
I don't care about the specs for the portable side of Switch 2 - assuming it is still a hybrid handheld / console - but I really do hope that Nintendo put some thought into how those Switch 2 games will look on a 4K TV.
The current Switch can look pretty awful at times... well, most of the time actually... on a 55" OLED TV due to the sub-1080p resolutions and lack of support and upscaling for 4K resolutions. I would like to see them include a dock that has an additional chip in it with DLSS support to render the games at a higher visual fidelity and with basics like anisotropic filtering and anti-aliasing, something that is still rare to see in many of Nintendo's own first-party games. The problem is that when you have sub-1080p games rendered with raw stair-step edges and no texture filtering and then you output it at 1080p and then have it upscaled by the TV to 4K then the final image starts to look, quite frankly, a mess unless you sit 20 feet away from the screen or have extremely bad eye-sight!!! Unfortunately, for Nintendo 1080p LCD TVs are no longer as widely available as they used to be and that is what Switch games look best on (CRT would be even better). Nintendo need to catch up with the 21st century really.
I will be extremely disappointed if the Switch 2 is another system targeting 1080p max. for TV usage and 720p for portable gaming. A 1080p OLED screen would be nice to have for the handheld screen and 1440p max. (with hardware upscaling to 4K) for TV use.
P.S. Switch 2 absolutely has to be 100% backwards compatible with current Switch games otherwise I will definitely be giving it a miss.
Because nintendo treat their hardware as toys.Closer to Xbox One than Series X.
Edit: Misread, thought they were talking about Switch...
That's fucking terrible, why have a weak ass console like that?
Psssst.... consoles are toys.Because nintendo treat their hardware as toys.
Nope its a battleground.Psssst.... consoles are toys.
What did we learn about teraflops?hehe... or it would more likely be 1.2TF... that's still almost 4x more powerful than what the current switch is.
About a 30%-50% difference in graphics horsepower depending on the application.That's a wide range...
Switch 2: 1.3Tflop <---> 1.84Tflops.
1 (Switch 2) TF ≠ 1 (PS4) TF. Teraflops ≠ (whole) Power.That's a wide range...
Switch 2: 1.3Tflop <---> 1.84Tflops.
I'm only talking about the power range/performance range.Is 1 Switch 2 TF=1 PS4 TF besides Teraflops ≠ (whole) Power?