“wash every pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist SOB right into the ocean.”
She is describing several minority groups who tend to sway liberal with these comments. Some of you do realize that right?
Not that it makes it any better either way because it is hate speech of a different horse. These broad assumptions concerning party, wealth, race and so on are no better then the Pat Robertsons of the world that she is actually attacking.
And it is not simply intolerance of intolerance as someone refereed to earlier. It is the assumption that someones political leanings make them believe in every aspect of a platform. And then using such hyperbole to say they should all go drown in the Gulf of Mexico. That every member of the right or left is a mindless drone.
Some people agree with Democrats or Republicans less then half of the time, but they agree with the other party even less. It does not mean that they are anti-gay, or pro-Che or whatever extreme you want to place them in.
She quoted something idiotic, that everyone with a functioning head on their shoulders should condemn. Just as the right have crazy ass religious nuts hoping for the rapture deserve to be ridiculed. You have zero sway if you justify stupidity as a justifiable argument to attacking anothers stupid person.