• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AI generates fake Obama videos

E-Cat

Member
Combine this with the kind of "Photoshop for audio" tech that many companies are working on, and you have your real 'fake news'.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
Interesting commercial application would be for translated video, such as movies or TV shows, in order to have proper lipsynch.

Heck, translation itself will be automated, and the translated voice will be generated based on the original, which will likely be generated and modulated anyway according to a director's desires.
 

ajpw

Member
so it wont be long until we can have video proof of anybody saying anything we like

this will end well
 

Robotguy

Member
The programs that are used in the future to produce these animations will need to have a rock solid system of verification, say, like image processing programs are protected against money falsification, so that these technologies cannot be used to spread misinformation. Either watermarks, or protection against the use of faces of politicians and celebrities, or some kind of encrypted metadata in the files they produce, or simply a telltale sign that the image is artificial.
Even if you legally mandate that the software makes the videos identifiable as fake you're not going to be able to enforce it on a global scale forever. Eventually someone somewhere will develop their own tech outside of the law if they have a big enough incentive to do so.
 

E-Cat

Member
so it wont be long until we can have video proof of anybody saying anything we like

this will end well
Then we'll have to build AI's to expose fake videos.

Actually, something similar is already being done in GAN image generation models, where one agent tries to guess which images are real and which have been generated by another AI agent in a sort of endless tug of war.
 

Carn82

Member
The programs that are used in the future to produce these animations will need to have a rock solid system of verification, say, like image processing programs are protected against money falsification, so that these technologies cannot be used to spread misinformation. Either watermarks, or protection against the use of faces of politicians and celebrities, or some kind of encrypted metadata in the files they produce, or simply a telltale sign that the image is artificial.

Yup.. Although I guess that having multicamera setups for official videos and interviews 'n stuff would be very hard to recreate digitally, especially with 'noise' (crowds, other people, etc) in the background. But we will probably see the age that video will have to proof it's authenticity.
 

mr jones

Ethnicity is not a race!
Yup, that's scary.

That's REALLY hard to tell that it's not real. The only way I could tell is during pauses in his speech - the model has a problem with those micro-movements when not saying anything. Otherwise it's pretty on point. Had I not known about this technology, I'd had thought I was simply watching a video of Obama.
 

Robotguy

Member
Then we'll have to build AI's to expose fake videos.

Actually, something similar is already being done in GAN image generation models, where one agent tries to guess which images are real and which have been generated by another AI agent in a sort of endless tug of war.
People will just claim the verification AI results are fake if they don't want to believe them.
 

Shauni

Member
This technology has truly frightening political implications as it becomes more affordable. Sure Hollywood can sort of do that now, but as it becomes cheaper and easier to do, I really don't like where that could go in the wrong hands. Especially with today's political climate.

It's one of the reasons we need aggressive laws against propaganda and fake news, like some European countries have or are looking into. People are afraid of that, too, of course, in that it will be used against the left when they're drafted. So, it's a lose-lose, except it's not really since law can be drafted in ways to make it less exploitable, but you know, 'mah free speech.'
 

GeoNeo

I disagree.
Great progress should be ready in time for next US election shit show, along with the Adobe Voco shit that has been shown off.

👀💩 shit storm 2 incoming.
 

Future

Member
If you squint you can't tell the difference. But if you actually look at it, the synthetic video looks off.

Still, need this tech in video games NOW
 
In a close up it's pretty obvious that it's fake.

However, treated as security camera footage or degraded in some other ways it would probably be hard to prove one way or another.
 

riotous

Banned
Reminds me of the Tosh.0 intro. They use Obama voice clips to read off their "do not do the stupid stunts in these videos" disclaimer.
 
Russians will use this in the next election to destroy the US's democracy entirely by spreading fake news and these fake videos of the whoever the dem. nominee will be.
 

mr jones

Ethnicity is not a race!
In a close up it's pretty obvious that it's fake.

However, treated as security camera footage or degraded in some other ways it would probably be hard to prove one way or another.

I guess I'm one of those that's easily fooled. Outside of when they were paring the model with the dialog of the Harvey interview, it looks pretty legit.
 
Top Bottom