I've never really associated "desert area" with inaccessible. Maybe only by land vehicle. You'd think that it'd be easy enough to paradrop some French troops to it or land a helicopter on it.Yup (unconfirmed):
I've never really associated "desert area" with inaccessible. Maybe only by land vehicle. You'd think that it'd be easy enough to paradrop some French troops to it or land a helicopter on it.Yup (unconfirmed):
I've never really associated "desert area" with inaccessible. Maybe only by land vehicle. You'd think that it'd be easy enough to paradrop some French troops to it or land a helicopter on it.
At least you have a chance of surviving a car crash. You statistically have zero chance of surviving a plane crash unless it's in a jungle or maybe in the ocean.What the fuck is happening with planes this week (And month, dammit)
While i'm not disputing that indeed, flying is still the safest way, you need to account for the amount of people-miles (Or perhaps people-hours) that every travel way does. While cars are still the most dangerous transport method, the blowout statistics mainly come out of the fact that most travelling is done on cars.
At least you have a chance of surviving a car crash. You statistically have zero chance of surviving a plane crash unless it's in a jungle or maybe in the ocean.
At least you have a chance of surviving a car crash. You statistically have zero chance of surviving a plane crash unless it's in a jungle or maybe in the ocean.
Are you just making shit up, or do you have actual facts to support this claim?
EDIT: Get 'em, Crab!
...it's like you didn't even read the last page.
Pretty much the entire flight is on autopilot except takeoff and landing.Most of the time it's not one person though, it's two. Two and an autopilot that is used extensively.
How people can ride planes without any fear is beyond me
16:29: Pablo Esparza, BBC Mundo
Sources from the National Center for Sexual Education (CENESEX), where Mariela Castro is the director, said to BBC Mundo that she is taking part in an event in Havana.
I only get bothered flying over water, I don't want to get eaten by sharks if we crash ;_;How people can ride planes without any fear is beyond me
Now this is getting ridiculous, if its an airbus A320 the weather can't bring her down. These are built to handle typhoon type of weather.
Its either a mechanical failure or it was shoot down by someone, the latter is very unlikely since no one in the region have the necessary equipment.
How can people drive cars without fear? At least trained professionals fly planes. The only thing between you and death in the car is your own dumb ass and the teeming masses of humanity, a majority of which are dumbasses.
How people can ride planes without any fear is beyond me
It just doesn't make sense. Following the same logic, we could argue that the Apollo missions were safer than driving in a car.
Professionals still make mistakes though
When a plane crash there is some kid of side effect in the pilots so you can expect some planes also crash days after the first crash.
It seems this is happening now.
This would almost indicate a never ending sequenceWhen a plane crash there is some kid of side effect in the pilots so you can expect some planes also crash days after the first crash.
It seems this is happening now.
This would almost indicate a never ending sequence
what is with plane crashes nowadays. two days ago a 17 year old and his father died when their plane crashed into the pacific ocean. they were trying to beat a round the globe world record:
Indiana teen pilot dies on around-world flight
Cuba said Castro was alive.
So there are survivors it seems.
When a plane crash there is some kid of side effect in the pilots so you can expect some planes also crash days after the first crash.
It seems this is happening now.
Mariela Castro was a huge LGBT activist
RIP to her and all the other passengers.
How does using time instead of distance modify that conclusion?
This is just horrible, 2 accident in two days possibly killing 160+ people, 3 over the last week with a possible combined death toll of 360+. This year has not been good for any one at all.
By using time they'd be statistically far more dangerous (which they are, obviously).
Measuring deaths?
Deaths and life-threatening accidents, yes.
But no one was killed going to the moon. How do you define a life threatening accident in either case?
Apollo 1. As for life threatening accidents, I think a severe failure such as the one on the Apollo 13 would qualify. That's the same metric used on those statistics on plane flights, I imagine.
By using time they'd be statistically far more dangerous (which they are, obviously).
Apollo 1 wasn't transporting anyone anywhere. And how do you quantify life threatening accidents in regards to automobiles? By the definition used to include Apollo 13 you would need to track car problems and near misses that don't result in injury or death.
I'm waiting to board my plane right now.
They say the best time to fly is immediately after a crash, but when there is a crash every day...
Oh vey, Apollo 1 (even that test flight) was part of the Apollo missions, which is what I was talking about. Besides, even if you move the goalpoast, if I start my car and the engine explodes, it's still a vehicular accidental death.