If I remember correctly, many people were also skeptical of Alice in Wonderland. They thought it looked weird, they were getting sick of Depp's shit, it didn't look like the Alice in Wonderland they were used to, the 3D was really diorama-like...
fucking killed at the box-office.
If it happens every summer for over 2 decades, it's not a "trend."
I'm not exactly sure how that has anything to do with what I posted.
It's a damn shame because Alice in Wonderland was a terrible movie.
If I remember correctly, many people were also skeptical of Alice in Wonderland. They thought it looked weird, they were getting sick of Depp's shit, it didn't look like the Alice in Wonderland they were used to, the 3D was really diorama-like...
fucking killed at the box-office.
also prequels bother me in general. for one, it always fucks up the continuity. and second, it always looks better than the first one, but its taking place in the past.
There's got to be some exceptions to this rule.
Paranormal Activity 2 would probably be the one that immediately springs to mind. Also, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Godfather Part II. Freddy Vs. Jason. Puss In Boots.
Not to say that OZ won't look completely different from the original Wizard of Oz, obviously.
Well, from the looks of it in this movieI wonder what challenge the wicked witch can be when she can beaten by just pouring water on her.Besides she can't die because this is a prequel, right?
Oddly enough, it kind of is. It's supposed to take place before Raiders of the Lost Ark.That's a prequel?
That's a prequel?
That's a prequel?
Indiana Jones & The Temple of Doom is set in 1935, prior to World War 2 and the rise of the Nazi regime......though there's obviously a meta-reference to a joke in the first film, where Indy is confronted with a sword-wielding henchman and reaches for his gun to shoot him (this time it isn't there - ha, ha). They set it prior to the first film since they supposedly did not want to have Nazi villains again. Which sounds ridiculous, since they could have made a true sequel without Nazis, but whatever.
Wasn't Robert Downey Jr first approached to play Oz ? He would've been a waaayy better choice I think Franco is a great as a supporting actor but i don't think he's charismatic to pull of this type of character. Plus the CGI looks like shit.
Wasn't Robert Downey Jr first approached to play Oz ? He would've been a waaayy better choice I think Franco is a great as a supporting actor but i don't think he's charismatic to pull of this type of character. Plus the CGI looks like shit.
I love Weisz, Kunis and Campbell. If they had gotten RDJ, this would be worth it just for the stars alone. Still wanna see this because 1) I love the original Wizard of Oz and 2) I love Weisz, Kunis and Campbell.Not only was he approached, I'm pretty sure he was signed on for a considerable amount of time before bowing out. I could be wrong, but I thought the story was that he'd agreed, and then had to walk.
Wasn't Robert Downey Jr first approached to play Oz ?
Franco kind of kills it for me. I can't really see him in that roll. Something is very off about him.
Oh my God I would watch the shit out of that.
Clearly Rachel Weisz is going to be the wicked witch, right? I'd think that from the look of the trailers and the fight with the other witch they showed. Besides she's all dressed in green, I don't think Disney is that subtle (not to make someone else the witch at least). Kind of like the power rangers colors. lol
Neither Franco nor Ryan Reynolds are leading men material. I will lay it out here for you right now.
The casting in this film is so bonkers to me.Zach Braff is the deal breaker for me.