One thing to watch next year will be QBs getting lit the f' up on those read gives. Ravens went hard at Kaep all game long and his play showed it.
One thing to watch next year will be QBs getting lit the f' up on those read gives. Ravens went hard at Kaep all game long and his play showed it.
Takes balls to blitz right there, thought it was a good no call.
Edit: I snap the ball to the punter and let him hold it and take a knee for the safety, it's your best bet.
Edit: Brilliant!
In the playoffs, yeah. Refs will be playing it close in the regular season. Noway that hit on Kap goes unpunished in week 10.
One thing to watch next year will be QBs getting lit the f' up on those read gives. Ravens went hard at Kaep all game long and his play showed it.
Did it to RG too, may have factored into some bad decisions (keep/give), but I doubt it, the Ravens gave Skins the dive.
This. In a game where a defensive back is throwing bombs at a dude's junk, right in front of an official, and it's an offsetting penalty, I'm not sure what to take from this game vis a vis stopping the 49ers. The Ravens mauled the WRs all game and committed men to the box. That won't work in the regular season.
Really, that game was soccer bad. Officiating is such a disaster in this sport. I won't bother reading the megathread, but it has to suck for 49ers fans to lose like that
More than that I think it impacts the play calling.
RG got decked in similar fashion during the Ravens/Skins game, didn't call a thing. Shit will change when a QB gets hurt, like always.
I thought it was officiated like an NHL playoff game, everything goes. I've seen others mention that they want this in playoff football, officials swallowing their whistles, but this is the end game. Didn't think that last play was that bad to be honest. Culliver was holding all game too.
I thought it was a shit game to be honest.
I agree with this, you can't have your QB getting blown up.
They'd have to change the rules, as it stands a QB on an option play is a ball carrier and can be presumed to have the ball, which means they get two full steps to hit him.
I was wondering about this as Kaep was at least shoved on every option play even if he wasn't anywhere near the action.
I don't see how you change the rules. If he's going to run from that look, how can you expect defense to not tackle him? I'd equate it to tackling the dive man in the wishbone
I know what you're saying, but I prefer the playoff ruleset. I just wish they'd formalize it and let them play that way all season. Some of the ticky tack stuff they call in the regular season is infuriating, even though it benefits my team (Packers) these days. At least in the playoffs if they call PI, you know it was definitely PI.Yeah it was bad a game. I know we are a touch off track here but I'm not doing the main thread. I really think the Ravens entire defensive strategy was to take advantage of "playoff football". They are so slow. How many times did they just slap a guy in the head as hard as possible at the end of a play? And SF definitely grabbed all game too, just Boldin is too strong. I can't get over how bad that crew was. So many punches thrown and offsetting penalties
I hate the idea that there are two different seasons. People watch hockey for the great athletes and skaters, not for maulers with forearms and stick grabbing.
A foul is a foul. I really hated watching that game. The Ravens remind me of the Knicks from the 90s. Just foul and do whatever it takes and hope it isn't called. Ain't cheating ain't trying I guess.
edit:
And that is why Fangio got fired in HOU. He has no ideas. Just relied on his great athletes and ran simple stuff on D. Once Justin Smith got hurt he was clueless to scheme up pressure
Yeah it was bad a game. I know we are a touch off track here but I'm not doing the main thread. I really think the Ravens entire defensive strategy was to take advantage of "playoff football". They are so slow. How many times did they just slap a guy in the head as hard as possible at the end of a play? And SF definitely grabbed all game too, just Boldin is too strong. I can't get over how bad that crew was. So many punches thrown and offsetting penalties
I hate the idea that there are two different seasons. People watch hockey for the great athletes and skaters, not for maulers with forearms and stick grabbing.
A foul is a foul. I really hated watching that game. The Ravens remind me of the Knicks from the 90s. Just foul and do whatever it takes and hope it isn't called. Ain't cheating ain't trying I guess.
edit:
And that is why Fangio got fired in HOU. He has no ideas. Just relied on his great athletes and ran simple stuff on D. Once Justin Smith got hurt he was clueless to scheme up pressure
Aldon Smith was a miserable player after the Smith injury, how the fuck do you let Brian McKinnie kick the shit out of you?
I'
Aldon Smith was a miserable player after the Smith injury, how the fuck do you let Brian McKinnie kick the shit out of you?
So obvious tonight. He had three huge missed tackles. The just bounced everything outside right at him when opportunities presented themselves and he would always whiff. Guy is a liability against a team that has any desire to ever run.
But SF's goal line play calling was terrible. All rollouts on short yardage should die. Especially with Ngata out. Run right at them
You can't, that's why they are going to keep lighting these guys up. That's going to be the solution. Teams won't have a spy, they'll have a designated hitter.
The heavy option PA wasn't equipped to deal with the edge blitzing tonight. Yeah it allows the QB to see the play develop but it's also a slow "animation" and it puts the ball fakee in a shitty position to get outside and help on pickup. Niners never had tailback hots which I thought was weird, I expected a lot of throws underneath Lewis to the diving back but it never came.
They were pretty conservative for most of the game. I honestly don't recall them running a trap, maybe they did and it didn't work. With that run blitzing it may have been too risky to let someone go unblocked for a bit. Or maybe they did and it wasn't going anywhere.
Strange game, definitely the strangest SB. I ate too much junk and feel like shit.
I assume they just didn't think they could wham Ngata.
I assume they just didn't think they could wham Ngata.
True, he had a pretty good half of football.
btw what is with Moss. How does that guy just loaf through a SB? I'm not talking about his lost speed. He just won't compete for the ball. Why did he come back?
Guy can't move laterally. I don't think it's a lack of effort, he just cannot move side to side or change directions. He's old as fuck, dude!
btw what is with Moss. How does that guy just loaf through a SB? I'm not talking about his lost speed. He just won't compete for the ball. Why did he come back?
Self preservation. He wants to run sideline routes exclusively. On the int he knew the hit was coming, wanted nothing to do with it.
You guys think that Kaep outplayed Flacco tonight?
It may have been too high. Will have to catch it on Rewind. But Suggs, Reed, Lewis and Ngata were willing to inject God knows what to get themselves able to play. Randy will always be the Jeff George of WRs to me. Had a HoF career but left a lot on the table
You guys think that Kaep outplayed Flacco tonight?
You guys think that Kaep outplayed Flacco tonight?
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/42452/59/team-needs--and--roster-rankings?pg=1
Breakdown of team rosters and needs. Anyone disagree with the assessment for their team? Does that belong in this thread? I'm not talking about the ranking of the rosters. Just the roster analysis
I think WR and a fast LB are the Patriots their biggest need. We have been doing what we're doing on O for too long now and it just doesn't work when the playoffs come around. Lloyd is nice, but he's not the answer on the outside. A big/strong guy on the outside would be real nice, hell an Anquain Boldin type guy would be amazing. Brady isn't going to throw it deep, but a WR who can dominate with size/strength could work.
LB is also a big need unless if they force Hightower to drop 30 pounds, this group is just too slow and always a liability in coverage, the endless amounts of drop off passes to RBs out of the backfield and TEs over the middle are always getting 7-15 yards against this team.
CBs will be a question mark until they re-sign Talib and Arrington. Re-sign those guys and with the return of Ras-I Dowling this could be a good mix. Talib and Dennard on the outside with Ras-I as a back-up and Arrington in the slot where he actually plays well.
Need another safety, although I liked the play of Tavon Wilson throughout the year and are curious about how he plays after another year in camp bunched up with McCourty at the back end.
Vollmer was the best RT in the league when healthy, re-siging him will be a priority, focus on some depth on the Oline and they should be good to go with the best Oline coach in the world.
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/42452/59/team-needs--and--roster-rankings?pg=1
Breakdown of team rosters and needs. Anyone disagree with the assessment for their team? Does that belong in this thread? I'm not talking about the ranking of the rosters. Just the roster analysis
I agree. Team specific roster discussions should be in the main offseason thread.Any time someone lists backup QB as a position of need I think they are an asshole, frankly.
Also, I think this belongs in the other thread. Team specific stuff like this should go there.
My mental breakdown is "if it's about players/teams it goes in the main thread, if it's about schemes or specific play breakdowns, it's this thread"
So draft prospect talk would go in the other thread too?
Sure can. I think its inevitable we'll get some "how does this player fit into this scheme" conversation as well and I think that's ok as well as long as there's something more to say than "I like this guy cause he's fast". I mean if you think someone would be a good prospect for the Cowboys and are curious if a certain defensive player fits into a 4-3, then that's a fine question that can be delved into, IMO.So draft prospect talk would go in the other thread too?
http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/42452/59/team-needs--and--roster-rankings?pg=1
Breakdown of team rosters and needs. Anyone disagree with the assessment for their team? Does that belong in this thread? I'm not talking about the ranking of the rosters. Just the roster analysis
I guess we can talk prospects, but not how they would fit on a specific team. You watch a lot of UT. How is Vaccarro? Would you want [your team] to draft him?