He's not getting paid a liveable wage.You're getting paid for the ride, why would you need a tip on top of it?
Yes, it doesn't make a lot of sense to assume that Uber is going to pay owners of self-driving cars at the same rate they pay their drivers. If they did that, there would be no point in switching to driverless cars.
Because most people don't carry cash and want to tip me. So why shouldn't there be a mechanism to do so?You're getting paid for the ride, why would you need a tip on top of it?
It's uber land in chicago.I should also add Lyft is about a thousand times more popular in Los Angeles than Uber
I live in an extremely active social area and Uber drivers are uncommon compared to Lyft
I'll see a few local drivers on Uber app yet my Lyft app shows them everywhere
I doubt it. I bet alot of this is because of the 'free rides' Uber gives out everytime they launch in a new city. And they launched in alot of cities in 2015.Ever thought Uber's prices were too good to be true? Well they were.
Wait, why would driverless cars make more money for Uber? How does the math work?
Uber is trying to hold it's place until it can actually cut the costs with automated cars. It's a risky strategy but if they pull it off
What if instead of lending their time to Uber, people who own a self-driving car lease their car to Uber for a cut of the profit.
Fuck did I just make someone else billions of dollars.
That's actually really fucking smart. "While I'm at work, I'm going to make some extra cash using my car as an automated taxi"
don't forget the government surveillanceSelf-driven cars will be drones, all collecting video data neerly 24/7 everywhere they go. That data will be sold to third parties to be analyzed by neural networks for various purposes.
There's huge amounts of money to make, they just need time.
No worries, just send your car to a Polish car wash and call yourself an uber free of charge! The perpetrator will be billed for your expenses.Sounds Great!
Now I can go home from work....
Nice, Someone shit on the seats again. Sweet.
Because most people don't carry cash and want to tip me. So why shouldn't there be a mechanism to do so?
Also .75 a mile is hardly being paid tbh.
Amazing that a company with virtually zero overhead for 99% of its employees can't break even.
Is the cost per ride simply from running the matchmaking servers and gps?
Amazing that a company with virtually zero overhead for 99% of its employees can't break even.
Is the cost per ride simply from running the matchmaking servers and gps?
The article misses ubers entire long term strategy. They want to be robot taxis in five years with zero driver overhead. They establish the brand with humans until automated cars are ready to take over and bring in the profits.
Well whats more expensive, upkeep and fuel for a car or a livable human salary. I would think that since people use part of their salary for general upkeep of a car a human salary is more. I would think you would still save money if you hire a few people to handle a lot of cars. This savings increases with self driving eletric vehiclesIf its untenable now I wonder how they are going to manage when they have to purchase and upkeep millions of automated vehicles?
I have a feeling the guy who buys a $50,000 car is going to be more upset when he/she puts in a call for it, waits 30 minutes for it to show up only to have it show up filled with vomit, booze, and used condoms (if it shows up at all). Even if, best case scenario, the perps caught, that's still a pretty shitty day.I just don't think the kind of person that buys a $30,000-$50,000 car is really going to like the idea that more than half the miles put on it are going to be put on it by someone else. Why spend that kind of money if you aren't even going to enjoy it half the time?
Nevermind that at the end of a hard day you're potentially going to be cleaning food/soda/vomit off the upholstery or dealing with stains and scents that may or may not ever come out.
Well whats more expensive, upkeep and fuel for a car or a livable human salary. I would think that since people use part of their salary for general upkeep of a car a human salary is more. I would think you would still save money if you hire a few people to handle a lot of cars. This savings increases with self driving eletric vehicles
There really needs to be. When I found out how little Uber drivers got paid I started keeping some small bills in my pocket for tipping...which is dumb. And obnoxious, as I rarely use cash for anything. It goes against the whole concept of ease of use. There needs to be a tipping option. Doesn't have to be in your face but the option should be there.
Seriously. The price on the meter is the price I pay. Fuck tipping in all service industries. Fuck tipping out of existence.Fuck that. I hate Uber the company, but one of the good things they're doing is getting rid of the idea that you need to tip a driver.
Now of course, they should be paying drivers a livable wage, but that should be part of the price, not a tip.
Tipping is not meant to be a salary replacement FFS.
Uber is trying to hold it's place until it can actually cut the costs with automated cars. It's a risky strategy but if they pull it off
People care about the brands of their taxis?
I think people just take the cheapest available.
Well the IRS lets you deduct 57 cents per mile for business expenses. So as a rough estimate, that's what it costs to upkeep a car. Currently they pay drivers about 75 cents per mile. It's a savings but not a huge one.
There really needs to be. When I found out how little Uber drivers got paid I started keeping some small bills in my pocket for tipping...which is dumb. And obnoxious, as I rarely use cash for anything. It goes against the whole concept of ease of use. There needs to be a tipping option. Doesn't have to be in your face but the option should be there.
Me too lol.I'm in an Uber right now :/
Me too lol.
I wonder how their foreign investments are going. Basically in the Nordic market they did 0 research about the legality before starting massive campaign and launching their operation here.
The consequence of which was UberPOP shutting down almost instantaneously because it was obvious from the start that what they did was against Swedish law. They had to pay all legal fees for the poor immigrant drivers who were tricked into driving from them.
Essentially the exact same process is happening in Denmark now since UberPOP is a clear violation of Danish law as well. Costly legal procedures are on their way in Finland and Norway as well.
From what I gather costly legal procedures are everywhere in continental Europe as well (Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium etc. etc).
Must be tons of costs associated with basically failing in all these markets, which could in most cases be prevented by standard research before entering said market.
Yeah, they are losing billions a year just maintaining an app, I don't see how maintaining massive fleets of automated cars helps them become profitable.While I do think Uber is trying to go for a fully automated taxi fleet. That must means they have to own those cars. That seems rather counter to their core philosophy of being a platform of ride sharing, therefore avoiding a plethora of additional costs and responsibilities of ownership. It means they will need an entire supply chain of automated car manufacturing to car maintenance. I wonder if ultimately it might just be cheaper for them to operate with real drivers?
With enough cars on the road doesn't it become a decent savings? And that would be just with a 1:1 switch, I think bigger incentives to switch to autonomous is that you arent limited by people who have a car AND want to use uber. I am sure in many cities you can have more cars than what was available during the willing human participant days
This should be a big red flag to all of the Web 3.0 (or whatever the fuck you want to call it) companies and investors.
If Uber is this overvalued... what about Snapchat, or any other web company with tons of users and no real profit? We are seeing the warning signs of a huge bubble.