Do you not mind that it's going to be pentile?I'm okay with the S4 being LCD, because I'm waiting for the Note III anyways. That phone better have the 1080p Super AMOLED RGB goodness.
Do you not mind that it's going to be pentile?I'm okay with the S4 being LCD, because I'm waiting for the Note III anyways. That phone better have the 1080p Super AMOLED RGB goodness.
Do you not mind that it's going to be pentile?
I'm rocking Naked Browser, not exactly the most beautiful thing ever but functional and most importantly blazing fast.What's the go to browser of choice here? I'm currently using the new Opera beta and it's fairly impressive.
What's the go to browser of choice here? I'm currently using the new Opera beta and it's fairly impressive.
What's the go to browser of choice here? I'm currently using the new Opera beta and it's fairly impressive.
That should be Dolphin. I really like the interface. Just one swipe and you can access your bookmarks.What's the go to browser of choice here? I'm currently using the new Opera beta and it's fairly impressive.
The note 2 wasn't pentile. Its likely that the Note 3 at 1080p on a 5.8" screen (rumored) won't be pentile either.
Damn, who was it here that first said they had heard Googlerola was planning on debuting a phone with some form of touch input on the backside of the phone?
Patent. Brings a little clarity to all the "Your device shouldn't just break when you drop it" stuff that they were saying a short time back. If there's going to be back of the phone controls, that means less or no cases, but instead: Bumpers.
I know that patents don't ever really give a clear idea of how the final implementation turns out to work, but man, I'm really curious about when we will see this and how it will work and what it will do. Assuming it ever makes it into a device.
Touch and NFC are part of the X phone like no other.
I'll give Dolphin a go, AOSP browser is cool but it's being left behind now.
Are you saying that the Motorola phone is going to have a touchscreen? Sounds revolutionary.
so it's going to be like the vita but more annoying because you'll constantly be using the back touch panel by accidentYou would be surprised by what I mean by what I said.
You would be surprised by what I mean by what I said.
awwwsnap. But yeah it's true.Motorola doesn't make interesting or good enough products for me, or anyone else for that matter, to really care. They're a bit like LG, but without the recent success.
Motorola doesn't make interesting or good enough products for me, or anyone else for that matter, to really care. They're a bit like LG, but without the recent success.
Yup. Moto = shit. Google should just shut it down, or sell it off with an unlimited licence to the patents.
Motorola doesn't make interesting or good enough products for me, or anyone else for that matter, to really care. They're a bit like LG, but without the recent success.
To be fair, I expect you to say that about every company that isn't Sony.
motorola is also the main reason why android exists.
yeah the battery is pretty much the only positive they have going imo. Maxx is some thick shit though, not REALLY thick but the thing is THICK. But even the Razr HD has great battery life at 2500mah way before everyone else did, and other manufacturers still aren't on that.One thing I'll say about Moto is they have the best stock phone for battery life in the Maxx line. Obviously you can try and buy a 3rd party battery for other phones, but the Maxx line definitely wins in terms of battery life with the stock battery.
for the battery size it's definitely impressive but the shit is still thick. But like I said not very thick or anything but it's noticeably bulky. Not that it matters, I'd happily take thicker if it meant better battery life on other phones.Maxx is thick? wtf that shit is crazy slim for it's battery size.
for the battery size it's definitely impressive but the shit is still thick. But like I said not very thick or anything but it's noticeably bulky. Not that it matters, I'd happily take thicker if it meant better battery life on other phones.
IDK who it's being left behind by considering it's still the fastest browser out there. It's still easily the fastest browser when running CM 10.1 on my phone.
have you held it? It's the shape of it. Similar to the lumia 920 (though it is factually thicker), but the shape makes it seem worse. It feels pretty bulky.The Maxx is 9mm at its thickest point. The S3 is 8.6mm and the NoteII is 9.4mm thick. What exactly are you complaining about now?
...the RAZR HD is a big device that really pushes the limits of what we consider a "phone." While other large phones, like HTC’s One X or Samsung’s Galaxy S III, employ rounded corners and minimal borders around their displays to mask their large size, the RAZR HD’s squarish design and large bezel makes it feel bigger than the competition.
you mean Verison. any OEM with their ad backing would have done the same. could have been HTC or LG in their spot with the same result.
I'm not sure if you can assume that the Chrome dev team obviously know what they are doing, the Android devs have been working with their mobile browser longer after all. The Nexus 10 shipped with a crippling Chrome bug that caused crashes every 15 mins (or it seemed). And I don't mean it just crashed the browser -- it crashed the whole OS and forced a reboot.He means by Google. They stopped developing the AOSP browser because they are replacing it with Chrome in the future. I think it's probably a good thing too, because it's only a matter of time before they make Chrome just as good. I mean why would they not be able to do it? AND now you've actually got the Chrome dev team working on the browser instead of just Android devs so they obviously know what they're doing.
From the gsmarena review, and this the razr maxx... you know what we're all taking about before you tried to move the goalposts:have you held it? It's the shape of it. Similar to the lumia 920 (though it is factually thicker), but the shape makes it seem worse. It feels pretty bulky.
And I'm not complaining at all. You guys are defensive lol.
I'm not alone. From the verge review, and this is the razr HD...not even the maxx:
Motorola achieved the unthinkable with the RAZR MAXX. A 9mm body, which is slim even by today's [August 24, 2012] modern standards, fits a battery that dwarfs all others.
The AOSP Browser uses a regular WebView to display pages, which has and will continue to receive updates.He means by Google. They stopped developing the AOSP browser because they are replacing it with Chrome in the future. I think it's probably a good thing too, because it's only a matter of time before they make Chrome just as good. I mean why would they not be able to do it? AND now you've actually got the Chrome dev team working on the browser instead of just Android devs so they obviously know what they're doing.
probably not though, samsung would rather a giant phone than a thick one.That concept is some thick shit though, not REALLY thick but the thing is THICK.
I think its more how it feels in hand. The s3 hides its size very well with the rounded corners and sloped sides. The razr feels larger due to its square corners and sides. Thats my experience anyway. I found the razr uncomfortable to hold and use to be honest. Great build quality though.The Maxx is 9mm at its thickest point. The S3 is 8.6mm and the NoteII is 9.4mm thick. What exactly are you complaining about now?
I'm not sure if you can assume that the Chrome dev team obviously know what they are doing, the Android devs have been working with their mobile browser longer after all. The Nexus 10 shipped with a crippling Chrome bug that caused crashes every 15 mins (or it seemed). And I don't mean it just crashed the browser -- it crashed the whole OS and forced a reboot.
The AOSP browser also had active third party development. Not just from Samsung, Sony etc who skinned it for their phones but from developers in the Play store like the icS Browser + which I linked to earlier. Is Chromium for Android similarly accessible? I haven't seen anything like that yet...
that said, if Google added quick controls to the Chrome browser tomorrow I would switch to it immediately.