-Pyromaniac-
Member
in the world of android those dimensions are pretty small though, at least if you want a good phone.+1
Although it's not small by any means.
But yeah he should just get it and live with it
in the world of android those dimensions are pretty small though, at least if you want a good phone.+1
Although it's not small by any means.
I'm starting to lose faith on this front. I thought they were saving the big version update for the big upgrade that would finally fix all its issues but then they brought up to version parity (I think?) and it's still pretty similar...........still hoping they release an update with KLP.Playing around with the Google plus app reminds me of what an optimized app feels like. They really need to optimize Chrome. It's embarrassing.
Speaking of Chrome. Is there anyway for it to remember your most visited websites? Instead of typing m.neogaf.com in the address bar can't I just type "n" and it'll automatically recognize what I mean and suggest m.neogaf.com?
Even though I have mobile Gaf as one of my bookmarks I have to type most of the address for it to show up as a suggestion.
I miss that on my old Optimus One running Gingerbread.
So, was the “ultra pixel” camera really to blame? No. Not the hardware anyway. The cause for the soft images was, and always has been nothing more than a software issue, something HTC could easily fix in a software update. The good news? They have. While testing out the HTC One’s camera prowess, HardwareZone.com.sg has gotten hold of an official update for the HTC One that finally addresses Sense’s camera quality (all their devices have suffered from this same issue, mind you). The update gets rid of the excessive noise filtering bringing about images that are much more sharp and crisp. Taking a look at the before and after pics are like night and day. I almost can’t believe it’s the same phone! What a difference an update makes.
I usually just go to the bookmarks page and the click the left tab on the bottom left of the screen. It shows your most visited pages. The mobile Neogaf website is always on there for me so it's easy that way, lol.
I'm starting to lose faith on this front. I thought they were saving the big version update for the big upgrade that would finally fix all its issues but then they brought up to version parity (I think?) and it's still pretty similar...........still hoping they release an update with KLP.
SecondedOnly thing I'd wish they'd bring back from the stock browser is the quick nav. So good.
Nobody needs to speculate about the development of Chrome for Android. Just Google "Chrome Issues". As it's open source you can see exactly what they are working on. From reading it, the team know that it's not yet buttery smooth and that a lot more work is required. And they are currently putting together benchmarks to enable them to understand performance better and get to the root of what is causing the frame rate drops. Unfortunately it's not going to happen overnight.
Maybe they could just chat with the developers at Samsung, LG, Motorola, and HTC who all customize the stock browser to make it perform better on their respective hardware. I mean, this isn't exactly rocket science here, optimizing a web browser.
Opera uses the same base now for their beta. Twas night and day compared to Chrome when it hit. I also don't think it was a high priority for Google for a long time so they are trying to play catch up on work that should have been done all along.
Also it isn't as if the other browsers aren't HTML 5 compliant. Plus other browsers allow extensions.
Face it. Google has just botched this one up to this point. Hey it happens to the best of them.
Yes of course. They should have realised that they just need some more optimization.
They are building from a base that was not designed with Android in mind. This isn't building from scratch and that brings with it legacy code never designed to run in the Android environment. In the long term we'll see the benefits of Chrome on Android. They can do a lot better, no doubt. No one's arguing they can't. But optimizing a code base designed to run on a desktop environment clearly is difficult, unless you are suggesting it's easy and either the Chrome team are idiots or that they can't be bothered to make a good web browser for Android. I don't think either of these things are the case. Chrome on iOS isn't even Chrome. It's just a re-skinned Safari, in case that comes up as a comparison.
Part of the problem is that Chrome is only just starting to make use of hardware acceleration in all environments.
In the long term we'll have the benefit of improvements to the engine that runs Chrome and have desktop class speeds. And a framework that could potentially support extensions and all the latest HTML 5 standards. Yes, it's frustrating that Chrome isnt a consistent 60fps, but it's too simplistic an argument to say "it's not rocket science" when neither of us are familiar with some of the coding challenges involved.
Opera uses the same base now for their beta. Twas night and day compared to Chrome when it hit. I also don't think it was a high priority for Google for a long time so they are trying to play catch up on work that should have been done all along.
Also it isn't as if the other browsers aren't HTML 5 compliant. Plus other browsers allow extensions.
Face it. Google has just botched this one up to this point. Hey it happens to the best of them.
I would never use one of those pie/wheel things.
Why not?
I wouldn't use it because you miss out on the alerts in the status bar. I don't want to bring up the pie every time I get a notification just to see what it is.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/03/26/galaxy-s-4-will-launch-on-t-mobile-on-may-1st-with-lte/Galaxy S 4 Will Launch On T-Mobile On May 1st With LTE
T-Mobile is not playing around today at its "UNcarrier" event. In addition to formally announcing the new, simplified prices with optional equipment repayment plans, and a shiny new LTE network, the company also says that the Galaxy S 4 will be arriving on its airwaves on May 1st, packing the ability to hook into that lovely 4G.
The carrier did not, however, elect to mention the pricing of the device. It has said that the iPhone, HTC One, and Blackberry Z10 will all have a $99 up front price and a $20/month payment plan. Over the course of 24 months, this makes the final price about $580 for those devices. And, as we learned before, base price + monthly hardware cost * 24 months = total price of handset unlocked. If it follows the same pattern, you can (probably!) get the T-Mobile version of the GS4 for $580 sans contract. Not a bad deal. Of course, that's speculation at this point, and once we have confirmation from T-Mo, you'll know.
The Archos tablets are slowly becoming available in North America. I made a thread. Has anyone bought one yet? Are they the usual Archos garbage or have they finally delivered some decent tablets?
by 'the same base' do you mean Webkit?
not Go Launcher lol. Aka just Apex or Nova. I say apex but yeah just try em out.what do you guys reckon is the best launcher?
what do you guys reckon is the best launcher?
also web browser? I'm assuming its not chrome lol.
also web browser? I'm assuming its not chrome lol.
This is the image CyanogenMod posted on their G+:Because the Menu button is fucked. It's like having a hardware Menu button all over again. You never know which apps use it, when it's used, whether it leads to a new menu on another part of the app. Absolutely obnoxious.
what do you guys reckon is the best launcher?
Is the Xperia P an okay phone? I found it at a reasonable price.
Man, I'm going to miss my blue Lumia. How come 99.9% of all Android phones are either black or white? :/
AOSP Browser aka stock browser for speed.
Some still use Chrome because they like the syncing with the desktop feature.
Other alternatives to look at would be Dolphin + Jetpack and the new Opera Beta browser.
I wonder if they have the Menu button disabled. Or as a pop up for when it's used.This is the image CyanogenMod posted on their G+:
[IM]https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-rBByoFV5o58/UVElleUNBeI/AAAAAAAAD2Y/lth5MS0EnLs/s662/Pie.png[/IMG]
Yeah, silver is what I wanted. And as old as it is it seems like it's quite a step above my Lumia 800, lol. I'll miss the AMOLED screen, though (for like 5 minutes).It's quite old, but one of the best phones in that price-class (don't know how well it holds up though).
That aluminium unibody looks classy as fuck in silver, absolutely get that colour.
I have no idea if this site is reputable or what these numbers really mean, but other people in here may be able to shed some light on this.
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S4-vs-HTC-One_id3282/page/2
Halfway down this page they did a speed test between the S4 and the One and it was split 50/50. Not the 8 core processor in the S4 of course but I'm shocked the S4 didn't wipe the floor with the One. I was expecting it to.
Have you guys tried Lightning Launcher? It seems pretty cool and super customizable.
Chrome is now faster than stock. It's just the frame rate performance that's worse.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/03/is-new-chrome-for-android-as-fast-as-google-promises/
New Chrome still runs like balls for me. I think it's a combination of my hardware and my rom as others have stated the same thing in the ROM thread on XDA.
The company has confirmed that pre-orders in the States have reached “several hundred thousand” as we near the HTC One’s late April release for AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile.