CurlySaysX
Banned
Any word when the Xperia S will get Jellybean?
Someone in this thread said before November. Sony were apparently wanting to release ICS to all it's devices before they started to roll out Jelly Babies.
Any word when the Xperia S will get Jellybean?
what is "shocking" about that LG rumor? 16 GB max is a little "disappionting" and everything else sounds pretty standard for a top of the line phone.
I currently have 24GB free on my 32GB GNex. I'm pretty much all in the cloud. Storage is my last worry.
Its nice to want things. But it has already been explained more than once. Google is not Apple. They do not have a god phone they launch every year. The Nexus will never be a "This versus the newest latest iPhone" sort of device. Its never been that way, and it never will because Android is not run like iOS is. Android flagships are launched by OHA members running their software skins, period. End of story.
Google is not going to turn into Apple and start chucking out phones through Motorola either. Thats not what this platform is. Nexus devices will have moderate hardware, nothing groundbreaking at all, they will be modest in price and run Vanilla Android. That's the draw, it'll never be a massive draw, and it'll never be the top selling Android handset, ever.
I feel like Debbie Downer holding a broken record, but still, its true. I dont see this approach changing as its done nothing but good for Google and the Android platform to date. I know people would love to have this 'Jesus' Phone from Google and Apple both to sit beside one another, but that just does not fit, the approaches to things are far to different with Apple and Google to do that.
The device is based on the Optimus G but doesn't look the same
Updated Android release (currently 4.2)
Quad Core Snapdragon S4 processor
2GB RAM
1280x768 True-HD IPS screen
On screen soft keys (of course)
8 Megapixel Camera
No microSD slot
8GB and 16GB versions only (at least initially)
Non-removable battery
Wireless charging built in
The retail name of the device is yet to be decided.
Things change.
Things change.
I don't see google picking Qualcomm soc for its the Nexus platform.
Nexus sell better oversea and oversea doesn't need Qualcomm's LTE radio.
Google can use nV's Tegra3+ for now and move to the next Tegra with intergrated LTE radio next year.
LTE doesn't just exist in America. Us UK'ers are getting it in time for Xmas!
I am pretty sure UK's LTE phones don't use Qualcomm's soc. Neither the S3 LTE, One XL nor Huawei P1 use S4, only the Nokia phones use Qualcomm S4.
The whole 'moderate' hardware thing is a misnomer. The Nexus brand was always supposed to show other OEM's how they could push Android further in hardware and software, and some aspects of the hardware have definitely been cutting edge in a consumer mass market product.
The Nexus One was not moderate when launched. It was either the first, or amongst the first to launch with a 1ghz processor. It was a higher resolution than just about every other phone at the time, except the original Droid. It had one of the first Amoled screens ever used on a phone, up until then it was pretty much all LCD. The hardware design was lovely. The RGB notification too.
The Nexus S was a bit disappointing, I'll grant you but it did include NFC in advance of ICS and now all Android flagship phones have NFC built in.
The Galaxy Nexus had a 720p screen! I can't remember if it was first or the Note was first with this, but that set a trend. Now all flagship phones have at least a 720p screen. No physical buttons either. Now yes, the processor wasn't amazing next to Exynos, but in all honesty up until this year when Snapdragon and Exynos are much closer, what was? The only place the ball was dropped was the camera, but again the Nexus set a trend of having cameras with ludicrously fast shutter times. Lets not forget that the GNexus is very very slim too.
If this next phone includes wireless charging and a 720p screen and a quad core S4 pro, I see no reason why we'd label the hardware 'moderate'. That's the stats of a flagship phone. I'll be interested to see what the battery size is and how slim it is. I fully expect that it'll set a new trend for wireless charging in Android flagship phones going forward.
The LG Optimus G was announced in August, Nexus branded version will be announced in November, hell an updated - slightly higher performance - Qualcomm S4 chipset will be landing in Q1. 4 - 5 months later to market with high end specs, things dont seem to have changed that much.
None of that means that Qualcomms chips are incompatible with UK LTE and unless you can point to evidence that says this, I see no reason why Google wouldn't use them.
I've owned all 3 Nexus smartphones...
N1 = No built-in storage, constantly running out of app space. Thank the gods for Apps2SD. This also led to it getting left behind with the launch of ICS.
Nexus S = Galaxy S, which was probably the best all round nexus device at the time. The only thing is it launched and the end on the single core SoC era.
Galaxy Nexus = Shitty Camera, Weak SoC, Garbage GPU when compared to the iPhone 4S. The Exynos 4410/Mali-400 combo in the S2 that predated it by 7 months ran circles around it.
If the LG Nexus rumors are true, then it's the first well rounded Nexus launch. The only downsides being the storage and non-removable battery, but those are subjective and yet to be set in stone. It's also the first Android device that can actually match the iPhone in GPU.
You missed my point. My point was 1) Qualcomm's soc hardware only shows its advantage in US phones. 2) Google doesn't need to pay extra for that kind of Qualcomm hardware advantage. The advantage the S4 soc offer is not important to the Nexus phones.
Also, Qualcomm has production porblem.
Cnet said:"We challenge all our partners that want to work with us on a Nexus product to push the envelope," Patrick Brady, director of Android Partner Engineering for Google, said in a Q&A with CNET
How quickly we forget the Nexus One touch issues.
Nexus phones should try to set the standard for battery life then too. The Razr's are mopping the floor with that shit
Nexus phones should try to set the standard for battery life then too. The Razr's are mopping the floor with that shit
I don't think anyone is forgetting that, nor the radio problems either. Cutting edge specs don't necessarily make for problem free phones. See the iPhone 4.
The Optimus G has a 2100 maH battery I believe, significantly better than the 1750 on the G Nexus. Rumour has it that 4.2 has better power management too. Guess we'll know soon enough.
Google had planned early to go with TI and that backfired when it turned out that the Exynos in that generation was a monster.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't the decision to go with TI because of the open sourceness (for lack of a better word) of it's SoC/GPU?
I'm pretty sure that's what Google bases a lot of it's hardware decisions on is that all the binaries have to be folded into AOSP, right?
(really not a terribly technical guy, so if i've messed up and rearranged some terms, let me know)
But did you use larger? Like I said, I thought similar to you. Check my post history about the Galaxy Nexus size before it was released. But then I got the Note and after a week, well, I'm pretty content.
I'm not saying a large phone is for everyone. What I am saying, though, is that you may not be as against the idea, in practice, as you think. But that's totally up to you. It's not like you get a $800 just to try out for a week and then return. It's way more of a hassle so I completely understand.
hah! I love how the preface the article with "If you do not want to know about Android 4.2 then do not read this story." WTF! Who would be reading an Android rumor site and be worried about 4.2 "spoilers"??
I hope Roadrunner is true. It's really only thing I'm slightly disappointed in with my GNex.
hah! I love how the preface the article with "If you do not want to know about Android 4.2 then do not read this story." WTF! Who would be reading an Android rumor site and be worried about 4.2 "spoilers"??
I hope Roadrunner is true. It's really only thing I'm slightly disappointed in with my GNex.
You missed my point. My point was 1) Qualcomm's soc hardware only shows its advantage in US phones. 2) Google doesn't need to pay extra for that kind of Qualcomm hardware advantage. The advantage the S4 soc offer is not important to the Nexus phones.
Also, Qualcomm has production porblem.
Customization Center will be the greatest thing for Android ever.
Android and Me said:The whole concept of a Nexus certification program sounds like Google is putting their foot down and taking more control of the Android experience. Even though the program might optional, hopefully the consumers will realize the benefits of a “Nexus ready” device versus something that is just Android-based.
Android & Me said:For the past month we have been reporting that LG was making the next Nexus, and today Roger Cheng of CNET has confirmed our story. According to a “person briefed on the matter”, the LG Nexus phone will be announced at the end of the month.
We previously reported that the LG device might be unveiled in October or November, and we are pretty certain that Google’s Andy Rubin will have something to show when he takes the stage at AllThingsD: Dive Into Mobile at the end of this month.
CNET says the LG Nexus will be announced by the end of October. Still no one denies the multiple nexus rumour though.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-575...-of-the-month/
Android Police has found evidence of a possible Motorola Nexus:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/10...both-motorola/
Android Police has found evidence of a possible Motorola Nexus:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/1...w-phone-and-a-new-nexus-tablet-both-motorola/