I have to compete with the 996 mentality from China.
lol I work 9-10 hour days anyway. companies will lose out on a full day of work.
maybe things are different in other places but in software engineering firms no one really does 9-5 days.
I also wonder if people would be happier if there was more flexibility outside of the normal 8-5 and staggered start/leave times?
mmm, i think youre being a bit naive here
any boss that sees their employees getting there work done in a short amount of time is just going to keep piling on more work until they have them right back to 40 hours a week. and hell why stop there? might as well give them 60 hours worth, why not 80?
i think we need set time limits to get things done. it motivates people to work harder and more efficiently, and also promotes a routine schedule. and of course, stops youre boss from having the power to just keep piling more work on you simply because you are a more productive employee than youre fellow associates.
Pretty much, we spend most of our lives giving our life to unscrupulous companies only to wake up one day at 60+, your bodies knackered, you cant do most things anymore, more than likely you'll be broke with money tied up in other ventures, then your dead..2 free days in a week is definitely not enough, given most people already stress about work on sunday. It kinda leaves just 1 truly free day.
I think it’s great if you don’t like your work and don’t have any ambition.
Most working peoples 'ambition' is outside of 'work'. They're only working to fulfil those ambitions..I think it’s great if you don’t like your work and don’t have any ambition.
Most working peoples 'ambition' is outside of 'work'. They're only working to fulfil those ambitions..
Unless your true ambition is just to work :/
lol, if your ambitions are strictly tied to work your life probably sucks.I think it’s great if you don’t like your work and don’t have any ambition.
Eh, not really sure on that use case. It's not my responsibility to deal with my companies staffing issues. If someone quits suddenly, that's not my problem. They should have better retention/transition strategies. You should never be doing a "favour" for your company, which is what I'd view that as.Should be the norm, yes. 5 day weeks should be used for major deadlines & emergencies (when someone quits suddenly for example).
Yeah. The only people at my work who actually put in 40 hours a week suck at their jobs. Or people who spend their days walking around socializing and considering that working.I can only speak for the engineering sector and the 40 hour work week is a joke. No one actually works 40 hours. It is just a game we have to play because the companies we work for are being run by old guys who think hours = productivity. The age of the internet has changed EVERYTHING. My co-workers and I can easily manage our projects within 30 hours, no problem. Work at home or office does not matter to us. But management still wants 40 hours IN OFFICE, so we just jerk off at our desks for hours and hours. Wasted time for everyone involved. When the internet generation starts to take control of upper management decisions like work weeks, I can easily see most engineering firms downsize to purely deadline-based work schedules. Screw the hours.
Covid showed a lot of companies that hours don't mean anything. Just meeting deadlines.
Why would you have a 25% cut when only working 20% less?Last summer all the salary employees were working 4 days as we had a 25% pay cut due to covid. It was nice having that extra day, but the 25% pay cut sucked! I'm salary and work 5x9 as my standard work week, if we went to 4x10 with the same pay I'd love it.
Why would you have a 25% cut when only working 20% less?
Aesius said:3 day weekends are massive, massive upgrades over 2 day weekends. They actually feel relaxing, whereas 2 day weekends are just long enough to catch your breath and prepare yourself for another 5 day grind while never really being able to put your feet up. Because, as others have said, Sundays are essentially half-days anyway, as the impending doom of the workweek starts to set in around 3 p.m.
It's sad that we live like this. Ultimately the 5 day workweek is more like a 5.5 day workweek because Sunday evening is consumed with thoughts of or preparation for work.Yeah, I never like to go far on a Sunday due to having to be at work the next day. If I'm doing anything it needs to be done on Saturday.
Absolutely. Anyone clamoring to return to the office is crazy. The time and money saved by not having to travel to work every day is significant. Never mind the fact that you don’t have to be professionally presentable 100% of the time. And even if you’re a workaholic, if there’s downtime on workdays you can always transfer that to household chores or other errands. WFH is a super win and people better be careful what they wish for when it comes to restoring pre-pandemic work culture.It's sad that we live like this. Ultimately the 5 day workweek is more like a 5.5 day workweek because Sunday evening is consumed with thoughts of or preparation for work.
And the 8 hour workday is more like a 10-11 hour workday because of commuting and just getting ready in the morning. And then decompressing in the evening. I think that's why WFH is so much nicer for many people. It can give you back 2-3 hours of your day by cutting out commuting. And it even gives you back time on your weekends and evenings because you can get chores done throughout the day as time permits.
Eh, not really sure on that use case. It's not my responsibility to deal with my companies staffing issues. If someone quits suddenly, that's not my problem. They should have better retention/transition strategies. You should never be doing a "favour" for your company, which is what I'd view that as.
Tg89 said:Eh, not really sure on that use case. It's not my responsibility to deal with my companies staffing issues. If someone quits suddenly, that's not my problem. They should have better retention/transition strategies. You should never be doing a "favour" for your company, which is what I'd view that as.
Not all companies are the same of course. In that example I'm envisioning a small local office business, where someone suddenly quitting without warning would be a rare sight, maybe once every 5 years. A lost worker overnight could cause massive disruptions to workflow. If its a bigger corp or a high turnover workplace (restaurant/retail) then of course you as a worker shouldn't be automatically expected to pick up the slack, especially not without extra compensation.
You are the succession plan.It's funny because I have been doing this almost exclusively, filling in for others roles, since I started this job 2 years ago. The job I was hired for I do, but there are so many other things that I do because they don't have anyone else that can do it. Just recently they fired a longtime employee that was the only one that knew how to do their job at the facility they were at, they are in Michigan and I'm in Illinois. I ended up having to do their job for about a month and have been checking the work of the person they put in his place daily because they aren't confident they did it correctly. I don't really mind, but it's a bit ridiculous that a company the size I work for wouldn't have been sure to get someone trained before they fired someone they don't have a succession plan for.
You are the succession plan.
4 day week is not a universal solution for every business. But should be a benefit and motivation to work up to from a business that needs 40 hours like the service industry.Did you read your article from the website HuffingtonPost.com, OP?
"There are no solutions, only trade offs. - Thomas Sowell" - Men_in_Boxes
A shorter work week will certainly have some benefits, but it doesn't sound like the article explored what the drawbacks might be. Plus, I'm semi skeptical of the benefits that were listed.