That's fine, but it isn't "proof". It is simply your own perception of other people's opinions. No one here is going to accept that as proof of anything and they shouldn't, because it just isn't.
It’s easy to say it isn’t “proof” because in order to “prove” my claim of review scores being inflated is technically an impossible feat. How could you scientifically “prove” something like that? We both know you can’t.
It’s not like a murder where I can find fingerprints on a weapon or DNA at the scene to “prove” someone did it.
I used the word “proof” because my evidence comes as close to “proof” as I can possibly get. My claim is obviously a
theory, but it’s a theory based a large collective of opinions for these games when compared to their last-gen predecessors.
You may think that those sequels are all better or equal than the ones released last generation, but please be aware,
you are in the minority on that.
Feel free to conduct a poll on this website for “which game was better” for each of those franchises (except for AstroBot obviously) and get back to me with the results.
Gotta
pretty strong feeling my
theory will materialize in the poll results. Overwhelmingly so, actually.