Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
Eh, Odyssey was also 7 years ago now. Both things can be valid.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
And that's why it will sell well and the completion rates will be highIt’s a ten hour game
For one, Mario Galaxy 2 is a better platformer than Odyssey (and honestly most people agree with that statement), and considering the former came out 7 years before the latter, Mario Odyssey having the same overall score as Mario Galaxy 2 in itself doesn't make much sense.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
For one, Mario Galaxy 2 is a better platformer than Odyssey (and honestly most people agree with that statement), and considering the former came out 7 years before the latter, Mario Odyssey having the same overall score as Mario Galaxy 2 in itself doesn't make much sense.
I'm hoping it sells as well as it has reviewed. It's not always a given. Look at Hifi rush and possibly FF7 Rebirth.I hope Sony learns from this that you CAN make great games that sell well that are smaller in budget and come out more frequently
AstroBot 2 as a PS6 launch title is basically guaranteed at this point
Now meme Asobi higher and have multiple teams/projects. Build them into the entire future of SCEJ from the ashes of what was shut down
Imagine Asobi taking on the Zelda series for instance?
To be fair he's only ever seen metacritic going down from such a mark so was probably as happy a pig in shit that it started below 90.He was quick to post that 89 but never posted the updates. Another L by him.
7 years is a long ass time, but it's more than that: Switch is basically a beefed up PS360 with lots of ram, so the PS5 is more than one generation ahead in terms of power. The Digital Foundry video shows this quite well.Eh, Odyssey was also 7 years ago now. Both things can be valid.
Tears of the Kingdom was pretty unanimously a much much better BOTW and didn't score higher than BOTW.
It's a little pricey IMO. Right up my alley, but still waiting for sale. IGN said was 9 hours, start to finish?I'm hoping it sells as well as it has reviewed. It's not always a given. Look at Hifi rush and possibly FF7 Rebirth.
So, and I know this won't go over very well, but this score kinda disproves the Sony tax, Xbox tax, Nintendo tax thing.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
My mind says high 80s but my heart says 90 plus.
I'm interested to see if journalists are still on their woke tirade after concord and mark it down for not having pronouns etc
And it was the best PSVR game you could get apparently.Well, they did make a PSVR only game.
This game if it does well, will show all the purple haired they/it crowd that actually people don't care about characters having purple hair and mental challenges, they care about games being fun.How people can still care about xbox versus playstation in 2024 is beyond it me. Now its about amazing games made by passionate devs who care about gamers versus woke/vapid/trash/generic games and devs like concord
Deluxe edition? Think not you cheap ass mutha f@#%apffft....I am way ahead of you...
He's had a busy week review boosting Astro Bot@Ass of Can Whooping will be back tomorrow
Game will be an easy
80-84%
GAF is on pure cope thinking it will reach high 80's or even 90 on MC.
One can only hope man. I think every one of their studios should have 1 or 2 smaller teams working on smaller budget games like this. Like a constant game jam state.I hope Sony learns from this that you CAN make great games that sell well that are smaller in budget and come out more frequently
AstroBot 2 as a PS6 launch title is basically guaranteed at this point
Now make Asobi bigger and have multiple teams/projects. Build them into the entire future of SCEJ from the ashes of what was shut down
Imagine Asobi taking on the Zelda series for instance?
70-95 is my final prediction.
You can't claim victory when you cover a quarter of the entire range.
You can't claim victory when you cover a quarter of the entire range.
That's a big ass range.
I remain with my prediction, 75 or 95.
WHAT?!? What does Nintendo have to do with this? You played it yet? Mario is deserving of its high praise, as is this game. A 90+ score is nothing to sneeze at, and being a couple of points shy of a Nintendo game isn't worth making up shit over.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
You picked up the entire haystack and then act like you were spot on for getting the needle.
Analysis - Review - Astro Bot | Review Thread
I think you got this backwards, they will mark it down because it DOESN'T have genders, races ...etc plus not being Nintendo game 🤣 Idiotic thinking. Dustborn and Concord had “genders” and “races” and terrible meta critic scores.www.neogaf.com
Do i fucking rest my case or what?
You can't claim victory when you cover a quarter of the entire range.
Do you know the concept of humor?You picked up the entire haystack and then act like you were spot on for getting the needle.
I was being humorous too I just thought I would use a funny analogyDo you know the concept of humor?
I was being humorous too I just thought I would use a funny analogy
Well, there's no way around it, Nintendo definitely gets a bonus. Don't want the rabid fanboys to send hate and death threats your way for giving one of their flagship titles a perfectly fine score of 7 or 8.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
94 nowThe final score is not even 95 but 93 for fuck sake
I’ll never understand the allegiance to specific companies. I like Mario games because they’re good, not because they’re made by Nintendo. Whenever another company makes an awesome game, I celebrate and enjoy it.Well, there's no way around it, Nintendo definitely gets a bonus. Don't want the rabid fanboys to send hate and death threats your way for giving one of their flagship titles a perfectly fine score of 7 or 8.
What do you like 3D Mario so much for?I refuse to watch any review or video at this point since I don’t want to be spoiled, but I’m also so hyped that I can’t keep myself away from this thread.
It’s seriously so exciting that a non-Nintendo studio has produced a 3D Platformer on their level. I know I’m a broken record at this point, but 3D Marios are easily my favorite games, and I stand by the opinion that literally no other 3D platformer has ever come close to that quality.
This feels like a gift made just for me. I might call off work tomorrow lol.
Yes. You're wrong lmao. What a silly thing to think.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...
Now give this team Ape Escape!!!
Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Mario Odyssey is easily the most overrated 3D Mario platformer by far.Am I wrong for thinking if this were a Nintendo game it would be at around 97/98 MC?
Like i've heard a lot of people say it's better than Mario Odyssey for one...