Science, predicting the future better than any economist since 1981: http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...esting-a-climate-prediction-from-1981/255658/
I also hate when people turn "th" into "f" - so fumb instead of th-umb. Terrible!
Sega? Sega who?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck6hE2uCrPY
This is the worst
and by worst, I mean coping with Las Vegas without alcohol is probably impossible
I've only been here about 5 hours and I think I've already had my fill of Vegas
Science, predicting the future better than any economist since 1981: http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...esting-a-climate-prediction-from-1981/255658/
PS3 - Singstar The Wiggles for $1
Science, predicting the future better than any economist since 1981: http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...esting-a-climate-prediction-from-1981/255658/
Few things
1. leave Freo alone
2. From DSE I now have a few 3 month live subscriptions and an extra copy of kinect games rabbids alive and kicking and carnival games some crap or other. Did anyone happen to get a spare copy of Once upon a monster, would love it for my daughter and happy to trade
3. I skipped lost planet 2 but loved the first, did i miss out?
4. Did we ever get resolution on legends facebook date request?
I assume you're kidding, but that cooling stuff tends to be based on a fairly short period, where climate change is the change of long term tends.^^^^^^^^somethingsomethingglobalcoolingtemperaturehasn'trosesince1998
The double packs are cheap, the single games are not. Also unlike Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft do Platinum/Classic re-releases so you can get the exclusives really cheap on both consoles eventually. Gets them into more peoples hands and means a much higher attach rate for series than if you just left the price at $80 until the end of time. I have seen a lot more Nintendo titles dropping to around $30 than in the past though, still takes ages at the same time.uncharted 1 and 2 for 7 dollars? wat....
no evergreen titles for sony I guess >_>
The Monkey Dance? Yes indeed!There's a singstar wiggles, now I've seen everything. Does it include the hit song Monkey man?
We need a Shaneus stare up in this place asap.Was shaneus on channel 9 today interviewed about geelong train line delays?
There's a singstar wiggles, now I've seen everything.
Science, predicting the future better than any economist since 1981: http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...esting-a-climate-prediction-from-1981/255658/
You drink good, Rep. Come to Qld.
Have you really?
Forgot I was going out drinking today. At 4:30. I only woke up 40 minutes ago.
I wonder if drinking after being awake for four hours is anything like drinking in the morning.
Have you really?
is....
is that a real game? :O
is....
is that a real game? :O
is....
is that a real game? :O
The Monkey Dance? Yes indeed!
Science, predicting the future better than any economist since 1981: http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...esting-a-climate-prediction-from-1981/255658/
Is everyone pissed at the Mass Effect 3 ending because, orof the stupid fucking ghost childorthe stupid fucking Deus Ex 3 push-a-button endingor all of the above?the fact that choosing different options doesn't make a whole lot of difference
I think a predictable model of large scale human behaviour is more likely to come from science, yeah. Economics fails miserably at that.Another thing that occurred to me is that a scientist could probably predict the economy better than an economist to boot.
What was it then?None of the above.
But they use the same or similar fundamental models for predictions e.g. regressions, moving average, autoregressive etc.Another thing that occurred to me is that a scientist could probably predict the economy better than an economist to boot.
What was it then?
If a theory in science makes a prediction that turns out to be wrong, it's thrown out. It seems that when an economist gets a prediction wrong, they doggedly hold on to what they believe and go on making predictions. I'm talking strictly macroeconomics.But they use the same or similar fundamental models for predictions e.g. regressions, moving average, autoregressive etc.
Hence the irony of not doing anything about climate change for economic reasons.If anything, science is probably easier to predict than the economy.
Shepard dies. Or just that it is all very rushed and seems like it was written by someone different to the rest of the series. Certainly feels a little strange but I actually liked my ending. Just another slightly missed opportunity by some B+ grade writer
I think a predictable model of large scale human behaviour is more likely to come from science, yeah. Economics fails miserably at that.
But they use the same or similar fundamental models for predictions e.g. regressions, moving average, autoregressive etc.
If anything, science is probably easier to predict than the economy.
Is everyone pissed at the Mass Effect 3 ending because, orof the stupid fucking ghost childorthe stupid fucking Deus Ex 3 push-a-button endingor all of the above?the fact that choosing different options doesn't make a whole lot of difference
But at the end of the credits in my ending there was a scene where Shepard moves.
And did anyone actually expect him to live? I sure as hell didn't. The whole point was the self sacrifice, wasn't it?
I originally chose the Renegade ending (the red one where all synthetics are destroyed) as that was what I felt the psycho Shepard I'd been playing would have done (and that was the one in which Shepard lived for me), but watched the green synthesis one. It's virtually the same which ever you choose.
You think its worth going over to DSE now?
What was it then?
Paging Kübler-Ross.I believe in theIndoctrination theory
I believe in the, that it was planned by Bioware all along and they would have revealed the missing gaps and plot holes in an upcoming paid DLC.Indoctrination theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ythY_GkEBck Don't watch if you haven't finished the game.
If a theory in science makes a prediction that turns out to be wrong, it's thrown out. It seems that when an economist gets a prediction wrong, they doggedly hold on to what they believe and go on making predictions. I'm talking strictly macroeconomics.
RandomVince said:Do they though? Models Ive come across tend to be built on physics and physical parameters. The context of these models (eg for star formation or glacier flow) tend to be based on known, measured qualities and observation - predictions dont necessarily come from a simple regression analysis.
There are plenty of economists in the education sector that are free to pursue whatever research they like, because that's their job.Isn't that because scientists have the freedom of creating/testing their own models on whatever? Economists, e.g. in a bank, just apply models that have been around for ages and maybe make a few tweaks to it. I don't think there are many economists (that work in a bank or something) are trying to make their own model....actually I don't really know!
People make economic observations all the time though. Unemployment figures, GDP, inflation, and so forth.That's the difference I guess. You can make observations in science, but not really in the economy/finance where most of it's implied - like you can't go out and say I'm gonna go take a sample of risk and measure it.
I think this is a terrible idea.I believe in theIndoctrination theory
bought 4 TDK head sets for $5 each, diablo 2 expansion pack for $2 and brutal legend for ps3 and 360 $5 each
4 headsets!? Can I buy 1?
Are they good? I need a new set.