It's the thing now with hip young e-warriors.
- immigration is bad (europe a nightmare wasteland)
- muslims extra bad
- multicultralism failed = FACT
- cucks
- homosexual transgenders forcing agenda
- feminist sjws censoring everything
- "the left"
- more cucks
Nigh is the age of disillusioned alt right.
Doesn't really matter, just for the cameras right now. He'll form government in some form, and News Limited are printing 'Turnbull Wins' right now.I guess Turnbull can't afford to be seen as uncertain but this outright confidence in gaining the majority seems a bit odd.
Labor+Greens might have the senate? I don't know haven't done any numbers myself.Why do people think the ABCC not pass a joint sitting?
Won't NXT and One Nation vote for it?
It's completely safe because even if he can't he will still form minority government since he's the only one who can. At which point he will never mention stable majority government again
That's true, and a shame that numbering in order isn't counted as informal.
But still, forcing people to vote I think has a net positive. It forces far more people to get engaged in the political process than it does allow stupid people to have too much undue influence (I think...).
I don't understand, how come?
Why do people think the ABCC not pass a joint sitting?
Won't NXT and One Nation vote for it?
Labor can't get enough Crossbench to form a government and elect a speaker.
I'm not familiar with whom the crossbenchers usually ally with. On the AEC website, I see Greens, Katter, Xeneophone and Independents. I'm guessing all of them (except the Greens) would side with LNP?
That's a great idea actually, and easily doable for the house.There's a chance that's the ordering poeple mean though so you can't ban it. It's a shame we can't randomly order the listing per paper. So that random ordering just cancels out.
I'm not familiar with whom the crossbenchers usually ally with. On the AEC website, I see Greens, Katter, Xeneophone and Independents. I'm guessing all of them (except the Greens) would side with LNP?
Xenophon was interested but wanted some conditions about evidence and representation for those in front of ABCC. The libs noped it as well they are Libs.
ONP, who the hell knows? 4 or 5 racists that will run around screaming Halal and brown people. They'll probably fracture all over the place.
The other Independent (appropriately the Indi electorate, I forget her name) is apparently conservative so I think it's almost guaranteed The Coalition will get 3 of the 4 others. Labor will get Greens and who knows about Wilkie.Katter'll LNP, Wilkie probably won't play ball (One of the Independents), Xenophon might, and I'm not sure about the other independents
so what have we all learned and gained from today
My vote doesn't count for shit when most of WA is up the Coalition's arseso what have we all learned and gained from today
The other Independent (appropriately the Indi electorate, I forget her name) is apparently conservative so I think it's almost guaranteed The Coalition will get 3 of the 4 others. Labor will get Greens and who knows about Wilkie.
When people don't fill in all the boxes for the HoR ballot, do you still count the boxes they did fill it, or is that ballot discarded completely when declared informal?Apparently people didn't read the Green Card and only numbered 1-6 which is informal since FPV is mandatory in Lower House.
And so my faith in humanity drops yet further.
so what have we all learned and gained from today
so what have we all learned and gained from today
It's possible to have an election where both parties give victory speeches
They are considered informal votes and are equal to if nothing was filled in at all.When people don't fill in all the boxes for the HoR ballot, do you still count the boxes they did fill it, or is that ballot discarded completely when declared informal?
I have the NSW state election handbook and for the state election you continue to count a ballot as long as the voter's intention is clear. That sounds like a better idea to me.
When people don't fill in all the boxes for the HoR ballot, do you still count the boxes they did fill it, or is that ballot discarded completely when declared informal?
I have the NSW state election handbook and for the state election you continue to count a ballot as long as the voter's intention is clear. That sounds like a better idea to me.
how the fuck is pauline hanson still around. fucking qld.
That's true, and a shame that numbering in order isn't counted as informal.
But still, forcing people to vote I think has a net positive. It forces far more people to get engaged in the political process than it does allow stupid people to have too much undue influence (I think...).
so what have we all learned and gained from today
Xenophon was interested but wanted some conditions about evidence and representation for those in front of ABCC. The libs noped it as well they are Libs.
ONP, who the hell knows? 4 or 5 racists that will run around screaming Halal and brown people. They'll probably fracture all over the place.
So let's go with these ABC numbers for a bit.
72-66, with 7 in doubt.
Very unlikely Labor gets all 7: but if so it would be 72-73. Bandt and Wilkie will probably pledge interest in Labor, and Katter for Coalition. That leaves Xenophon and the other Independent, who would probably curry favor in joining Labor by showing their flexibility and honouring the incredible swing against LNP this election. Their alternative would be to risk instability by causing a deadlock and another election (or whatever other processes are involved).
Any less than 7, and the LNP will simply have the numbers on its side.
However ABC seems to be adding more and more seats back into their "In doubt" column so it seems unreliable to judge based on their predictions any more.
so what have we all learned and gained from today
Yeah, I would've thought they'd still try to count a ballot until the voter's intentions become unclear. For example, what about if they filled in all the squares but accidentally skip a number? Does that still make that entire ballot informal and not counted under FPV?NSW is OPV, not FPV. Let me try and find the saving provision for HoR federally.
Yeah, I would've thought they'd still try to count a ballot until the voter's intentions become unclear. For example, what about if they filled in all the squares but accidentally skip a number? Does that still make that entire ballot informal and not counted under FPV?
I agree. I know the major parties go on about how "disastrous" a hung Parliament would be, but with some relatively decent diplomats (eg Xenophon) holding the balance of power, some sense might be drilled into both sides.What a fun night for democracy. Maybe now these arseholes will be forced to negotiate and compromise and cooperate.
Thanks. That seems like a reasonable trade-off. Terrible that there's still so many informal votes, but better blank than a correctly filled in throwaway vote.As I understand Federal House saving: If there are 3 or more candidates then you can leave 1 box blank and preferences will continue to flow until a numbering error in the event that there's a numbering mistake.
That means the 1-6 is fine if there's 7 candidates but informal otherwise.
House Saving provisions are surprisingly weak.
The Senate Independents are going to skew conservative so maybe it's not going to be so bad for Turnbull.
so what have we all learned and gained from today
I expected an hour ago from the ABC numbers that the Coalition could get to 77 but from the ABC numbers it is going against that...
ABC's website saying the Coalition and Labor are both on 67, then in the Seats in Doubt the Coalition is listed as ahead in 5 of them and Labor is shown as ahead in 6. Coalition 72 vs Labor 73. If these figures pan out then the Coalition would just reach the minimum with all 4 of the non-green Others.
I don't much like their chance of getting Wilkie. But the postal results will tend to favour Coalition. Morrison was right about that. Pre-poll is likely less so simply because so many people do it now.