bobnowhere
Member
This seems really dumb but where is there a good, as neutral as possible breakdown of the CFA / Firey/ Union / Daniel Andrews thing?
I'm in Victoria and this has been bubbling away but since it's just been in the Herald Sun mostly I've just ignored it. Anytime they talk about Labor vs. Unions I'm just assuming 100% lies.
My view was (remembering I didn't really care since I knew I would be voting 1 Green / Labor above Liberal) Daniel Andrews seems to be about as not bad as you can expect a labor leader to be in 2016, and was making generally not bad decisions, and then there was some issues with the MFB (Paid) firey union and the CFA (volunteer) firey union and he kinda had to pick one, but his minister picked the other and now they hate him.
1. Is this even close to reality
2. What are the issues he is dealing with
3. Would the libs be even close to better with it?
4. Is it actually a reason people should be changing votes or is it dumb herald sun shit again
Not 100% sure what was going on but I believe it is something like this:
Basically the CFA is a bit of unorganised mob. Each depot operates like its own little fiefdom barely taking orders from up high and level of standards and training varied wildly. The Victorian government wanted to introduce professional firefighters on all firegrounds as commanders but as union membership is very high among the professionals this was wrongly interpreted as a union take over.
I suspect at this point the Liberal party and I imagine the IPA got involved and made a mountain out of a molehill for purely political purposes. Kennet's CFA hat was absolutely pathetic last night.
As for Labor in Victoria, Labor was already on a high in Victoria. No one expected them to win a handful of seats, maybe Corangamite and Dunkley at most though now they may still lose Batman, for other reasons, and Chisholm instead. Probably had a minor effect but it was overblown.