Kelly O'Dywer: "If I made a wild and unsubstantiated claim about you Tony, would you have to be interviewed to disprove it?"
By all means let's abolish the criminal justice system then since accusations have now suddenly become meaningless
Kelly O'Dywer: "If I made a wild and unsubstantiated claim about you Tony, would you have to be interviewed to disprove it?"
The best part is how her example doesn't even match the question. The asylum seekers are the ones making the claims of mistreatment and not being interviewed. No, the authorities mightn't leap straight to interrogating Tony Jones, but they'd probably want to hear from the person making the allegations in the first place.By all means let's abolish the criminal justice system then since accusations have now suddenly become meaningless
Wow. Floored.Tonight on Q&A:
WTF. No words.
came to post exactly the same thingOh lordy, Abbott is reintroducing Knighthoods. Sir John Howard incoming in 3...2...
If this means I get to joust him then I'm all for it.Oh lordy, Abbott is reintroducing Knighthoods. Sir John Howard incoming in 3...2...
I wish we had the American attitude towards free speech.
Oh lordy, Abbott is reintroducing Knighthoods. Sir John Howard incoming in 3...2...
By addressing only incitement to racial hatred, Brandis is winding back the vilification prohibition to cover a single and increasingly rare type of behaviour: the crude, public rantings of a racist. He fails to recognise, or maybe even comprehend, the pervasive, casual racism in Australian society that Race Discrimination Commissioner Tim Soutphommasane has identified.
The third part and perhaps most important of the proposed changes is the conduct that is explicitly permitted. Vilifying or intimidating public conduct that is done because of a persons race is prohibited, but it is allowed when it is done in the course of public discussion.
There is no qualification to this exception. Every other vilification law in Australia limits exceptions to conduct that is done reasonably and in good faith.
This throws out the baby, the bathwater and the bath. The exception is so wide to a prohibition that is so narrow that people will be able to offend, insult, humiliate and incite serious contempt or severe ridicule on the basis of race. They will be able to do so unreasonably and dishonestly, with impunity.
Those who enjoy freedom of expression must assess the limits on that freedom by an awareness of the harm that can be caused by it. This is philosopher John Stuart Mills classical liberal harm principle. Free speech regulators must be aware that members of a racial minority can live all day, every day, conscious of their different culture and heritage, their different skin colour, their accent, their different practices, customs and preferences.
No member of the Australian racial majority politicians, policymakers, opinion writers can understand what it is to have ones life defined by ones difference. When free speech characterises that difference as a deficiency a sign of inferiority offence is a real sense that is qualitatively different from any idea of offence that we in the majority can have.
It is not for us to say that someone who actually and, in their circumstances, reasonably feels offence that they should not, or that it is to be borne with resignation. For almost 20 years, federal racial vilification law has been admirably respectful of the lived reality of racial difference.
Human Rights Commissioner and noted classical liberal Tim Wilson distanced himself from Brandiss underlying rationale for the proposed changes: that people have a right to be bigots. He must now be similarly wary of Brandis' simplistic protection of bigotry in the name of free expression.
Medibank is being put up for sale.
They government accrued almost a billion in dividends from them since they went for-profit in 2011. $4 billion is fucking chump change.Medibank is being put up for sale.
Medibank is being put up for sale.
It is inevitable that pricing carbon pollution will become a permanent feature of the global economy.
Should the parliament repeal the price and replace it with the Direct Action slogan, Australia will be dismantling infrastructure that will have to be reconstructed again in a very short time period. There would be a significant cost to Australia in lost time, money, innovation and competitive advantage.
Senate inquiry concludes what everyone already knew, nobody will listen. That said I read bits of the full report and everything's pretty confined to it's party's section of the document.
http://christine-milne.greensmps.or.../direct-action-slogan-rejected-senate-inquiry
EDIT:
Also now we're getting a commissioner to tackle cyber-bullying... something's a bit off with this government's messaging...
Wow, the Daily Tele has actually just deleted their 3 month old article quoting Abbott saying he won't bring back knighthoods.
Just came back from a tutorial where we discussed social class and inequality.. and it ended into a discussion about how good the rich have got it and how unfair it is with lots of discontent towards the rich.University tutes are killing my vibe.
Somehow gets onto racism and a guy suggests refugees who come from the middle east and deserty places should live in the middle of Australia. I can't deal.
University tutes are killing my vibe.
Somehow gets onto racism and a guy suggests refugees who come from the middle east and deserty places should live in the middle of Australia. I can't deal.
MISOGYNY!Here we go. Labor going after the speaker.
MISOGYNY!
Jenkins also.Lol, just saw the highlights and Pyne was claiming that exact thing!
Interesting for all the weird regalia and ceremony and er... after hours stuff, Peter Slipper was a pretty good, straight down the middle speaker.
University tutes are killing my vibe.
Somehow gets onto racism and a guy suggests refugees who come from the middle east and deserty places should live in the middle of Australia. I can't deal.
Campbell Newman and his cabinet just got awarded a $70,000 payrise from an "independent body". There's the salary of a couple of public servants he just got done sacking.
The last minute cash grab before they're all thrown out on their arses.
See, what did I say? You just insulted the speaker, who is a woman. Therefore you are another typical left-wing misogynist.Even Peter van Onselen of The Australian was saying that Bishop is a biased piece of shit.
Lol, just saw the highlights and Pyne was claiming that exact thing!
Interesting for all the weird regalia and ceremony and er... after hours stuff, Peter Slipper was a pretty good, straight down the middle speaker.
Which uni xD
If it's Sydney uni I'm not surprised.
What subject? Any engineering orientated sustainable development subject I've done is filled with people that have that sort of opinion. You get to hear a lot of reprehensible opinions in those.
I once worked with a partner who unironically spent the first workshop telling an international student about his Dutch heritage and the glory days of the Dutch Empire. I don't think the international student really cared but it definitely made me feel uncomfortable to hear someone seriously talk about how amazing Dutch Imperialism was to someone with an Indonesian background.
Thankfully most human geographers I've met are not huge pieces of shit.
Campbell Newman and his cabinet just got awarded a $70,000 payrise from an "independent body". There's the salary of a couple of public servants he just got done sacking.
The last minute cash grab before they're all thrown out on their arses.
hahah oh wow
This was Audience Studies. Can't remember how we got onto the subject of racism but it included all the standards like 'we're not a racist nation because everywhere is racist!' and 'In France the police beat up arabs so point moot!'.
I almost worked up to replying but I was overcome by a feeling of malaise and disheartenment.
Newcastle actually. So it wasn't cashed up white guys, more white bogans.
.
Newcastle Uni ! What course was it ? If it was in a Politics course I would be kinda surprised they weren't shouted down as we are probably the most left leaning Uni.