I'm pretty sure the Libs started using it to counter the idea. Theoretically it's sort of true, the problem is that ASIC is a disturbingly good example of regulatory capture, they don't even really seem to be trying.
Then we must abolish it.
I'm pretty sure the Libs started using it to counter the idea. Theoretically it's sort of true, the problem is that ASIC is a disturbingly good example of regulatory capture, they don't even really seem to be trying.
Yeah, but since then they've been reminded that they stripped budget from ASIC, and they've stopped making those noises.I'm pretty sure the Libs started using it to counter the idea. Theoretically it's sort of true, the problem is that ASIC is a disturbingly good example of regulatory capture, they don't even really seem to be trying.
Then we must abolish it.
Thankfully Tonys hard right candidate wasn't the winner.
I'd prefer to get it working properly but I kinda suspect you're right , in that it would need severe changes to management and culture, this is the regulator that lost a letter in which a Bank reported they suspected issues in one of their divisions. Which is a plot line that belongs in an office sitcom not reality.
Abolishing a regulator smacks of the general libertarian logic of "there are some problems with these laws so we should do away with all laws ever" but it will never really be fixed unless there is better equality of wealth between regulator and regulatee. Basically concentration of wealth is what should be abolished.
For something like a captured regulator though it's very hard to clear out the connections, informal agreements and cultural practises that embed the capture without applying metaphorical fire. It doesn't help that people often argue in favor of regulatory capture because those are the people with the experience to do the job. An argument that's correct but sort of ignores the inherent flaws.
http://mashable.com/2016/04/12/telstra-marriage-equality
And the plebiscite date hasn't even been announced yet.
I swear this guy was grown in a vat at LNP headquarters
The $1000 fine is applied only if she breaks the good behaviour bond.Wow. Must have been the price of having the charges dropped/downgraded.
Edit: Looks like she got a $1000 fine and 1 month good behavior bond for pleading guilty and I imagine producing the little video!
I shudder every time I see or hear him.
The $1000 fine is applied only if she breaks the good behaviour bond.
Who is he? A young liberal?
Who is he? A young liberal?
The ABCC just went down in flames in the Senate.
For: Day, Lemonheld, Wang and Xenophon
Against: Lambie, The Brick, Madigan and Muir.
What a sad, pathetic and disingenuous use of Government for your own electoral means. 3 weeks and the vote is on the first day with no effort to negotiate, why am I not surprised?
Well its not like they had any interest in passing it. I hope they end up with an even more hostile senate.
Now comes the 10 week campaign. Thank god for add free streaming.
Hmm, nothing really surprising on the votes apart from maybe Xenophon's vote (he stands to make out like a bandit from a DD) .
I wonder how much Turnbulls gift to Pyne will hinder Xenophon.
I wonder how much Turnbulls gift to Pyne will hinder Xenophon.
Interesting how these things only happen to save Liberal Party jobs, not Australian manufacturing jobs.
Government for the sake of Government, not the country.
Now accepting double dissolution pun themed thread titles.
Might have an election thread up later tonight.
This one. This is the one.AusPoliGAF |Election 2016| Easy as ABCC
This one. This is the one.
This one. This is the one.
There's a joke somewhere about conservatives, abortions and not lasting a full term, but I can't think of the wording :/
The ABCC one works, though! But I think a more internationally appealing/understandable title would be best.
Liberal MP Ann Sudmalis could be dumped from her marginal seat before the election, after she accidentally signed a petition saying she would not vote for her state colleagues because of their views on council mergers.
After a turbulent weekend for the NSW branch of the party, which saw Bronwyn Bishop booted from her seat and Bob Baldwin announce his retirement, the party is looking at disendorsing Ms Sudmalis from the south coast seat of Gilmore, which she holds by a 3.8 per cent margin.
Ms Sudmalis yesterday wrote to NSW Premier Mike Baird to explain she had accidentally signed the petition, which opposed council amalgamations and stated an intention to vote against the honourable Shelley Hancock MP & Gareth Ward MP, as well as the government in the upper house at the next state election.
...
Libs are going to lose a shitload of their marginal seats this election. I take solace in the fact that Corangamite is apparently the most marginal in Australia and Sarah Henderson will be no longer, despite me not even being in that electorate.
If climate change is real, why we still got climate scientists?
If climate change is real, why we still got climate scientists?