Apparently this was a real sign at the recent Trump rally:
I guess that depends on what you mean by good or bad or how you are judging things. In terms of general discussion I tend to view things in terms of whether I enjoyed them and whether I would reccomend them to others. And with a binary good/bad system theres little wiggle room. But then I'm not a cultural critic so I tend to approach media less formally now than I did as a student in film classes. Its more like comparing take-out places. Now obviously this is not a suitable approach if I decided to start a media blog with formal reviews.
Of course that general point is problematic. I mean I didnt like what I saw of Ping Pong, or Madmen, or the Wire. So I'd have a hard time reccomending it to others (in part because in all three cases I only saw an episode or two). But its clear all three shows are well regarded by various people who arent idiots. So its clearly a matter of different tastes, which is fine. But it means I can't just say this show is bad because I didnt like it. I find its easier with flawed stuff I enjoyed, but that's in part because with those I watched (or played when it comes to games) all of it and so have more things to justify why I liked a show and feel its worth watching.
Not being a reviewer or anything means I can just bail on anything I'm not enjoying and so I have less to talk about there and I also miss out on things that leave a bad first impression on me that might turn out t actuall be worth my time.
When I say "good"/"bad" I'm more talking about general principles of writing and direction. Like pacing, characterization, tone, how material is contextualized, logical flow, framing, etc. Ostensibly, what is "good pacing", as an example, has a degree of subjectivity to it and people will often straight up disagree on a particular work but I believe there is still a minimum baseline that most can agree to once they have been exposed to enough media to calibrate themselves well.
A product can succeed commercially or garner significant popularity even if its lacking in those areas (Twilight, Transformers Live Action moves, etc.). Furthermore I, just as with everybody such as yourself, have also failed to enjoy many works I know are held in high critical acclaim. However, I still feel confident in my ability to separate what I like and why I liked something from how well it might meet certain critical metrics. Sometimes they are one in the same and sometimes they are not. "I understand why this is good and held in high esteem but I didn't enjoy it" and "I very much enjoyed this media even though I'm aware and agree its critically flawed in these respects" are things I'm very willing to say.