hosannainexcelsis
Member
As I said, it all makes logical sense. Everything (a few plot holes aside) comes from what came before. But it's very much an artificial construct, an unbelievably specific puzzle, much like the lab itself. It only works because it operates under its own set of rules that it defines beforehand as completely distinct from our world. That makes it an interesting game, but limits how meaningful it can feel as a story.
There's a sharp difference between those who write mysteries as clever puzzles and those who write them as vehicles to explore the human psyche. It's rare that you'll get both at the same time. Either you have, as in Agatha Christie's writing, shallow characters who are manipulated as pieces on a chessboard to set up the desired twist, or you have, as in Dorothy Sayers' Gaudy Night, a mystery which is almost an afterthought to the experiences and emotions of the characters.