• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Axios (Stephen Totilo) Lawyers: Email proves Microsoft’s ABK bid is designed to elimination (Update: MS claims it was a "thought experiment")

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Still not explaining anything about how if you say I'll make a building then make the building the two are not connected.
Alright an electrician put wires in the wall but then forgot the connect them to the fusebox and the outlets, just like you fail to make the connections.
Now imagine Sony's head saying they want to destroy MS then goes to buy take2 and EA but when antitrust inquire they say it is to bring games to more players would you believe them?Then neither should FTC and CMA.


Mate, I'm sorry but you're just arguing for arguments sake, I don't know how to accurately reply to your building metaphors.

I've said it in extremely clear words that this could have been about anything, without context and seeing the redacted comment we cannot say one way or the other.

But the one thing we *can* say is that the original reporting of the thing was not correct, even the article/twee author himself has apologized for wording it that way.
 
Last edited:
Alright an electrician put wires in the wall but then forgot the connect them to the fusebox and the outlets, just like you fail to make the connections.
Now imagine Sony's head saying they want to destroy MS then goes to buy take2 and EA but when antitrust inquire they say it is to bring games to more players would you believe them?Then neither should FTC and CMA.

Do painters next.
 

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
Mate, I'm sorry but you're just arguing for arguments sake, I don't know how to accurately reply to your building metaphors.

I've said it in extremely clear words that this could have been about anything, without context and seeing the redacted comment we cannot say one way or the other.

But the one thing we *can* say is that the original reporting of the thing was not correct, even the article/twee author himself has apologized for wording it that way.
Maybe you don't know how to replky to my analogy because it perfectly explain MS intentions by buying zeni and ABK but it's Ok you always have trouble criticizing MS we all know it.
Do painters next.
I feel like you'd still wouldn't understand what's obvious to anybody but you two.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
Mate, I'm sorry but you're just arguing for arguments sake, I don't know how to accurately reply to your building metaphors.

I've said it in extremely clear words that this could have been about anything, without context and seeing the redacted comment we cannot say one way or the other.

But the one thing we *can* say is that the original reporting of the thing was not correct, even the article/twee author himself has apologized for wording it that way.

No we can't say that. We haven't seen the email. Right? That was YOUR position.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
No we can't say that. We haven't seen the email. Right? That was YOUR position.




PFtLQcg.png
 

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
Hey don’t forget the guy who made the tweet and got this all started, he also understands logic and reason. Feel free to post on his feed letting him know he’s wrong.
So showing that it is a general intention is not really supporting your point.
Because the whole yeah their intentions showed with Zenimax but totally won't happen with ABK is not really a strong point.
 

graywolf323

Member
Pretty much, yeah. They, effectively, forced Nintendo to diversify in order to continue to find success, and Sony still chase them wherever possible. Nintendo made the DS? Sony made the PSP. Nintendo made the 3DS? Sony made the PS Vita. Nintendo made the Wii? Sony made the Move. Nintendo made the Wii U / Switch? Sony's still trying to make second-screen gaming happen for their console. I'd wager there's more than just chasing trends there.
you do realize Sony was working on the Move long before the Wii exists, they were talking about that tech during the PS2 days

and I’m not sure what your point about DS/3DS vs. PSP/Vita is since it’s not like Sony ever put in 3D or dual screens?

also Sony’s had second screen gaming stuff since the PS3 days BEFORE Wii U/Switch (I remember there being an app for Beyond: Two Souls on PS3…)

edit: found an interview where Dr. Richard Marks talks about this stuff and EyeToy on PS2

 
Last edited:

MacReady13

Member
My avatar keeps aging like fine wine.

I will shut up for thread's sanity, but man, there so much bs going on MS right now.
You know I hate to keep going on about this, I really do but, geez I wish we had the Microsoft from the 360 days (before Kinect). They were basically all about the console and the games. They had the best 3rd party versions of games. They were beating Sony at their own game. Why they tried this new angle with game pass and buying companies is beyond me. They have almost completely lost me with their bullshit now.
 
So showing that it is a general intention is not really supporting your point.
Because the whole yeah their intentions showed with Zenimax but totally won't happen with ABK is not really a strong point.

Of course it supports my point. A general strategy and a specific move are two different things, not to even mention the time gap. But this is all irrelevant now anyway, your head is so deep in the sand that the twitter guy who made the tweet that set this all off is literally spelling it out for you and you don’t want to listen.
 

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
Of course it supports my point. A general strategy and a specific move are two different things, not to even mention the time gap. But this is all irrelevant now anyway, your head is so deep in the sand that the twitter guy who made the tweet that set this all off is literally spelling it out for you and you don’t want to listen.
You are the one saying they have a strategy but since it is 3 years later time has passed....Guess what they plan years in advance.Do you think they aren't already researching next gen ?Just like you believe their aquisition is all about bringing games to more people I guess?
 

Topher

Identifies as young
I appreciate that you value what I said so much, but the author of the article / tweet has said it was worded erroneously and has apologized for it.

I find it interesting that you don't put any value on your own words at all. What part of “they still can’t divulge the contents of the email” are you not understanding? And how can you personally reconcile that with your previous posts where you were so adamant?
 

AlphaDump

Gold Member
If this claim is being made legally and Microsoft has already responded to the press clarifying a date why wouldn't they also outright deny it in their press response?

Also, making a claim like that in court is very easily proven wrong, so where the fuck is Microsoft’s legal team response other than to hide it?

My questions are rhetorical. Microsoft and their shills are all full of shit.
 
You are the one saying they have a strategy but since it is 3 years later time has passed....Guess what they plan years in advance.Do you think they aren't already researching next gen ?Just like you believe their aquisition is all about bringing games to more people I guess?

The acquisition was to put themselves in a better position to compete and make a lot of money. I’ve said that already.

You were so eager to take the tweet as gospel and truth, the guy who made it has since come around to reality. Join him or continue living in Crazyland, the choice is yours, friend.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I find it interesting that you don't put any value on your own words at all. What part of “they still can’t divulge the contents of the email” are you not understanding? And how can you personally reconcile that with your previous posts where you were so adamant?

I don't know why you're assuming my words about not knowing the redacted contents are different. We still don't know the exact contents of the email, we likely never will. It feels like you're less interested in discussing this change in context and more focused on trying to 'gotcha bitch' me in your last couple of posts.

The entire context of the thing reported as the primary talking point in the Acti acquisition, as the article originally reported, has changed now that we know this supposed email is from years before any Acti acquisition talks began in the first place. Totilo admitted it was worded inaccurately, he has apologized, let's move on.
 
Last edited:

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
The acquisition was to put themselves in a better position to compete and make a lot of money. I’ve said that already.

You were so eager to take the tweet as gospel and truth, the guy who made it has since come around to reality. Join him or continue living in Crazyland, the choice is yours, friend.
Really ?Because you weren't saying that a few minutes ago.

[...]It doesn’t change that the ABK move is a move to try and bury Sony, [...]
Maybe the fact that there is only you and adam defending this should tell you how much the two are related.

Because you are the only 2 that don't make the connection.
But I'll just stop talking with you guys it is 4 am time to sleep maybe once you both have given this a deep thorough thinking you'll understand what is obvious to everyone else here.
 
Really ?Because you weren't saying that a few minutes ago.


Maybe the fact that there is only you and adam defending this should tell you how much the two are related.

Because you are the only 2 that don't make the connection.
But I'll just stop talking with you guys it is 4 am time to sleep maybe once you both have given this a deep thorough thinking you'll understand what is obvious to everyone else here.

Bury Sony and better compete mean the same thing to me. Again, the end goal for all three of these companies is to dominate the others. Please tell me you understand this.

What exactly am I defending here? My position was that we don’t need email confirmation to know MS wants to bury Sony. They’re direct competitors. Then I found it funny that even though the guy who tweeted the email stuff later apologized and cleared up that it wasn’t related to ABK, some of you still can’t help yourselves.

Sweet dreams, let your brain rest. Be better, friend.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
So all this fuss was for nothing? Tbh without knowing the content of the Email all of this it's just waste of time.


Correct. We don't know the exact contents of the supposed email, the only thing we know for sure is that it was written in 2019, long before the Acti merger was a thing. So a direct parallel between these two specific events cannot be drawn. The ABK bid was not designed as per the supposed email in 2019. The bid wasn't even a thing then.


HfeZ9TK.jpg
 
Last edited:

ZehDon

Member
you do realize Sony was working on the Move long before the Wii exists, they were talking about that tech during the PS2 days
Sweet, so they released the Move on the PS2 then. Or at least, surely before the Wii released. Right?
and I’m not sure what your point about DS/3DS vs. PSP/Vita is since it’s not like Sony ever put in 3D or dual screens?
Nintendo established the handheld market, and Sony tried to muscle in using the same strategy it used in the home console space - the PS Vita established the pattern of Sony's handheld strategy. Sony chased Nintendo where Nintendo found success.
also Sony’s had second screen gaming stuff since the PS3 days BEFORE Wii U/Switch (I remember there being an app for Beyond: Two Souls on PS3…)
You're thinking of tablet-based ancillary second-screen gaming. I'm referring to the ability to play the same game on a TV or a second screen, like the Wii U / Switch established.
 
Last edited:

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
Really ?Because you weren't saying that a few minutes ago.


Maybe the fact that there is only you and adam defending this should tell you how much the two are related.

Because you are the only 2 that don't make the connection.
But I'll just stop talking with you guys it is 4 am time to sleep maybe once you both have given this a deep thorough thinking you'll understand what is obvious to everyone else here.
Defending? None of us know what is in the email, there is nothing to 'defend'.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
Fair enough, we know via MS Lawyers replying on the matter.

We know that is what a Microsoft rep said. Nothing more.

Eh would need to see this email in it's entirety. We should keep in mind that one person's stated desire doesn't necessarily reflect the goal of the company.

Realistically speaking how would Xbox even accomplish this?

By buying Bethesda and Activision Blizzard King (possibly others) and making their content exclusive to Xbox.
 
Last edited:

unlurkified

Member
Yeah but can they really eventually put PS out of business with the AB purchase? Seems unlikely to me. Losing CoD is huge, but not back-breaking. All the other AB franchises aren’t big enough, maybe with the exception of Diablo, but that’s only a once in a decade+ release.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
Yeah but can they really eventually put PS out of business with the AB purchase? Seems unlikely to me. Losing CoD is huge, but not back-breaking. All the other AB franchises aren’t big enough, maybe with the exception of Diablo, but that’s only a once in a decade+ release.

It would really damage them, hard. A lot of profit there yearly, like a lot lot.

Put them out of business? In some respects, maybe. Basically trying to take PlayStation out of the multiplayer scene. There’s a domino effect here, and most of the people who think Sony can just go get that money somewhere else are probably the ones used to daddy MS bailing Xbox over and over again. But just like we’ve seen with Xbox, you might find the money but the audience might still go missing.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom