Lord Frieza
Member
For example
Well, I don't have any contacts in Nashville, but I can search around. There might be a Organizing Protests for Dummies
For example
Well, I don't have any contacts in Nashville, but I can search around. There might be a Organizing Protests for Dummies
I am told the pressure on @POTUS from Ivanka to stay in Paris has been intense.
So, if it might take a few years to effectuate and all, and assuming Trump might finish his first term but won't get a second one, what keeps the 'next' President from just reversing all this?
This reads like HAIL HYDRA.
https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/869890727861465088
Another decision that Ivanka tries to influence and nothing will happen.
You'd really think even seeing all this immediate backlash from all different sides would make him want to stick with it. It'd be an easy win for him and the pundits would be talking about how this is the day Trump became president.
Man, it would be so interesting to have a new election just to see how many people, knowing what they do now, would still vote for Trump.
Not even to get someone else elected, just to see the results.
Dammit, America really fucked up big time. And now we'll all have to suffer the consequences.
I hope every country in the Paris agreement will put an eco-tax on all American products as punishment, we can't stand the shit pulled by the GOP anymore. Our planet's worth more than that.
Nice job weakening the US's ability to make treaties
Fat chance any nation takes us seriously again next time there's a treaty.
Those coal jobs still won't be coming back btw.
By bringing in more jobs to the coal and oil industry is what I'm guessing they'll go with.
Actually, I fear that this is a major motivation for this dick move, aka creating or bringing back jobs for his target demographic.
It's time for Europe, China, India, Japan, Korea, and Brazil to impose sanctions on the US. Target the fossil fuel industry specifically.
Well, of course it is. The problem is withdrawing from the Paris deal won't restore those jobs at all. It's not as if the decline of the coal industry started a year and a half ago.
Well, of course it is. The problem is withdrawing from the Paris deal won't restore those jobs at all. It's not as if the decline of the coal industry started a year and a half ago.
Today, I am genuinely angry at the citizens of the USA.
All of them.
Not just the ones that voted for him, nor the orange turd himself, but every single one.
It's irrational, it's unfair, but I can't help it.
Fuck all of this.
Today, I am genuinely angry at the citizens of the USA.
All of them.
Not just the ones that voted for him, nor the orange turd himself, but every single one.
It's irrational, it's unfair, but I can't help it.
Fuck all of this.
The interesting thing is, most of the energy companies in the US are for the Paris deal.
Have people tried asking Trump 11 times to stay with the deal?
Today, I am genuinely angry at the citizens of the USA.
All of them.
Not just the ones that voted for him, nor the orange turd himself, but every single one.
It's irrational, it's unfair, but I can't help it.
Fuck all of this.
So really just blame the shameful people in Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania...Just want to remind people that America election Clinton by a very wide margin on the scale of millions of people.
They still failed to convince him so sanctions are fair game. Tax every fossil fuel dollar that leaves the US. Make American coal, oil, and gas as uncompetitive as possible.
Lastly, for the US'ers claiming that the states and cities are doing much more even without you federal government: we've seen Trump pulling tricks nobody would've allowed before, what would keep him from forcing states and cities to use coal or put taxes on green technology while subsidizing his 'clean coal'? I know there is something in your constitution that doesn't allow the federal government to intervene with the states or something like that, but again ... he has done something crazy things already (+ 33 governors are R, right?).
Headlines are outpacing POTUS (once again). I'm told Trump hasnt made a final decision on Paris as of this AM & has climate meetings today.
So, the pledges from the Paris agreement would lead to a temperature increase of around 3.3°C. The american pledges would mean a reduction with 0.1 to 0.3°C. So without the US we could get 3.6°C ... Either way that's still more than the "well below 2°C" pledge. So is this so much more disastrous for the world?
On the other side, it is ofcourse an open door for other countries to slow down their efforts, which could only make it worse. But maybe this could be an incentive to the rest of the world to up the efforts and really reach the 2°C mark?
Lastly, for the US'ers claiming that the states and cities are doing much more even without you federal government: we've seen Trump pulling tricks nobody would've allowed before, what would keep him from forcing states and cities to use coal or put taxes on green technology while subsidizing his 'clean coal'? I know there is something in your constitution that doesn't allow the federal government to intervene with the states or something like that, but again ... he has done something crazy things already (+ 33 governors are R, right?).
Does Nashville have a Facebook presence? Do you have contacts elsewhere in the US to orchestrate something. I know it seems futile but we also agree that doing nothing is also no option
Last year, we moved from Northern Colorado to South Florida. Granted, we didn't go the most direct route (Colorado -> Dallas -> New Orleans -> Florida), but the distance we traveled would be the European equivalent of driving from Inverness, Scotland to Constanta, Romania on the Black Sea.
It's not just a simple on and off switch where if you're above 2 degrees, you're fucked. There are degrees of fucked here.So, the pledges from the Paris agreement would lead to a temperature increase of around 3.3°C. The american pledges would mean a reduction with 0.1 to 0.3°C. So without the US we could get 3.6°C ... Either way that's still more than the "well below 2°C" pledge. So is this so much more disastrous for the world?