sssh don't wanna get banned too do yah?EvaPlusMinus said:Wow, he seriously got banned?
Got some effed up mods here.
abacab driver said:He has to mean the blueprint room/chop shop place..because the latest gameplay video clearly shows vehicle editing on the fly w/ instant results.
oo Kosma oo said:From the interview it basicly sounds like:
Banjo = Banjo + Freedom + Lego
I can definately get excited for that.
rune_74 said:This is the only site I have been on where they ban someone and not comment on the ban.
Huh? Rare has 2 of the greatest shooters ever made created by them.... and 1 okay one.EvaPlusMinus said:Rare can't make shooters.
rune_74 said:This is the only site I have been on where they ban someone and not comment on the ban. Seems suspicious. Especailly after the fight in the game informer thread (where I think the mod was wrong but oh well.) I saw nothing in this thread ban worthy.
The game looks great, there are the usual suspects slammingi t of course. BUt to me it looks fun.
skip said:it's always so binary with you people.
George K. said:Please, since you really care, do read the interview. It's with the guy that invented Banjo in the first place, after all.
How do you think the Banjo hardcore will react to the changes?
Mayles: I think the generation of players that have played Banjo before are probably going to be shocked to start with. They're probably going to look at it and say, 'Hang on a sec, this isn't the Banjo I was expecting. What have you done? You've ruined it!'
But then hopefully, in a very short space of time, they'll be able to see what we've done and like it. You're never going to be able to change people's opinions of the old games and how they felt at the time. Obviously you're going to get a certain amount of rose-tinted glasses looking back on the old game being this wonderful masterpiece and nothing was ever wrong with it.
jacobs34 said:Do you know if Garnett actually played the game or was just shown the game? This seems like a game you need to play to fully grasp kind of like LBP, just my opinion though.
Linkzg said:yeah, but I am questioning which one is apparently not as fast and fun. I don't think the chop shop stuff really matters if it is slow (and they clearly sped it up in the video), but if it is the ingame stuff we saw when they put to hovercraft back together, that is a problem. The video did show that part to be really simple without issue, so I just assume it is the chop shop or whatever.
You missed the part where he went ballistic because someone showed footage of getting a secret egg in BK1 even though 'such a thing couldn't happen'. And he was making fun of people for 'not knowing anything about BK'.Coverly said:late by a couple pages because this thread moved so fast.
Crushed gets banned for defending a game in a non-inflammatory language(at least by his last few posts) while duckroll craps all over the too human thread with impunity? What is this, bizarro world?
thisisnot360gafdude.gif
skip said:It's always so binary with you people.
Amir0x said:They comment on the ban - to the person being banned, on their ban message. It is not important that you see the reason for the ban.
beerbelly said:God damn it. The vehicles really ruin the look of the game. Otherwise, it looks like the best console game technically.
Amir0x said:not to go all Crushed on you, but how exactly do the vehicles ruin what the game is doing technically?
Amir0x said:i've seen some of your ban messages, if you don't get why you're banned you're probably not thinking about it very hard![]()
harSon said:I always get a witty remark and typically remain relatively clueless as to why I was banned :/
I'm glad Rare didn't stop making changes.How do you think the Banjo hardcore will react to the changes?
Mayles: I think the generation of players that have played Banjo before are probably going to be shocked to start with. They're probably going to look at it and say, 'Hang on a sec, this isn't the Banjo I was expecting. What have you done? You've ruined it!'
But then hopefully, in a very short space of time, they'll be able to see what we've done and like it. You're never going to be able to change people's opinions of the old games and how they felt at the time. Obviously you're going to get a certain amount of rose-tinted glasses looking back on the old game being this wonderful masterpiece and nothing was ever wrong with it.
That sounds fantastic. Everybody should read this preview before postings bs.Agent Icebeezy said:
Jtyettis said:I remember one of mine. Although I think it's been close to a year now since the last. Something like, slow it down a bit, hehe.
Oliver.S said:That sounds fantastic. Everybody should read this preview before postings bs.
jacobs34 said:Do you know if Garnett actually played the game or was just shown the game? This seems like a game you need to play to fully grasp kind of like LBP, just my opinion though.
BenjaminBirdie said:Personally, from what I saw, I didn't expect it to be that fast and easy. I'm hoping there'll be some thought necessary and you'll actually be considering the best place to put things and how to tackle things.
It seems like they're taking the same approach as the "split" Viva Pinata 2. There's the accessible version of the game where you can play with only premade contraptions, or you can do it your own way and really mess around with stuff.
Agent Icebeezy said:EVeryone that has played the game has loved it. That is where a lot of my excitement comes from.
What people? The half of the people who have been complaining in this thread. It would make as much sense for me to ask what people asked for a change.BenjaminBirdie said:What people?
Seriously, what percentage of the marketplace out there is clamoring for a carbon copy return to the BK universe? Wouldn't a new approach that could potentially appeal to a newer demographic be better?
Dictating development based on nostalgic ideals seems really backward to me.
harSon said:I think I got banned for saying Sony PR (Or any PR for that matter) cannot be trusted![]()
Linkzg said:it also seems like they have things going on where if you put a small propeller on a big object, it would only cause it fall slower, so it does seem to get as deep as that.
MisterHero said:You missed the part where he went ballistic because someone showed footage of getting a secret egg in BK1 even though 'such a thing couldn't happen'. And he was making fun of people for 'not knowing anything about BK'.
He just needed a break. Let it be.
FatalT said:
HK-47 said:Thats the way all previews are.
BenjaminBirdie said:Yeah, that's the weird thing about Garnett's impressions. It's like, "Yeah, Erector Sets are about as popular as mud. Meanwhile Legos are as popular as ever, and Bionicles are still a huge draw to kids."
JKBii said:What people? The half of the people who have been complaining in this thread. It would make as much sense for me to ask what people asked for a change.
Let's say you aren't interested in playing a typical platformer. That's fine, but a lot of people are. How do you solve this problem? You just don't call it Banjo Kazooie. Use a new IP and then people will judge the game entirely based on how it plays.
Amir0x said:They comment on the ban - to the person being banned, on their ban message. It is not important that you see the reason for the ban.
Amir0x's ban message said:you are such a twerd
Miniboss1232 said:If your game gets a bad preview, you should just cancel the project immediately.
Linkzg said:it also seems like they have things going on where if you put a small propeller on a big object, it would only cause it fall slower, so it does seem to get as deep as that.
oo Kosma oo said:I think you lost me, you mean his weird stance: LBP fuck yeah, Banjo vehicles UGH NO?
HK-47 said:Thats the way all previews are.
CurseoftheGods said:I didn't realize that being a "twerd" was a violation of the Terms of Service. I sure will try to avoid it since it's apparently worth a 3 month suspension.