Ah, so despite the title including vs., they'll probably get slightly annoyed at each other and then fight some greater evil in this movie?That's the explanation, actually: They almost never fight for longer than five minutes before they learn that they need to team up/be friends.
Ah, so despite the title including vs., they'll probably get slightly annoyed at each other and then fight some greater evil in this movie?
meanwhile, on Idris Elba's twitter:
no, sadly it is not confirmation of anything
And driving around in a tank destroying the city and flipping over cop cars doesn't either. Batman was a big ol' douche. Superman just did it on a bigger scale.
but Superman didn't do most of the destroying.....
http://batman-news.com/2013/12/04/ben-affleck-batman-differs-christian-bales-internet-backlash/PLAYBOY: When Warner Bros. named you Batman, the internet exploded with hostility. After climbing back from career adversity to win the best picture Oscar for Argo, was your initial reaction more Not Again or Screw You?
AFFLECK: It wasnt either, really. I expected that reaction. Warner Bros. told me, You should know what youre getting into. They showed me the reactions to other folks who had been cast in these roles. They said this is how it tends to play out initially.
PLAYBOY: What convinced you?
AFFLECK: When they asked if I would be Batman, I told them I dont see myself in the role and I was going to have to beg off. They said Id fit well into how they were going to approach the character and asked me to look at what the writer-director, Zack Snyder, was doing. The stuff was incredible.
PLAYBOY: Why?
AFFLECK: It was a unique take on Batman that was still consistent with the mythology. It made me excited. All of a sudden I had a reading of the character. When people see it, it will make more sense than it does now or even than it did to me initially.
PLAYBOY: How will your Batman differ from the others, particularly the one played by Christian Bale?
AFFLECK: I dont want to give away too much, but the idea for the new Batmanis to redefine him in a way that doesnt compete with the Bale and Chris NolanBatman but still exists within the Batman canon. It will be an older and wiser version, particularly as he relates to Henry Cavills Superman character.
PLAYBOY: How much did the hostile fan reaction bother you?
AFFLECK: I understand Im at a disadvantage with the internet. If I thought the result would be another Daredevil, Id be out there picketing myself. [laughs] Why would I make the movie if I didnt think it was going to be good and that I can be good in it?
PLAYBOY: George Clooney kept a photo of himself as Batman on his office wall as a reminder of what can happen when you take a role for money and fame. If you had such a photo in your office, which movie would you go with?
AFFLECK: Id probably have two or three. [laughs] Itd be tough to choose. The only movie I actually regret is Daredevil. It just kills me. I love that story, that character, and the fact that it got fucked up the way it did stays with me. Maybe thats part of the motivation to do Batman.
Playboy (of all places) has a really good but short interview with Affleck about the internet hate and why he took the part. For once, the questions are good and the answers are real answers
http://batman-news.com/2013/12/04/ben-affleck-batman-differs-christian-bales-internet-backlash/
Playboy (of all places) has a really good but short interview with Affleck about the internet hate and why he took the part. For once, the questions are good and the answers are real answers
http://batman-news.com/2013/12/04/ben-affleck-batman-differs-christian-bales-internet-backlash/
Gal Gadot? Yes please!
So he doesn't regret Surviving Christmas or Gigli, the movies that effectively ended his acting career, but he regrets Daredevil which was actually a decent movie and a modest hit?
Sounds like he's really playing it up for the fanboys here.
meanwhile, on Idris Elba's twitter:
no, sadly it is not confirmation of anything
This is a great interview! Affleck has always come off like a great guy. It's just that from the sound of this, they're really committing to the older and more confrontational batman, which bothers me. Every fan out there prefers Bats and Supes working together instead of fighting. I really don't get the appeal of starting out the cinematic universe with these characters at odds. As friends with different philosophies, they're fun. When DC plays them as polar opposites with a last man standing mentality, it always ends badly.
This is a great interview! Affleck has always come off like a great guy. It's just that from the sound of this, they're really committing to the older and more confrontational batman, which bothers me. Every fan out there prefers Bats and Supes working together instead of fighting. I really don't get the appeal of starting out the cinematic universe with these characters at odds. As friends with different philosophies, they're fun. When DC plays them as polar opposites with a last man standing mentality, it always ends badly.
Anyone else bothered about not getting a proper Batman solo movie first? Seems like he's being relegated to second billing. I want another Batman origins movie coz TDKR sucked donkey balls.
Anyone else bothered about not getting a proper Batman solo movie first? Seems like he's being relegated to second billing. I want another Batman origins movie coz TDKR sucked donkey balls.
Anyone else bothered about not getting a proper Batman solo movie first? Seems like he's being relegated to second billing. I want another Batman origins movie coz TDKR sucked donkey balls.
I'm bothered by the fact Superman can't have a sequel without more shoving batman down our throats.
Gal Gadot? Yes please!
I'm bothered by the fact Superman can't have a sequel without more shoving batman down our throats.
same
But MOS proved that this Superman by himself is boring as shit. I'd rather see a clusterfuck of DC throwing everything in than turn out a movie as boring as MOS was.
But MOS proved that this Superman by himself is boring as shit. I'd rather see a clusterfuck of DC throwing everything in than turn out a movie as boring as MOS was.
No. We've seen his origin enough. And this is supposed to be Superman's franchise.
MOS proved that with horrible writing Superman by himself is boring as shit.
Y'know, I can agree with points like "bad pacing" and "characters not fully fleshed out" but boring? No, I can't even fathom how even someone who hated the movie can find MoS boring.
I'm bothered by the fact Superman can't have a sequel without more shoving batman down our throats.
It would take an actor like Idris Elba to make John Stewart a remotely interesting character.
Warner is trying to shortcut their way to setting up a Justice League movie. This is the only way they can do it.