triplestation
Member
Anti-grav.
iced4life3???
Anti-grav.
If they're going to be making these movies until 2020 or whatever, shouldn't they invest in some hair transplants or something?
If they're going to be making these movies until 2020 or whatever, shouldn't they invest in some hair transplants or something?
They can always cg it.A windows peak is cool but Cavill's unevenness makes his looks bad IMO.
man the hair is REALLY starting to bug me.
man the hair is REALLY starting to bug me.
man the hair is REALLY starting to bug me.
man the hair is REALLY starting to bug me.
This really, really saddens me.
Don't worry, they'll CG in the hairline later.
Superman doesn't recede.but Clark Kent does
Every time I see this movie talked about outside of movie sites it's referred to as the "Batman movie". It sucks.
Pft, that CGI joke sounds familiar.
PFT.
Did you stop to think that maybe the gif is just cutting off the "Superman v." part? Unless you're just talking about the fact the gif was cut that way.
A widows peak is cool.
Well considering the movie is called Batman v Superman, and not Superman v Batman, no.
But I mean, if I can make that mistake I'm sure a news crew could as well. I wanna see the original video.
Superman gets to play second fiddle in the sequel to his movie. What a wonderful way to show that DC isn't all about Batman.
Yeah, I'm bitter.
I didn't know we'd already gotten plot details.
This isn't Man of Steel 2, just as it isn't Batman Begins (again)What do you mean? That he isn't second fiddle or this isn't a MoS sequel?
This isn't Man of Steel 2, just as it isn't Batman Begins (again)
That movie will come, but for now this is what we have.
I dont think the film will be heavily slanted towards one or the other tbh
No, no, no they've fucked up Superman's Hair part, scientifically
Read #4
http://www.cracked.com/article_20779_5-seemingly-insignificant-things-that-make-people-like-you.html
http://www.truemirror.com/HairPartTheory(c)2001TMCInc.pdf
For Man of Steel it was "How does Superman shave?"
For BVS it's "Why would he cut his hair like that?"
This isn't Man of Steel 2, just as it isn't Batman Begins (again)
That movie will come, but for now this is what we have.
I dont think the film will be heavily slanted towards one or the other tbh
http://youtu.be/EOJj2zw2goM
The mission is to go from MoS to BvS to Justice League... and you can't get there unless Superman isn't a rookie anymore.
To date, we know of far more Superman elements being in this film than Batman elements. It has MoS's supporting cast, two Superman locales (Smallville & Metropolis), a Superman villain, new supporting cast whose involvement in the story is largely tied to the events of MoS (like the senator Holly Hunter is playing), and we know that ultimately the film ends allowing us to lead into Justice League... something radical and new for this world, embodying what Superman's debut acted as a catalyst for, rather than what a weary veteran set in his ways would introduce... this is unlikely to be a Batman lead Justice League.
Yet Batman's name is first and they're taking a lot of cues from "The Dark Knight Returns", a story in which Batman "beats" Superman.
Again I say, Superman is playing second fiddle in his sequel, actually, let's change that: Superman is playing second fiddle in the follow up to Man of Steel even though the movie seems to center around him.
Again I say, Superman is playing second fiddle in his sequel, actually, let's change that: Superman is playing second fiddle in the follow up to Man of Steel even though the movie seems to center around him.
The only cues they're taking are a big suit, Bruce's regular suit, and maybe a Robin being dead and Carrie Kelley (again, maybe). That's it, some aesthetic cues, a partner name, and Batman's name being first. That's all it's taking to convince you against all evidence otherwise, that's it's totally a Batman movie and Superman's done.
But this isn't a sequel to MOS though. MOS is getting it's own sequel later on down the line.
Besides the name, why isn't this a sequel?
It's like how Cap 2 is a sequel to first avenger, but avengers follows up with what happens in cap 1.
I was really pissed at this movie too for a long time, until those rumour dates started popping up showing MoS 2 coming later; I'm fine with this movie giving bats top billing as long as it isn't actually MoS 2.
Batman takes up less room on the chyron.
No lie, that's probably all there is to it. The guys in the newsroom aren't editorializing on the nature of the film. They're just trying to get a relatively clutter-free graphics package up on the screen.
Media refer it to the Batman movie because Batman is more popular/well liked than Superman. Coming off Nolan's trilogy being extremely well received, and the past 20 years having atleast 3 times as many Batman films than Superman and Batman comics being the number one selling comics for like the longest time. It will take a lot to surpass Batman being the most popular hero (atleast in America). Hell there's people dressing up like him worldwide. Wolverine, Spiderman and maybe Iron Man are about the only three that come close in likeability. I'd argue that Superman is more recognizable world wide though, both as a symbol of american culture and comic books.
I wouldn't read too much into the media calling it a Batman film.