Dreamgazer
Member
Don't use LMGs with support.
Like we don't use sniper rifles with recons.
problem solved
Like we don't use sniper rifles with recons.
problem solved
Don't use LMGs with support.
Like we don't use sniper rifles with recons.
problem solved
Take your own advice for a change since you're the one spamming these threads with stats BS and bitching all the time.
I never even brought up worries about my accuracy stats or anything of that sort.
Funny how mine's higher than yours now that I look at it, yet you're telling me how to play since I'm a dumb noob.
Oh but no, I should play in a different kinda way, preferably someway that makes you look better and gets me to sit on my ass in the back of the map, in case someone slips by you. Same old shit like it's aways been, just like in BC2.
That's why I hate playing with someone like you.
Instead of wanting to play as a team and just have fun, you want to prove you're better than anyone you play with and if they happen to play a certain way that isn't to your liking, you go on another stupid rant of "waaaaah waaaah waaaaah, what are you doing!". Sheesh.
I have no problem adapting my playstyle or taking advice from other people on this board who are on a whole other level then you. Mind-boggling, I know.
Yet, you don't see them post all that much anymore. Wonder why that is... >_>
Don't use LMGs with support.
Like we don't use sniper rifles with recons.
problem solved
Are you suggesting we self-police ourselves to balance the game for DICE? It's not the same at all. You don't use sniper rifles with recon because leveling recon with them would take forever and most people don't like to sit around and snipe. There are only a small portion of people that can be effective at closer ranges with sniper rifles so most people end up switching and using the PDWs. I don't think any of the PDWs compares to the likes of the 249, 240b or m60 at all.. not even close.
winning is fun.
whoa there!
those starter rifles are pretty cool once you take off that 8x scope!
I never even brought up worries about my accuracy stats or anything of that sort.
Funny how mine's higher than yours now that I look at it, yet you're telling me how to play since I'm a dumb noob.
Instead of wanting to play as a team and just have fun, you want to prove you're better than anyone you play with and if they happen to play a certain way that isn't to your liking, you go on another stupid rant of "waaaaah waaaah waaaaah, what are you doing!". Sheesh.
Oh but no, I should play in a different kinda way, preferably someway that makes you look better and gets me to sit on my ass in the back of the map, in case someone slips by you.
I'm really really sick of all the engineer-lovers who think they're all that. Simply because the game is so fucking unbalanced to the class. I mean people making posts like "I cannot force myself to play <insert class>". If we were to hear that in the BC2 era, the person would get a lecture storm. Have you noticed all the people that were "average" in bc2 all praising themselves to glory now? Yep, they play engineer 24/7.
While we take spm dives in trying to play all classes for the team. Also, what is this bs about "omg too much accuracy". Don't people know that 24/7 engineers' accuracy is fucking skewed cause rpgs (which any moron can accurately hit things with) have a much higher accuracy %?
Then there's that BS where all the engineer whores love playing conquest. Cause then they can at least blame their failure on other people:
Also said:P.S. People like us, who stay at the m-com to defend, who stay at B when everyone is off capping the third flag. They're not appreciated and often times now are looked down upon.
Crossing rush is fine when you (Seks) are on the team. Just watch when it's just you though. The team will let a whole bunch of shit through.
I couldn't agree more. Conquest is 90% base rape, and only requires minimal skill to win, if that. Base raping isn't fun, Rush is. Conquest is stat padding. No doubt about it.
You always do what's best for the squad and team, so I completely understand how it's incredibly frustrating to see the fruits of your labor rot.
Because you play an easy mode class. Funny how I have a decent accuracy stat playing all classes, while you worry about your accuracy while playing solely one class.
In short: You suck. Again: Shut the fuck up, because I play all the damn classes. I get a 15-20% rough accuracy stat with ALL the goddamn class weapons, ergo: My 15.8% with all classes is better than your 20% stupid goddamn engineer only stat.
Shows just how much you know....And yet, you never quit in BC2 or BF3. So you sure do like winning those Conquest Winner pins by base rape, now don't you?
non-random picture to raise tension.
non-random picture to raise tension.
Olimpia knows how to play Conquest but he gets into "derp three flag capture bleeds them easier! LOLOLOL" mindset and attempts to go cap A/C when we only need two flags and have a better chance of winning by having them come to us. You can't rely on Bruiser and Mike because they WILL NEVER HELP. I've had rounds with them where I'm solely the only one attempting to retake our home flag. Why? Because if the enemy team takes that flag and then wipes ya'll off the map, we're stuck in our base. Kinda like what happens when Olimpia plays and has all the flags.
Because you play an easy mode class. Funny how I have a decent accuracy stat playing all classes, while you worry about your accuracy while playing solely one class.
In short: You suck. Again: Shut the fuck up, because I play all the damn classes. I get a 15-20% rough accuracy stat with ALL the goddamn class weapons, ergo: My 15.8% with all classes is better than your 20% stupid goddamn engineer only stat.
Come on, you're a BF veteran and should know better by now. If you put 12 players on one side with my mindset and 12 in the opposite side with your mindset, my 'team' will absolutely crush yours in less than 10 minutes and base raping will follow soon. The game is pretty clear when giving the Conquest mode description: "Capture and Control of the flags". Why the heck would you let the other team hold one flag?
If there's anything I learn from the hundreds of hours played in BC2 is that an aggressive mindset will have you win most of the time. It may not be the best strategy if you're obsessed with your KDR but I don't really give a damn, at the end of the day all I want is winning, and if I can win by leading my team to showcase absolute superiority by crushing the opposition and winning by +200 tickets I'll do whatever it takes.
I love playing conquest with you dude... I feel like you could probably handle it on your own most of the time anyway, but when we tank up or whatever I feel sorry for the other team sometimes. haha
non-random picture to raise tension.
When you heli up, I feel sorry for the other team. Goddamn, I dunno how you manage zip by at low altitude and escape locks like that. All I can do is circle strafe.
Jesus Christ, I only saw his edited post just now.
Talk about pathetic. :-/
Guess I'm done here.
Hmm... actually, I have a question for you since you've been the gunner a few times w/ my low-alt antics: do you find it distracting? Like, is it difficult for you to be effective when I fly like that? Seems like the gunner gets kills, but I wonder if it's frustrating or too disorienting. I try to take all that into consideration when piloting anything, but I honestly don't know in this case, since I've never gunned for someone who pilots like me. I was thinking it might be better to have cockpit view enabled as the gunner and then just drop into the optics when targets are sighted, but I don't know... haven't tried it.
End of the day, I just want to have the most effective vehicle crew possible.
Come on, you're a BF veteran and should know better by now. If you put 12 players on one side with my mindset and 12 in the opposite side with your mindset, my 'team' will absolutely crush yours in less than 10 minutes and base raping will follow soon. The game is pretty clear when giving the Conquest mode description: "Capture and Control of the flags". Why the heck would you let the other team hold one flag?
If there's anything I learn from the hundreds of hours played in BC2 is that an aggressive mindset will have you win most of the time. It may not be the best strategy if you're obsessed with your KDR but I don't really give a damn, at the end of the day all I want is winning, and if I can win by leading my team to showcase absolute superiority by crushing the opposition and winning by +200 tickets I'll do whatever it takes.
I'll agree with that. But I still don't think capping all flags is a bad idea in terms of winning a match. It does make the match less fun IMO though.The Faceless Master said:ACTUALLY
i'd bet most games end in the majority flag hoarders bleeding out the all flag cappers
I still mess up sometimes... but that's less and less. Starting to feel pretty comfortable in most of the choppers. Honestly I feel most comfortable closer to the ground.
I'm about to unlock low altitude. Shits about to get real.
Hmm... actually, I have a question for you since you've been the gunner a few times w/ my low-alt antics: do you find it distracting? Like, is it difficult for you to be effective when I fly like that? Seems like the gunner gets kills, but I wonder if it's frustrating or too disorienting. I try to take all that into consideration when piloting anything, but I honestly don't know in this case, since I've never gunned for someone who pilots like me. I was thinking it might be better to have cockpit view enabled as the gunner and then just drop into the optics when targets are sighted, but I don't know... haven't tried it.
End of the day, I just want to have the most effective vehicle crew possible.
Hope you don't mean done with gaf...
Come on, you're a BF veteran and should know better by now. If you put 12 players on one side with my mindset and 12 in the opposite side with your mindset, my 'team' will absolutely crush yours in less than 10 minutes and base raping will follow soon. The game is pretty clear when giving the Conquest mode description: "Capture and Control of the flags". Why the heck would you let the other team hold one flag?
If there's anything I learn from the hundreds of hours played in BC2 is that an aggressive mindset will have you win most of the time. It may not be the best strategy if you're obsessed with your KDR but I don't really give a damn, at the end of the day all I want is winning, and if I can win by leading my team to showcase absolute superiority by crushing the opposition and winning by +200 tickets I'll do whatever it takes.
Olimpia, Bruiser, Mike: Those three do not have a "defend this" mindset at times. Olimpia knows how to play Conquest but he gets into "derp three flag capture bleeds them easier! LOLOLOL" mindset and attempts to go cap A/C when we only need two flags and have a better chance of winning by having them come to us. You can't rely on Bruiser and Mike because they WILL NEVER HELP. I've had rounds with them where I'm solely the only one attempting to retake our home flag. Why? Because if the enemy team takes that flag and then wipes ya'll off the map, we're stuck in our base. Kinda like what happens when Olimpia plays and has all the flags.
TheSeks said:GEE I WONDER WHO SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE ARE. Meppi, for one... A few others that I could name as well...Then there's that BS where all the engineer whores love playing conquest. Cause then they can at least blame their failure on other people
i've always said cap the majority then carefully get all. many people will cap the majority then immediately move on for all and the enemy slips thru and back caps and starts out that endless circle capping scenario...I'll agree with that. But I still don't think capping all flags is a bad idea in terms of winning a match. It does make the match less fun IMO though.
it's worse because there are potentially less people holding each base.Agreed. Although I wouldn't say it was more fun to control all bases, I don't see how controlling 3 points is worse than controlling 2 as Seks points it out to be.
call me dense, but I dunno how you guys are able to save the pie chart individually to be able to host the image and show it here. So instead here is my stats page:
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/Computers putin/stats/172477502/xbox/
looks like my spread is: 20% Recon, 25% assault, 25% assault%, and 30% engineer.
one more note: each of my top 4 weapons belongs to a different class too
Hope you don't mean done with gaf...
Low-alt is a permanent upgrade, right? So, always on?
To be honest, I can't really say.
Certainly with this thread, unless I have something actually worthwhile to contribute.
Overall it's been pretty terrible for a while now and I don't see things improving.
I mean, why return over and over to a place that annoys you with it stupidity on a regular basis...
Gonna keep lurking for the 360 Cave shooter threads and other arcade game threads, as well as retro threads which pop up once in a while, but other than that, I don't really know.
Will keep playing with you guys as long as you'd like me to, so don't worry about that part.
Oh and great games tonight rock, Dave and Hunting Beast.
We didn't really stand a chance against that clan with the teams being unbalanced and all, but it was still a lot of fun.
from what i read, it's bugged and you can't turn it on.
Hey as long as you still squad up with us... this thread is just whatever.
is there a problem with the mobile aa stats? I've spent one game in the c-ram and one in the pantsir and neither time were any points recoded despite getting vehicle disables each time
This game has so many terrible maps... they had all these years to dev BF3 and this is the best they could do?
This game has so many terrible maps... they had all these years to dev BF3 and this is the best they could do?
JM, stop with the fucking mortar in defense. THREE GODDAMN TIMES I had to DEFEND BY MYSELF because Joe Q. Assfuck doesn't know how to fucking defend. Meanwhile, where are you? Your nose stuck in a mortar book. :| >:| I'm not going to attempt to defend against GAF if you aren't going to help me when the teams are auto-balanced. I'm just... not...
I hate the out-of-body kit items because they give me one less person to PEW PEW defend with.
Wow, never actually seen an argument over who's the best at a game before.
Any UK PS3 Gaffers normally play between 4pm and 7pm? Friends have moved on to other games
Wow, never actually seen an argument over who's the best at a game before.
Any UK PS3 Gaffers normally play between 4pm and 7pm? Friends have moved on to other games
I was stinking it up last night in the attack choppers....
Damn locks from everywhere. How can you take evasive if you have no freaking clue what's painting you? I think my minimap should show the lock. Maybe not infantry though... just vehicles.
I don't know... the vehicles are pretty OP sometimes, but then other times it's like you can't even get into them without someone painting you.
Just a few more points for below radar in the AC's... then we'll see how it plays.
I really despise unlocks. The entire premise of it bothers me, and the implementation here is so obnoxious.
This is the trick for copters... You are useless without a gunner, you and your gunner must both have flairs (stealth also helps), you must communicate to the other person that you will alternate (volley) flairs, when you get locked on wait until the second more frequent beeping tone (this means the attacker has fired his shot and needs to reload. If you do it too soon the time until the next lock will be short because he did not have to reload), then once you pop flairs it is your partners turn, by the time he is done yours will be recharged, and now just rinse and repeat. It also helps to alternate elevations. Also I NEVER point my back to the enemy air spawn... this is akin to asking to be shot down. Hope that helps.