MSG-90A1 please, I need more DMRs to fool around with
Yes please.
MSG-90A1 please, I need more DMRs to fool around with
DAT HIGH PING DOE
Still got it
Yep, MVP. Despite being nearly 300ms pingtime. Yeahhhhhhh..Engineer is still an easy modo class
(Bonus: My Retail BC2 and Origin bought DLC carries over to the Steam Deluxe version I bought. So I got a second set of Steam CD-keys for BC2. Heh.)
Bad Company 2 still fun all these years later, despite balance issues that I bitched endlessly about. Shame half that teamhas left DICE-DICE now.(besides Goldfarb, could leave him out given what he did with Payday 2. *no hate, just saying*)
DAT HIGH PING DOE
Still got it
Yep, MVP. Despite being nearly 300ms pingtime. Yeahhhhhhh..Engineer is still an easy modo class
What was your ping though? The full server on Vietnam I had was a ping of 96 that was filled with a bunch of 200+ pings which put me in the 300ping range.
If the pings were resonable/non-European or Asian I'd probably play BC2 a bit more.
Pretty decent, around 100. I checked a few times and it was usually less than that. Most of the players in the server seemed to have decent ping as well, but I haven't kept checking on them much.
Game has around 2k people playing right now, more than Titanfall on PC. >.>
I haven't played much since the launch of China Rising and easing my way back in - first off I hate the sheer amount of things that are unlocked via assignments along with the ridiculously long attachment grinding on top of that... anyway, what did I miss, what are the best/worst weapons/vehicles/setups etc. now
Mind = boggledAll of them. None of them. It really depends on how you wnat to play. I don't use ANY of the weapon attachments with certain exceptions (like the SKS with an ACOG scope, most other guns with iron sights) so it's not like you need any of them. It depends on how you feel. Same with vehicle set-ups.
Mind = boggled
Why would you do this? Is it just for kicks and laughs or out of boredom? There are some attachments that have no negative side effects, they literally just make the gun better. Some attachments are more subjective like sights, but are still objectively better in that they increase viewable area and have a smaller point of aiming for accuracy. But naked, I just don't understand that.
In other news: Gunmaster is now live in CTE if you have a capable PC of playing BF4 on console players.,
Need to try the new guns. I still don't really care for "Gun Game" in BF and the maps right now are TOTALLY NOT BUILT for the mode, but I do like that they allow you to make the mode "pistol only" instead of primaries. Should be interesting for pistol farming?
Edit: That AN-94 being like BC2's in two-shot burst mode. *boner*
Soooo good. How I've missed you since you were shit in BF3.
That looks like one of the best iron sights in the game easily. Very COD type iron sight. Based on limited experience last night, an-94 is a headshot machine. But the RPM/Burst makes it really bad in CQB.
People are complaining about the Rate of Fire, but honestly: I feel the gun is perfect as it is. If they buff the RoF... woof.
Also, never ever ever ever ever use full auto on an AN-94.
It's the only way to use it in BF3 since the two-shot burst jams despite getting into the "rhythm" of the TAKKA-TAKKA-TAKKA. In BF3 it'd be more like "TAKKA-TAK*CHICKCHIKCHICK*"
At least in full-auto it'd be more like "TAKKATAKKATAK-TAKKATAKKATA-TAKKATAKKATAKKA."
That's not to mention the second-shot in two-shot burst would jump higher than the first shot which goes against the main selling feature of the gun.
Full-auto on the AN-94 is garbage.
The gun rarely, if ever, jammed for me.
The second shot does not jump higher, that's completely false.
Burst fire mode worked fine in CQC
The gun had a totally OP burst mode in BF3, much more powerful than in BC2 as far as I'm aware.
The second shot does not go higher. Are you saying the second bullet has recoil applied to it?
Has anyone maxed out the battlepacks for all the weapons? I've finshed everything but the dmrs which I hate.
Regarding the second bullet: Look man, the game couldn't even register the recoil for the second bullet of any gun in the game that had over 900 RPM for burst and auto. What you're saying is completely false.
First shot, second shot, third shot, fourth shot. All going up.
Caspian Border and Operation Mortar are the two best maps in the game. I wish there were servers that only ran them. There is one that I frequent that runs only Caspian and Firestorm, but Firestorm is boring.
Sounds like the Xbone is getting CTE soon, but isn't a bit too late now?
Source/Link?
I don't think it's too late for it. Especially considering they plan to keep this thing for future BF and other games as well. Plus having it on consoles means better feedback etc on consoles as well.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield_4_CTE/comments/30u0c1/cte_april/cpvsk2l
And towards the end of this BattleNonsense video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B40u12etY_U
He mentions Microsoft allowed EA/DICE to add the network graph while Sony refused.
Premium edition is currently $25. I own it on PS4 and have played alot of it, but I'm thinking about grabbing the PC version, while Hardline remains my current console shooter of choice.
Is the PC community alive and well?
A is the only way.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield_4_CTE/comments/30u0c1/cte_april/cpvsk2l
And towards the end of this BattleNonsense video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B40u12etY_U
He mentions Microsoft allowed EA/DICE to add the network graph while Sony refused.
I have a feeling C layout is gonna lose by a landslide. Way too boring and safe. Plus we already have Hainan Resort with the exact same layout.
Whether or not the balance in the layouts shouldn't matter, because this is simply choosing what kind of flag placement you want to see in the new map. If there ends up being a big advantage for one team due to the map layout, we would figure that out very quickly and the devs would adjust it accordingly via terrain changes and so on.
Voted B, since that actually looks interesting and strays away from the usual "give each team a couple of free flags and focus the action in the middle" layout we keep seeing in most maps.
I have a feeling C layout is gonna lose by a landslide. Way too boring and safe. Plus we already have Hainan Resort with the exact same layout.
Whether or not the balance in the layouts shouldn't matter, because this is simply choosing what kind of flag placement you want to see in the new map. If there ends up being a big advantage for one team due to the map layout, we would figure that out very quickly and the devs would adjust it accordingly via terrain changes and so on.
I'd love to see the metrics on that map, would love to know if one side wins in an overwhelming fashion, like Noshahr Canals.Hainan Resort Clone 2.
You say this like they added one flag to Rogue Transmission despite it being clear one side has flag advantage for... oh... two years now?
Sorry, but I don't have confidence in their map reiterating process until they SHOW me they actually listen. Hence, C.
Also if Consoles have gotten the netgraph: Turn that on and don't look back. Only issue is it overlaying on the ammo counter (unless you're able to move it like PC can?), explains some really fucking weird issues with regards to ping reporting and lag/etc.
Does anyone here have the complete Battlefield 4 install on PC, the game and all DLC maps installed?
About to buy the season pass and just wondering how much total space it would take.