Maninthemirror
Banned
ctrl-f Big Trouble in Little China
0 findings
shitty list
That was a shockingly bad movie
ctrl-f Big Trouble in Little China
0 findings
shitty list
Welp, we got into the "affront to film buff" part of the conversation, so here we go with my record skip.
I really do not like 2001: A Space Odyssey
That was a shockingly bad movie
I certainly hope you weren't one of the voters.Citizen Kane is a godawful movie (this coming from someone who enjoyed Movie43 and The Man With Iron Fists).
fuck Godard up the ass.
It's technically a marvelous film that looks great even up against contemporary films.
The plot was a convoluted mess that presented a ham-fisted philosophical statement on the nature of science and man.
Arthur C Clarke's novel was easier to follow
How about a little respect.
Way too many old movies on there. Old movies get way more praise than they deserve. Nostalgia is fucking powerful shit.
Then when a modern movie is on there its Dark Knight? Christ.
Citizen Kane is a godawful movie (this coming from someone who enjoyed Movie43 and The Man With Iron Fists).
This is false. I prefer 2, but if anything there's a slight leaning towards 1, "widely".
The movie wasn't hard to follow by any means.
You just called it a convoluted mess...
the problem with asking critics what are the best films possible is that they always chose older films that are viewed as "classic" or "immpecable" because they shape the taste and expectations of the critic in the first place. these movies are rated higher and viewed as greater than if they had released today where there is an immediate sneer towards most big blockbuster movies by certain critics and a rejection of more "profound" or art-like movies by others. Star Wars is on there but you wouldn't ever see Fury Road on one of these lists. Jaws rates but `71 doesn't. The Dark Knight barely rates at all, at 96.
I would make more comparisons but many of them do come down to personal preference, but the overall point still stands.
Citizen Kane is a godawful movie (this coming from someone who enjoyed Movie43 and The Man With Iron Fists).
It's always nice when someone takes the time to discredit their opinion in the same post.
I feel like some of those movies are just on there because people don't want to leave them out for fear of disrespecting the history of film making when in reality, some of those films don't hold up at all.
Nostalgia is a powerful drug.
Are you Armond White?Citizen Kane is a godawful movie (this coming from someone who enjoyed Movie43 and The Man With Iron Fists).
It's technically a marvelous film that looks great even up against contemporary films.
The plot was a convoluted mess that presented a ham-fisted philosophical statement on the nature of science and man.
Citizen Kane is a godawful movie (this coming from someone who enjoyed Movie43 and The Man With Iron Fists).
Z.. pls
This isn't a list of a bunch of rudderless esoteric foreign art films from the '60s. They're mostly big fuckin' Hollywood productions, designed for mass entertainment.
Either you're trolling, or you don't understand what makes a good movie a good movie.
Starting to wonder if Z is actually Costa-Gavras.
I think it's clear from his parenthetical that he means the latter.
I'm definitely surprised that the Coen's didn't make the list at all. I wonder if their sensibilities are just slightly too "off" for the critics in question?
The only post-2000s movie that made the list is from David Lynch, nice.
Haha the ending isn't even obtuse, as you put it. Maybe tough to understand on a first watch, but the film has a pretty clear overarching narrative. Easily one of the best films of all time.
Don't blame the movie for your ignorance. The film even opens with Zarathustra just to make sure you won't miss it. If you can't puzzle the rest yourself, this movie is clearly not for you.
It's technically a marvelous film that looks great even up against contemporary films.
The plot was a convoluted mess that presented a ham-fisted philosophical statement on the nature of science and man.
It's odd because I've always felt that Coen brother's movies are all quintessentially American with a capital A. They drench often cynical farces in a blinding optimism that really defines American attitudes, especially pre 2008.
I'm sure somebody somewhere has made an argument for Citizen Kane being a bad movie. Its just nobody has ever read it before.
Critics are so caught up in the hubris of their film intellect.
Seeing Citizen Kane at #1 is so cliche. I don't care about the innovations it pioneered at the time -- I'm judging as a movie I'm watching. Boring. I feel asleep the second time.
Where is Gone with the Wind?
My problem with it is that it's not bad at all - it's still a very good film.
My problem is that so many others since then have done so much better.
Welp, guess all you can do is make your own list in comparison. I just made up a top 100 American films, with the main purpose is spreading the wealth. My main pet peeve with this list is how 10 directors own 41 spots. That's crazy. I mean fuckin' Marnie and Eyes Wide Shut, FOH. At MOST, I have guys like Scorsese and Allen with 3 each, and even then was pushing it.
I've asked 5 people about what they thought happened at the end, and I got five different answers. That's obtuse
:lol at my "ignorance." The ending is trash and the movie is beyond boring. It looks great. That's it.
Sweet, one handy list of movies I can ignore all in one spot.