Why is there so much disdain for this choice? Affleck is pretty good actor, who would you guys rather over him?
This thread should be archived for future reference. Just like the initial Heath Ledger/Joker thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=110889&highlight=heath+ledger
EDIT: Sorry. Over reaction for a second. He's being getting better I think. He might just be a good Batman. I still remember people saying Heath Ledger would be a terrible Joker.
He can't be any worse than bale.
This film is such a terrible, misguided idea - a stupid knee-jerk reaction to The Avengers.
I enjoyed Affleck's movies but every role he's in is boring. At least Christian Bale was diverse so I couldn't imagine what exactly he was gonna bring to the table.
Maybe I'm mad because I wanted Jon Hamm to be given a chance.
Good to me. Now get him to direct it.
YOU HAVE TO BE FUCKING ME
WHAT THE FUCK
It's more of a terrible allocation of resources by WB.This film is such a terrible, misguided idea - a stupid knee-jerk reaction to The Avengers.
Seriously. This is going to be weird.When is the last movie though where the lead actor was a better director than the actual director?
Bookmarking this thread for extra servings of crow when it comes out.
You mean as far as getting the right body to pull off Batman? I have no idea if Jon Hamm can pull that off, but I'd prefer him as an older, not so physical Batman.
This article about Ben Affleck dispelling rumors of him playing Batman in Batman Begins is hilariously ironic now.
DWAYNE JOHNSON WAS ROBBED