steve said:I'll go out on a limb and say in 2 years HD content is outselling SD content.
Not a chance.
steve said:I'll go out on a limb and say in 2 years HD content is outselling SD content.
Tobor said:You're right, but compete how? DD isn't going away.
neptunes said:do you forsee some massive reduction in HDTVs prices in the next 2 years as well?
sony just dropped production on rear-projection tvs
HD DVD is actually administrated by the same DVD Forum that holds DVD which includes all of the BD companies, and indeed they all have the right to vote on matters pertaining to HD DVD. Disney are the only ones who exercise that right, except apparently when it's something that could negatively affect Blu-ray - when they voted on whether HD DVD should be interoperable with that official Chinese standard Sony and co were the only ones to vote no, for example.RavenFox said:What? Do you know how many companies are in the BluRay camp? Compared to just two for HD-DVD?
and 5 times the amount of people are buying regular crt edTVs with $70 DVD players and/or recorders.steve said:This is already happening. Next time you walk into your local electronics chain, Best Buy or the sort, take a look at the television areas and make a note of what you see.
It's not the tech geeks buying new TVs these days, it's the baby boomers in their 50's with money to burn that are investing in the new tech. Once they adopt, you've got mass acceptance.
They show it off to their friends, and on and on it goes.
MWS Natural said:CES 2008 MS announces that all digital downloads for the Xbox 360 will become DRM free and they will release 320GB as well as a 500GB HD in the next coming months. Blu-ray/HD-DVD nullified.
Yeah, nothing like waiting all night for a full-length HD movie to download. Or not being able to store very many of them at all.MWS Natural said:CES 2008 MS announces that all digital downloads for the Xbox 360 will become DRM free and they will release 320GB as well as a 500GB HD in the next coming months. Blu-ray/HD-DVD nullified.
Info is always good. Thx.NekoFever said:HD DVD is actually administrated by the same DVD Forum that holds DVD which includes all of the BD companies, and indeed they all have the right to vote on matters pertaining to HD DVD. Disney are the only ones who exercise that right, except apparently when it's something that could negatively affect Blu-ray - when they voted on whether HD DVD should be interoperable with that official Chinese standard Sony and co were the only ones to vote no, for example.
Uhmm no they are not. There is so much wrong with that post I suggest you do what he says and go to Best Buy.neptunes said:and 5 times the amount of people are buying regular crt edTVs
neptunes said:and 5 times the amount of people are buying regular crt edTVs
BruceLeeRoy said:The best part about this whole deal is I cant wait to see what Harry Knowles writes in response after his ridiculous WHY I CHOSE HDDVD THE WINNING FORMAT.
kaching said:So you're saying that HD media will catch on twice as fast as DVD media did? It took DVD approximately 6 years to finally outpace VHS sales...
BruceWayneIII said:Soul Creator: it's not really the same. A movie is filmed on a specific media and then gets transferred to a multiple of mediums. They don't have to have DVD or Blu-ray in mind when making the movie. Same can not be said about creating software (games): CPU is specific, GPU is specific, bus might be specific, RAM etc. etc.
Chiggs said:Hey, they're not paying me! But if I were to guess: standalone prices need to drop asap, and software prices need to follow suit.
As far as DD...of course it's not going away, but the studios can certainly make it so that HDM debuts on BRD first. As a movie collector, I want the hard copy. And I know I'm not alone on that.
Personally, I see both DD and BRD living in harmony.
badcrumble said:Yeah, nothing like waiting all night for a full-length HD movie to download. Or not being able to store very many of them at all.
Storage and broadband simply aren't enough right now for direct download to be sufficient for HD movies. The world is moving toward Blu-Ray for HD movies and direct download for SD movies (where iTunes will eclipse everything else, pretty much).
MWS Natural said:CES 2008 MS announces that all digital downloads for the Xbox 360 will become DRM free and they will release 320GB as well as a 500GB HD in the next coming months. Blu-ray/HD-DVD nullified.
Dont blame the HD format for anything. This is progress and the FCC move to pure digital airwaves sweetens the future ahead.urk said:And this transition has been made far more difficult due to a number of factors. All the jump from VHS to DVD required was a new player. DVD to HD requires a brand new television and the unraveling of tangled standards and formats. It's too much for a lot of consumers to deal with and in the end, they see a disc that looks exactly the same in the case and technology that makes improvements that they don't see as clearly as the VHS to DVD jump.
Sony is still left with the same problem: they aren't appealing to the casual market. High Definition is not casual yet. Not even close.
Zophar said:Digital distribution is a long ways off, for a variety of reasons but particularly because of this: people like having stuff. Our generation has adopted digital media fairly well but I still amass tons of CDs and DVDs because deep down inside everyone likes having a giant bookshelf of awesome books/discs/precious moments dolls. I see it becoming fashionable for rental services but when Netflix is already as huge as it is, why go out and buy a $600 box so you don't have to keep movies floating around when Netflix will have them out of your hair in less than a week?
Streaming HD quality doesn't even compare to an actual HD transfer. The bandwidth simply doesn't exist to even transmit 720p at a reasonably high bitrate. What you're getting is the MP3 equivalent of high definition video.Tobor said:Downloads don't have to be 1080P. 720P is more than sufficient for a rental.
I can't stand it when people keep talking about how HD downloads are so in the future.
I watched Reno 911:Miami in 720P last night on Comcast. It's not in the future.
TheDuce22 said:I doubt this will have any impact on PS3 as a game console.
RavenFox said:Dont blame the HD format for anything. This is progress and the FCC move to pure digital airwaves sweetens the future ahead.
Comcast is the supplier of your bandwidth. And that was streaming over that bandwidth. Unless Microsoft becomes an ISP/cable-level content provider, it won't exactly be easy for them to make that sort of thing happen. We're talking about totally different levels of available bandwidth and technology here.Tobor said:Downloads don't have to be 1080P. 720P is more than sufficient for a rental.
I can't stand it when people keep talking about how HD downloads are so in the future.
I watched Reno 911:Miami in 720P last night on Comcast. It's not in the future.
HD-DVD has Weinstein Company too, but they'll flinch next. Those guys freak out at the first sign of failure (remember the Grindhouse fiasco?).FF_VIII said:So basically;
HD-DVD
Paramount
Dreamworks
Universal
BRD
New Line Cinema
Everything else
Yeah keep holding on to that one.TheDuce22 said:I doubt this will have any impact on PS3 as a game console.
Dozens of what standards? If you walk into an electronics store like bestbuy the BluRay section and now defunct HD-DVD section was clearly labeled. If consumers are confused on what it is I suggest they do what they did when they were in school. Ask a question. Society cant be that dumb eh? Or do you drive or take the train to work on your own personal route?urk said:Who's blaming? I'm watching HD content right now. But I realize I'm in the minority. And I also realize that the HD formats have not made the transition easy for consumers. There's literally dozens of standards, replete with horrible acronyms and hamstringing caveats that makes it really difficult for most people to walk into a B&M and buy anything HD.
Where's the benefit to most consumers? More lines of resolution? It's just not worth it for most.
Actually I know one guy that this will give the final push to buy a PS3.omg rite said:And this really won't do anything for PS3.
At all.
No one is going to say, "Oh shit, Warner movies are on Blu-ray now!? Gotta get me a PS3!"
So.. wrong forum.
Zophar said:Streaming HD quality doesn't even compare to an actual HD transfer. The bandwidth simply doesn't exist to even transmit 720p at a reasonably high bitrate. What you're getting is the MP3 equivalent of high definition video.
badcrumble said:Comcast is the supplier of your bandwidth. And that was streaming over that bandwidth. Unless Microsoft becomes an ISP/cable-level content provider, it won't exactly be easy for them to make that sort of thing happen. We're talking about totally different levels of available bandwidth and technology here.
RavenFox said:Yeah keep holding on to that one.
painful fart said:Actually I know one guy that this will give the final push to buy a PS3.
Anyhow, breaking these news 2 days before CES must create a shit storm of category 5 in the HD-DVD camp. No doubt Sony must have put some seriuos work into swinging Warner their way.
If anything in Bill Gates presentation concerned HD-DVD, it will probably be toned down or removed altogether. The 360 Ultimate will remain just a twink in Bills eye, despite whatever was MS original intention.
It isnt worth a single penny to me. Its similar in all aspects to DVD quality except maybe a bit sharper. Maybe if companioes hand out free TVs or players people might upgrade eventually but I dont see it happeningf until people can get HD quality stuff for the price or less than SD. People arent going to buy a new TV + new player+ HD discs at substantially higher prices for a miminmal benefit. If it was revolutionary, I could see it happening, but the vast majority of people can barely afford DVD, let alone hd. Try taking SD channels off the air or stop selling DVD players and watch the revolts happen. I have no idea how theyre gonna force this on people but its not going to be a pretty sight.urk said:Who's blaming? I'm watching HD content right now. But I realize I'm in the minority. And I also realize that the HD formats have not made the transition easy for consumers. There's literally dozens of standards, replete with horrible acronyms and hamstringing caveats that makes it really difficult for most people to walk into a B&M and buy anything HD.
Where's the benefit to most consumers? More lines of resolution? It's just not worth it for most.
Your reply is nonsensical. Nothing to do with Gaf. Do you really fucking think PS3 sales wont boost when its carrying the only format the studios are using? It doesn't even have to be PS3 since the Sony hate is so strong. Lets call it Bens Player if you like.TheDuce22 said:Woops, I forgot this was GAF. THE TIDE HAS TURNED, IT BEGINS, GO PS3!!!
Innotech said:It isnt worth a single penny to me. Its similar in all aspects to DVD quality except maybe a bit sharper. Maybe if companioes hand out free TVs or players people might upgrade eventually but I dont see it happeningf until people can get HD quality stuff for the price or less than SD. People arent going to buy a new TV + new player+ HD discs at substantially higher prices for a miminmal benefit. If it was revolutionary, I could see it happening, but the vast majority of people can barely afford DVD, let alone hd. Try taking SD channels off the air or stop selling DVD players and watch the revolts happen. I have no idea how theyre gonna force this on people but its not going to be a pretty sight.
norinrad21 said:I'm still hoarding a huge amount of DVDs and i haven't stopped buying them yet. Am i screwed by any chance with the format wars? :lol
RavenFox said:Yeah keep holding on to that one.QUOTE]
explain
I don't think they've been planning to appeal to the casual market for at least another couple of years.urk said:Sony is still left with the same problem: they aren't appealing to the casual market. High Definition is not casual yet. Not even close.
Tobor said:Which is perfectly fine for the majority of customers.
I don't want to get into this again. I'm happy for you all that Bluray won. I will get a player and maybe buy a disc or two. Happy?
I rent movies on my 360. Using the comcast bandwidth. Right now. Do you even know what you're talking about? Never mind. Just let me out of here before I get carried away.
abacab driver said:Absolutely not, which is why I (in the same boat as you) find this whole thing funny.
DVD has been beautiful to me these last couple years (as a collector)..so much good stuff making it on DVD now and there will continue to be.
HD movies arent even on my radar until a great catalog is there and the price is there. DVD took well over 5 years to get that way.
Even then, theres no point in buying movies (that you probably already own) from the 70s/80s/90s for a more expensive format that doesn't even benefit them (like Bladerunner..why?).
I'm perfectly content with watching my extremely robust DVD collection on my HDTV (and my snazzy speaker setup)..and gaming in HD. I'll care about HD movies when there are enough movies filmed in HD worth buying.
RavenFox said:Do you really fucking think PS3 sales wont boost when its carrying the only format the studios are using?
scoobs said:Downloads can't work until cable/dsl speeds are sped up ALOT.
GhettoGamer said:I did /\RavenFox said:Yeah keep holding on to that one.QUOTE]
explain
When did you hook back up your VCR? DVD is going to the wind. Did I write that? Or your just trying to twist this someplace else? HD is here and its damn successful and guess what? It will move up the ladder and take DVD's place one day. Also the same people that press our beloved dvd's are pushing the HD format. Send them your letter and concerns.GauntletFan said:Wait, when did they all stop using regular DVD?