• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Boxing Discussion

see5harp

Member
thirty said:
btw, anyone else appreciate manny, in those mid rounds, calling cotto in, covering up, and allow cotto to punch himself out?

Those were truly my favorite parts of the fight, although Pacquiao does this in every fight. This was no ordinary fight, though, and Pac was taking some decent hooks to the head and body in these exchanges on the ropes. The way Pac would let him throw his 5 punch flurry, then quickly roll off and shoot a 2-3-4-5 punch flurry is awesome though. That was the ultimate turning point for me....when he was able to take Cotto's best shots against the ropes, then come back and floor him with (basically) one big uppercut. I said it earlier in this thread....never go against Pacquiao.

He looks stronger now than he did in destroying Morales and Barrera....that is a scary thought.
 
see5harp said:
Those were truly my favorite parts of the fight, although Pacquiao does this in every fight. This was no ordinary fight, though, and Pac was taking some decent hooks to the head and body in these exchanges on the ropes. The way Pac would let him throw his 5 punch flurry, then quickly roll off and shoot a 2-3-4-5 punch flurry is awesome though. That was the ultimate turning point for me....when he was able to take Cotto's best shots against the ropes, then come back and floor him with (basically) one big uppercut. I said it earlier in this thread....never go against Pacquiao.

He looks stronger now than he did in destroying Morales and Barrera....that is a scary thought.


Of course he's stronger. He did go up in weight. I think the scary thing is that he retained his speed which is something Marquez couldn't do in his fight against Mayweather.
 
thirty said:
yahoo sports says the head honcho of hbo sports is gonna have mayweather's people call bob arum on monday to formally begin negotiations. they gotta split 80 million dollars somehow. tough job.

btw, anyone else appreciate manny, in those mid rounds, calling cotto in, covering up, and allow cotto to punch himself out? then come back with damaging flurries of his own that cotto could not take. i think that was when cotto's spirit was broken and he decided to back peddle the rest of the fight. mayweather will be too smart to be baited in that way, but we shall see.

Pacman said the punches did hurt, but he was pretending they didn't so he could break Cotto. He also said the 1st round was all about measuring up Cotto and seeing where he can get in.

Check his post fight interview when he is wearing a hat, it's all there
 
Mecha_Infantry said:
Pacman said the punches did hurt, but he was pretending they didn't so he could break Cotto.

:lol

Of course they fucking hurt. Nevertheless, his legs were solid and he never looked to be in any trouble whatsoever after the first round.

Show me a boxer that doesn't pretend that punches don't hurt.
 

thirty

Banned
liquid_gears said:
:lol

Of course they fucking hurt. Nevertheless, his legs were solid and he never looked to be in any trouble whatsoever after the first round.

Show me a boxer that doesn't pretend that punches don't hurt.
pretending that the punches don't hurt is one thing, putting your back against the ropes and letting your opponent give his best shots "as a strategy" is pure insanity if you ask me. that's some legendary ali shit there. but i can see why pac did it, "give me your best, now it's my turn." cotto obviously couldn't take pac's best and his spirit broke and went into "don't knock me the fuck out" mode.

how the fuck is pac gonna bait mayweather to trade punches with him though is the question?
 
liquid_gears said:
:lol

Of course they fucking hurt. Nevertheless, his legs were solid and he never looked to be in any trouble whatsoever after the first round.

Show me a boxer that doesn't pretend that punches don't hurt.

thirty said:
pretending that the punches don't hurt is one thing, putting your back against the ropes and letting your opponent give his best shots "as a strategy" is pure insanity if you ask me. that's some legendary ali shit there. but i can see why pac did it, "give me your best, now it's my turn." cotto obviously couldn't take pac's best and his spirit broke and went into "don't knock me the fuck out" mode.

You answered his post the best. Of course the punches hurt, but boxing is about hitting and not getting hit. This is some old school rope-a-dope affair here, I have seen boxers TRY and pretend their opponents punches didn't hurt, and had their shit ruined. But Pacquiao DELIBERATELY stayed on the ropes, took ALL the shots, primarily not even to wear him out, but to see if his strength was as the Cotto camp said...
 

h_a_t

Member
thirty said:
yahoo sports says the head honcho of hbo sports is gonna have mayweather's people call bob arum on monday to formally begin negotiations. they gotta split 80 million dollars somehow. tough job.

btw, anyone else appreciate manny, in those mid rounds, calling cotto in, covering up, and allow cotto to punch himself out? then come back with damaging flurries of his own that cotto could not take. i think that was when cotto's spirit was broken and he decided to back peddle the rest of the fight. mayweather will be too smart to be baited in that way, but we shall see.



It's gotta be 50/50 imo.
They're each not going to get that kind of cash doing a couple of fights against other contenders so I have to think who ever won't agree to 50/50 doesn't really want the fight.




theBishop said:
I'd have to watch some of Floyd's older fights, but does he even have the punching power of Cotto? My impression of Floyd is unbelievable defense, and accurate counter-punching. But not especially powerful.

Cotto landed some legitimate bombs in the early rounds, and it's not clear that Pacman was ever shook. If Paquiao's unconventional offense can get through Floyd's technically proficient defense, I can't see Floyd hurting him.


I don't see Floyd knocking Pacman out, but I think one reason Pacquiao was able to take Cotto's shots was he saw most of them coming and braced himself.
Mayweather will have to use his quickness and defense to counter Manny when he's slighty off balance.
Also, Mayweather may have to be a bit more offensive minded just because judges will prefer Manny's style of constant attacks even if Floyd is catching them on his gloves, shoulders, or rolling with the punches.
 
Mayweather is looking at Manny dodging the question the wrong way. Mayweather is looking at the situation as if he is still the best in the game. He could very well still be but at this moment, Manny is the consensus pound-for-pound best so why should he go challenge Mayweather? Mayweather should be the one to challenge Manny.
 
I have the PBF - Pacman fight as 75/25 in favour of a Mayweather victory. Even though PBF sometimes has trouble with southpaws, I still see him countering Manny all night. Marquez beat Manny twice IMO so I'd be extremely surprised if Manny pulled off the victory.

That's not to say that he won't have his moments but I think they'll be few and far between.
 
jerrymaguire said:
is there such a thing as, which outcome would benefit the world of boxing more if Manny does fight PBF?? Anyone like to answer this question?

I think the outcome for boxing as a whole is irrelevant as I believe the victor (and possibly the loser as well) will retire.
 
Zep said:
Talking on sports radio this morning...

Pacquiao/Mayweather - Yankee Stadium

I'd be ALL for it...That would be fucking insane. Screw Vegas.

Not. Going. To. Happen.

MGM will pay whatever it takes to get this fight there. Too much money to be made.
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
ragingadamo said:
Those are some good pics, it looks like you had pretty good seats. If you don't mind me asking what was the ballpark figure of what you paid for em?

They were average seats, my camera just has a good zoom. (Canon FTW).

Seats were $300/piece.

BTW MGM Garden Arena... nice arena... horrible fuckin entrance and exit.... the entire arena routed through through two sets of double doors, through a pretty small walkway back out to the casino considering the size of the Arena... was TERRIBLE trying to get out of that place... first and last time we'll see a fight live there....
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
J Tourettes said:
I have the PBF - Pacman fight as 75/25 in favour of a Mayweather victory. Even though PBF sometimes has trouble with southpaws, I still see him countering Manny all night. Marquez beat Manny twice IMO so I'd be extremely surprised if Manny pulled off the victory.
Marquez hasn't been the same fighter really moving up in weight, so I dunno how much stock you can put into that. Whereas Manny seems to have least retained his speed, footwork, and power moving up, and he has also improved his skill overall since his fights with Marquez.
 

thirty

Banned
manny's response after every fight when asked "who's next?" is to respond with a "i leave that for my promoter to figure out."
 
XiaNaphryz said:
Marquez hasn't been the same fighter really moving up in weight, so I dunno how much stock you can put into that. Whereas Manny seems to have least retained his speed, footwork, and power moving up, and he has also improved his skill overall since his fights with Marquez.

I'm not sure how this is relevant to my post as I wasn't using the analogy that PBF beat Marquez, Marquez beat PAC (in my eyes) so therefore PBF beats Pac, as we all know that that's not how boxing works.

My point was that Marquez is a counter-puncher, as is PBF and look at the success Marquez had with that style against Pac.
 
look at the success Marquez had with that style against Pac.

That's true, but Manny is a vastly improved, more complete boxer since his fights with Marquez imo.

Does anyone really think that if there was a 3rd fight that it play out similar to the previous 2? I certainly couldn't see that happening.

Manny answered a lot of questions for me with such a demolition of Cotto, it really makes a fight with Mayweather a pick-em for me and would come down to intangibles.

It really is best offense vs best defense, and hugely intriguing! :D

He has a point about the positives being purely on Pacquiao's side outside of the money.

Not really if he wants to get back the #1 Pound For Pound ranking. Cos Manny is rightfully number 1 PFP.

In other stuff, another cracking fight this Saturday with Kessler vs Ward. I expect Kessler to win, but Ward is a dark horse - Dirrell did better than I expected against Froch and Ward might surprise me as well.
 

Jackson50

Member
harSon said:
He has a point about the positives being purely on Pacquiao's side outside of the money.
Yeah, the only thing PBF will gain from a victory is money. The public will dog Floyd regardless of a victory.
 
gollumsluvslave said:
That's true, but Manny is a vastly improved, more complete boxer since his fights with Marquez imo.

Does anyone really think that if there was a 3rd fight that it play out similar to the previous 2? I certainly couldn't see that happening.

Manny answered a lot of questions for me with such a demolition of Cotto, it really makes a fight with Mayweather a pick-em for me and would come down to intangibles.

It really is best offense vs best defense, and hugely intriguing! :D



Not really if he wants to get back the #1 Pound For Pound ranking. Cos Manny is rightfully number 1 PFP.

In other stuff, another cracking fight this Saturday with Kessler vs Ward. I expect Kessler to win, but Ward is a dark horse - Dirrell did better than I expected against Froch and Ward might surprise me as well.


Really? Vastly improved since the second Marquez? We've not seen him in with another skilled counter-puncher so it's hard to judge. I'm as impressed as anyone with his showing against Cotto but to say that a fight with PBF and Pac is a pick 'em is a step too far for me. I can see PBF pot-shotting all night, Pac getting frustrated in the later rounds and getting tagged even more.

I'd love to see Pac win to shut Mayweather up so then more people will be openly doubting his legacy but I just can't see it :(

Mayweather will go down as the biggest waste of talent of all time in my eyes with his current CV.
 

harSon

Banned
gollumsluvslave said:
Not really if he wants to get back the #1 Pound For Pound ranking. Cos Manny is rightfully number 1 PFP.

There's nothing he can do to Manny that hasn't already been done to him. He can knock him to the canvas, beat him by decision, or knock him out and it won't really mean anything considering the fact that it has all happened before. On the flip side; Mayweather has never been knocked down, lost a fight, or knocked out. In Pacquiao's case, a win over Mayweather would be historic, while a win for Mayweather will be seen as little more than another solid win.
 
harSon said:
There's nothing he can do to Manny that hasn't already been done to him. He can knock him to the canvas, beat him by decision, or knock him out and it won't really mean anything considering the fact that it has all happened before. On the flip side; Mayweather has never been knocked down, lost a fight, or knocked out. In Pacquiao's case, a win over Mayweather would be historic, while a win for Mayweather will be seen as little more than another solid win.

There's always an excuse for Floyd not to fight someone...
 

harSon

Banned
J Tourettes said:
There's always an excuse for Floyd not to fight someone...

All smart Champions pick and choose their opponents. Why didn't Pacquiao fight Mosley, Margarito, Berto, Paul Williams, etc?

I still don't get why Mayweather receives little credit for defeating Hatton and De La Hoya while Pacquiao simultaniously gets his dick slobbered for doing the same.
 

SUPREME1

Banned
Mayweather will NEVER fight Paul Williams because he KNOWS he'll lose.

Pacquiao has basically taken on all comers within reason.



Pacquiao also demolished DLH and Hatton in a way Mayweather couldn't.... all while being smaller.


I don't think Pacman could beat Mayweather, because Mayweather won't engage... but I think Pacman has bigger balls and more heart than him.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
harSon said:
Why didn't Pacquiao fight Mosley, Margarito, Berto, Paul Williams, etc?
Well, he's only had 2 matches so far in the weight class going back to a year ago, with the Hatton one in-between at a lower weight-class to continue the whole "collect a title at each weight class" thing. So when would he have had any real opportunity to fight all those guys? Plus the first matchup with DLH was understandable as a "test the waters" fight, considering just 6 months before he was fighting 2 weight classes below (and 3 weight classes below if you go back 8-9 months before).

If Manny does stay up at this weight class, he'll have to end up fighting at least some of those guys.
 

harSon

Banned
ImperialConquest said:
Mayweather will NEVER fight Paul Williams because he KNOWS he'll lose.

Pacquiao has basically taken on all comers within reason.



Pacquiao also demolished DLH and Hatton in a way Mayweather couldn't.... all while being smaller.


I don't think Pacman could beat Mayweather, because Mayweather won't engage... but I think Pacman has bigger balls and more heart than him.

You're part of the problem. Pacquiao and Mayweather are two completely different boxers, one is an offensive brawler while the other is a defensive counter-puncher. It's not that Mayweather couldn't beat Hatton and DLH like Pacquiao has, his boxing style simply doesn't allow it. This is the problem with all sports, from a spectators standpoint, Offense is always more electrifying than Defense resulting in skewed rankings.
 

see5harp

Member
Jamesfrom818 said:
Of course he's stronger. He did go up in weight. I think the scary thing is that he retained his speed which is something Marquez couldn't do in his fight against Mayweather.

I agree with the speed comment, which to me is more surprising. It's not always the case that a fighter retains strength when going up.
 

see5harp

Member
harSon said:
You're part of the problem. Pacquiao and Mayweather are two completely different boxers, one is an offensive brawler while the other is a defensive counter-puncher. It's not that Mayweather couldn't beat Hatton and DLH like Pacquiao has, his boxing style simply doesn't allow it. This is the problem with all sports, from a spectators standpoint, Offense is always more electrifying than Defense resulting in skewed rankings.

Which is why Mayweather was thought of as P4P champ for years before Pacquiao starting eating up heavier opponents?
 

SUPREME1

Banned
harSon said:
You're part of the problem. Pacquiao and Mayweather are two completely different boxers, one is an offensive brawler while the other is a defensive counter-puncher. It's not that Mayweather couldn't beat Hatton and DLH like Pacquiao has, his boxing style simply doesn't allow it. This is the problem with all sports, from a spectators standpoint, Offense is always more electrifying than Defense resulting in skewed rankings.


...And that does not answer the question of why Mayweather refuses to fight good bigger guys who actually pose a threat.

All I'm saying is that Pacquiao faces bigger challenges than Mayweather. I don't think you can deny that.

Again, I don't think Mayweather can be beat. He's too good at what he does. Especially when the fighter he faces really doesnt even pose a danger to begin with.

Paul Williams or bust.
 

harSon

Banned
ImperialConquest said:
...And that does not answer the question of why Mayweather refuses to fight good bigger guys who actually pose a threat.

All I'm saying is that Pacquiao faces bigger challenges than Mayweather. I don't think you can deny that.

Again, I don't think Mayweather can be beat. He's too good at what he does. Especially when the fighter he faces really doesnt even pose a danger to begin with.

Paul Williams or bust.

He's not going to fight anyone who doesn't have a giant price tag attached to their ear, get over it. IF fighting Paul Williams was worth a huge pay day, and he isn't, then Mayweather would most likely fight him at some point. The only people I see Mayweather fighting is Pacquiao and Mosley (or Andre Berto) if he manages to become a household name again. Maybe Cotto but I doubt it considering his reputation as a fighter has taken a massive hit.
 

see5harp

Member
harSon said:
There's nothing he can do to Manny that hasn't already been done to him. He can knock him to the canvas, beat him by decision, or knock him out and it won't really mean anything considering the fact that it has all happened before. On the flip side; Mayweather has never been knocked down, lost a fight, or knocked out. In Pacquiao's case, a win over Mayweather would be historic, while a win for Mayweather will be seen as little more than another solid win.

You forgot to quote Mayweather.
 
There's nothing he can do to Manny that hasn't already been done to him. He can knock him to the canvas, beat him by decision, or knock him out and it won't really mean anything considering the fact that it has all happened before. On the flip side; Mayweather has never been knocked down, lost a fight, or knocked out. In Pacquiao's case, a win over Mayweather would be historic, while a win for Mayweather will be seen as little more than another solid win.

Sorry, but that ignores the official P4P rankings.

If PBF wants to claim the title of #1 P4P fighter in the world today, he will have to beat Manny.

If that isn't enough motivation for Floyd he needs to accept that fact he ain't #1 P4P anymore.

Quite simple, and knowing his ego I expect it to be motivation enough for him to commit to the fight.
 
harSon said:
All smart Champions pick and choose their opponents. Why didn't Pacquiao fight Mosley, Margarito, Berto, Paul Williams, etc?

I still don't get why Mayweather receives little credit for defeating Hatton and De La Hoya while Pacquiao simultaniously gets his dick slobbered for doing the same.

Mayweather gets little credit from me for beating Hatton because it wasn't at Hatton's best weight, thereby tilting the odds in PBF's favour. Hatton had only fought at Welter once previously and that was in his much disputed win against Collazo, where the light hitting Collazo had Hatton out on his feet in the twelfth.

As for the DLH fight, most people were expecting PBF to win against the part-timer and he did, in a boring split decision win.

Pacman was widely tipped to lose against DLH (many people were criticising DLH for picking on a smaller man) but Manny went out there and destroyed him.

harSon said:
He's not going to fight anyone who doesn't have a giant price tag attached to their ear, get over it. IF fighting Paul Williams was worth a huge pay day, and he isn't, then Mayweather would most likely fight him at some point. The only people I see Mayweather fighting is Pacquiao and Mosley (or Andre Berto) if he manages to become a household name again. Maybe Cotto but I doubt it considering his reputation as a fighter has taken a massive hit.

Oh, you're one of those 'fans'.
 
gollumsluvslave said:
Sorry, but that ignores the official P4P rankings.

If PBF wants to claim the title of #1 P4P fighter in the world today, he will have to beat Manny.

If that isn't enough motivation for Floyd he needs to accept that fact he ain't #1 P4P anymore.

Quite simple, and knowing his ego I expect it to be motivation enough for him to commit to the fight.

P4P is a subjective rankings list, nothing official about it. Having said that, I'd have Manny there on current achievements, seeing as PBF 'retired' thereby defaulting his place at the top of the tree.

As I've said before, there's no doubt in my mind that this fight will take place but I'm fully expecting a dominant performance from PBF. Detractors won't be able to use the 'He beat a smaller man excuse' as Pac has now proved that he belongs at Welter having destroyed the consensus number one at that weight (in a lot of peoples eyes).
 

see5harp

Member
Mayweather tries to use the "he got knocked down, knocked out, lost to old fighters" argument to belittle Pacquiao and give reasons why the fight wouldn't make sense. Yes, Pac man doesn't have a perfect record (this goes for many great current day fighters including Bernard Hopkins, Roy Jones Jr., Eric Morales, Barrera, etc., etc. etc.). But then Floyd has fought plenty of fighters with imperfect records like Zab Judah and De La Hoya.

He claims that Pacquiao is a yes man and doesn't pick his own fights. We've all heard Floyd defer comments to his management team and Leonard Ellerbe. I love Floyd as a fighter, but he needs to stop acting like he's the smartest guy in the room. News flash Floyd...no one gives you respect because you have no knockout power and no one likes you outside of hardcore boxing fans. No one respects him because with him there's no reciprocity.
 
see5harp said:
Mayweather tries to use the "he got knocked down, knocked out, lost to old fighters" argument to belittle Pacquiao and give reasons why the fight wouldn't make sense. Yes, Pac man doesn't have a perfect record (this goes for many great current day fighters including Bernard Hopkins, Roy Jones Jr., Eric Morales, Barrera, etc., etc. etc.). But then Floyd has fought plenty of fighters with imperfect records like Zab Judah and De La Hoya.

He claims that Pacquiao is a yes man and doesn't pick his own fights. We've all heard Floyd defer comments to his management team and Leonard Ellerbe. I love Floyd as a fighter, but he needs to stop acting like he's the smartest guy in the room. News flash Floyd...no one gives you respect because you have no knockout power and no one likes you outside of hardcore boxing fans. No one respects him because with him there's no reciprocity.



How could I have not mentioned that? Fighting Zab immediately after he lost to a journeyman :lol


PBF on fighting Mosley and Pacquiao not calling him out
 

harSon

Banned
see5harp said:
Mayweather tries to use the "he got knocked down, knocked out, lost to old fighters" argument to belittle Pacquiao and give reasons why the fight wouldn't make sense. Yes, Pac man doesn't have a perfect record (this goes for many great current day fighters including Bernard Hopkins, Roy Jones Jr., Eric Morales, Barrera, etc., etc. etc.). But then Floyd has fought plenty of fighters with imperfect records like Zab Judah and De La Hoya.

He claims that Pacquiao is a yes man and doesn't pick his own fights. We've all heard Floyd defer comments to his management team and Leonard Ellerbe. I love Floyd as a fighter, but he needs to stop acting like he's the smartest guy in the room. News flash Floyd...no one gives you respect because you have no knockout power and no one likes you outside of hardcore boxing fans. No one respects him because with him there's no reciprocity.

These people are part of the problem.
 

see5harp

Member
You can be a perfectly fine boxer with little knockout power. His dismantled JMM with his speed and defense. It had nothing to do with power or size. Saying Pacquiao is one dimensional and trying to call out Bernard Hopkins isn't really helping his image though. I don't find a reason to defend Floyd from the casual fans, because he gives me no reason to. He complains that he gets no respect. Well respect doesn't pay your million dollar light bills Floyd. Get the fuck outta here with that bullshit.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
tumblr_kt58hqpWEg1qzf2s2o1_500.jpg
 
Top Bottom