Spike Spiegel
Member
To be fair, they did end up serving jury duty.DarienA said:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Breaking News on MJackson on ABC right now
- Thread starter themadcowtipper
- Start date
- Status
themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
Msnbc is playing the jury is to stupid card and Fox New 's Shepard Smith is going to give himself a heart attack he is so pissed off...
Smiles and Cries
Member
I'm not reading this whole thread :lol
I missed the fun
I'm happy for MJ that freak needs to stay away from all people now
I missed the fun
I'm happy for MJ that freak needs to stay away from all people now
radioheadrule83
Banned
He should close neverland and stop being 'friends' with kids other than his own. While he's at it he could be a real friend and stop the whole mask wearing, dangling out of windows shit. It'd solve his money problems and erase one source of these allegations. You can't erase the other source - because that's who he is.
I really hope justice has been served. It's sad to see people questioning the integrity / intelligence of the jury. People seemingly would prefer trial by media.
I really hope justice has been served. It's sad to see people questioning the integrity / intelligence of the jury. People seemingly would prefer trial by media.
Kobun Heat
Member
I love you guys. Honestly, I don't know what's more precious:
1) the fact that, for the hour or so that I watched it today, Fox News had two legal analysts who were rabidly in favor of "not guilty on all counts" and one ("Teflon Molester") who was looking for guilty verdicts on some counts... and you guys just jump on the one out of the three who you thought was right-wing, or
2) the concept that wanting an obvious child molester to go to jail is somehow the conservative right-wing party-line viewpoint.
1) the fact that, for the hour or so that I watched it today, Fox News had two legal analysts who were rabidly in favor of "not guilty on all counts" and one ("Teflon Molester") who was looking for guilty verdicts on some counts... and you guys just jump on the one out of the three who you thought was right-wing, or
2) the concept that wanting an obvious child molester to go to jail is somehow the conservative right-wing party-line viewpoint.
Ninja Scooter
Member
Kobun Heat said:
obvious?
SolidSnakex
Member
Kobun Heat said:
Here we go...Even after you're proven innocent you're still guilty.
Kobun Heat
Member
Innocence under the eyes of the law and actual innocence are two very different things. To name a rather belabored example: OJ killed his wife and her friend, but he was found not guilty.
Ninja Scooter
Member
Kobun Heat said:
unless you were in the room when Michael Jackson was sucking off 12 year olds, you don't know that they are two very different things. The case presented against MJ was largely a joke, and thats all we, the jury, or anyone else has to go on.
themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
Hell , He has to be guilty , because he is so weird, everyone knows that if they had MJ's money, they be banging chicks all day long, not having freckin sensor under their bed...fry him......It is a sad day for justice, now the MJackson can never be convicted of child molest in California now, because he got off.......................................................................................................................
.................................... :lol
.................................... :lol
ManaByte
Member
themadcowtipper said:
http://www.csp.state.co.us/academy/ar797.htm
So if another 14 year old comes along and accuses Jackson, Sneddon can't put him up for the same crime in the same court.
Teknopathetic
Member
Wow, Kobun, you're a fucking idiot. I'd bother to make that nicer, but I don't honestly think there's more than 3 people on the forum right now that aren't thinking the same sentence verbatim.
"So if another 14 year old comes along and accuses Jackson, Sneddon can't put him up for the same crime in the same court."
No, No, No, No, No, NO. Manabyte. Shut up. The same crime meaning the same instance of a crime. AKA, I rob a bank on May 13th of 2001 and get acquitted, I can't be tried for the robbery on May 13th of 2001 again. If I rob a bank on June 6th, 2003, I *CAN* be tried again.
Now, please go away.
"So if another 14 year old comes along and accuses Jackson, Sneddon can't put him up for the same crime in the same court."
No, No, No, No, No, NO. Manabyte. Shut up. The same crime meaning the same instance of a crime. AKA, I rob a bank on May 13th of 2001 and get acquitted, I can't be tried for the robbery on May 13th of 2001 again. If I rob a bank on June 6th, 2003, I *CAN* be tried again.
Now, please go away.
Ninja Scooter
Member
ManaByte said:
same crime=molesting the same boy in the same instance. He cannot be tried for that again. You think you just figured out some magical loophole in california law that nobody has noticed for past 20 years? Who do you think you are, Ashley Judd?
SHHH, nobody tell OJ about this, he'll kill all of us. ALL OF US!
ManaByte said:
For the same crime. Meaning, the same criminal act in terms of time, place, and violation. Double jeopardy protects Michael from being prosecuted in the event that new evidence is presented that he did, in fact, molest this specific boy.
Hell, if Jackson molested this kid tomorrow, he could be dragged back into court.
Think. What you're suggesting is that a bank robber can be acquitted, then walk across the street and rob a bank again with no repercussions.
Phoenix
Member
typhonsentra said:
The difference being that political analysts can at best give an opinion based on polls, game industry analysts are acting mostly on their own perception, legal analysts however have the law and the facts to work with. With those two things they should at least be able to render an opinion based on the actual facts of the case - not their opinions, which is obvious what they were using. The folks on Fox News and MSNBC are hilarious.... the discussion on CNN has actually been about the case, talking with jurors, the evidence and what more would have been needed to convict.
themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
Willco said:
the Question is who would win in a "Kill OFf"
themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
ManaByte said:
I don't know OJ is know to go into "coke rages" and is still in decent shape... Blake is old....
Kobun Heat
Member
DarienA said:
Teknopathetic said:
So... do you guys have actual positions you'd like to stake out here, or what?
SolidSnakex
Member
:lol BET is playing Thriller now.
Ignatz Mouse
Banned
SolidSnakex said:
He wasn't proven innocent, he was not found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Not the same thing.
I think Jackson's a child molester. I dont think anyone should go to jail until it's proven though, and it wasn't.
Ninja Scooter
Member
:lol "The Teflon Molester"
Do The Mario
Unconfirmed Member
Fuck yeah!!!!
Go jacko!!!!!!
Just woke up to the news in Australia, its made my day coz i got my first exam in the arvo!
Go jacko!!!!!!
Just woke up to the news in Australia, its made my day coz i got my first exam in the arvo!
Ninja Scooter
Member
DMczaf said:Jordan just got the call! PARTY AT THE RANCH!
is he gonna bring the body double?
"Haha, you're gonna have to stay home for this one, honey. Remember what
happened the last time i took you to one of Jacko's parties and got drunk..."
SolidSnakex
Member
Oooh Nancy Grace, you never fail to impress
"Others are also disappointed, because now it seems like the only way you can win a verdict in a US courtroom is to have a deep pocket to be going up against a little boy."
"Others are also disappointed, because now it seems like the only way you can win a verdict in a US courtroom is to have a deep pocket to be going up against a little boy."
The guy is a social recluse, has no girlfriend, hangs around with children, had children through a mock marriage etc All of which are NOT crimes. Its funny that he is being compared to Peter Pan, because as we know the writter of it was accused of the same crimes. Sexual assault is pretty much always a he said- she/he said thing. It must have been tough for the jury, cause both sides have zero credibility.
- Status