Wheee lunchtime
Oh of course there are other issues, and I still stand by my point that uncontrolled immigration puts too much strain on public services, and that is also a factor for me in voting for brexit.
I heard and somewhat understand the counter argument that I should focus these particular frustrations on the politicians, Who are not reinvesting the money immigrants pay into our economy back into these services. But I think the issue is more the speed at which demand is increasing, and controlled immigration would allow for controlled growth. So I'm not anti immigration, just want them to cap it to a reasonable level, especially with all the mass movement of folks happening at the moment
Anyhow, my concern is still about democracy and accountability.
Nobody ever asks what I'd want the EU to do, to change my mind. But I'd happily change my stance if the EU were properly audited, only created international laws regarding trade, and ruled out ever creating a new joint military.
They are fucking properly audited. It's a fucking tabloid myth that they aren't. There's a percentage of error (3.8% at last count) in the accounts mainly due to the fact a large proportion of the money is handed to the member governments to spend
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36276175
Honest to fuck.
And most of the things you dislike about the EU are pretty integral to the good things about it. A Single Market wouldn't work without some central body setting rules, and the most democratic way of doing that is a parliament and executive. If capital, services and goods can freely move, then labour must be able to also do so to counteract capital flight (and to allow delivery of services), it's not some hippy happy clappy dogma, there's pretty defined economy rationale behind it.
btw the 'EU' military is by and large a joint procurement exercise, not that you'd know that from reading the UK press. The UK was largely prissy about it because BAE's tat doesn't sell well and would have been pretty much cut out.