• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bush cares more about war than college tuition

Status
Not open for further replies.

XS+

Banned
No doubt, this is to fund his illegal war. What a twisted man. So, a family income of $35,000 can afford college? I'm sure they'll offer recent dropouts incentives to join the armed forces. I hate Bush so much. But you know who I hate even more? The people who voted for him.

US aid for college students slashed
Change in rules to affect almost 1.3m

By Marcella Bombardieri, Globe Staff | November 23, 2004

Nearly a quarter of low- and moderate-income college students who currently qualify for federal Pell grants will see their awards reduced or eliminated under a change in federal rules that Congress allowed in its new spending bill passed over the weekend, according to an estimate from higher education analysts.
ADVERTISEMENT


About 85,000 of the 5.2 million students currently eligible to receive Pell grants will become ineligible. And 1.2 million others will get a smaller award under a new formula the government will use to determine how much families can afford to pay for college, according to estimates from the American Council on Education, or ACE. The change will take effect for students starting or returning to classes next summer or fall.

Higher education officials worry that the change, estimated to save the government about $300 million in next year's budget, will hurt students already struggling to pay for college.

''Nobody knows if the change will actually lead anybody to abandon their plans for postsecondary education," said Terry Hartle, senior vice president at ACE. ''The best-case scenario is that families will have to dig deeper to pay for college, perhaps by working more hours or taking out more loans."

The effects could be much more widespread than the council's estimates suggest. The same federal formulas are used to calculate federally subsidized loans, state aid, and grants that colleges make to their students, said Brian K. Fitzgerald, staff director of the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.

The change was proposed last year by the US Department of Education. It was blocked at the time by congressional legislation, but this year Republican leaders allowed the change to go through.

The new Department of Education aid formula was intended to reflect a reduction in income taxes in many states, but some analysts say the tax burden is measured in a flawed way that does not reflect actual increases in taxes in the past several years. The formula is supposed to be updated every year, but it had not been adjusted in many years.

Some Republicans say the formula needed to be updated to help deal with the Pell program's $4 billion deficit and to ultimately increase the maximum award.

Pell grants, the main federal program to help low- and moderate-income families pay for college, will cost $12.5 billion next year, according to ACE estimates. Although the $4,050 maximum grant has been virtually frozen for four years, about 1.2 million more students have become eligible for the Pell grants in that time, leading to the budget squeeze.

It is not clear yet which students will lose their Pell grants, but Fitzgerald said it most likely will be those with family incomes at the higher levels of Pell eligibility, perhaps $35,000 to $40,000, Fitzgerald said. These students already receive far less than the maximum grant. Many other students with lower family incomes will see their grants reduced by up to a few hundred dollars, Fitzgerald estimated.

Families will learn whether they are losing grant money when they receive information about their aid packages for next year.

Meanwhile, the Pell grant is covering less of the cost of a college education each year. The average Pell grant covered a third of the cost of the average four-year public college in the 1980-81 school year. Last year, the average Pell grant covered a quarter of the cost, according to the College Board.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Tommie Hu$tle said:
You would too if both your kids were out of college.
Sarcasm? Or a ridiculous and offensive generalization about everyone being selfish and only concerned with their own benefit when it comes to politics and law?
 
Dan said:
Sarcasm? Or a ridiculous and offensive generalization about everyone being selfish and only concerned with their own benefit when it comes to politics and law?
:lol

I only report, you decide.
 
Dan said:
Sarcasm? Or a ridiculous and offensive generalization about everyone being selfish and only concerned with their own benefit when it comes to politics and law?
I thought that comment was made in relation to the draft?
 

White Man

Member
Fuck. Maybe I won't be returning to college next year.

I just know he's going to slash NEA funding. That would destroy all my current plans. I can't believe this guy won the election legitimately. I hope he gets a degenerative brain disorder. And spinal meningitis.
 

DarthWoo

I'm glad Grandpa porked a Chinese Muslim
Cyan said:
It's "No CHILD left behind," not "No student left behind." Hater.


I'm starting to wonder.... Was there a part of "No Child Left Behind" that was left off to make it look better? Maybe it was actually "No Child Left Behind When The Troop Transports Embark."
 

DarthWoo

I'm glad Grandpa porked a Chinese Muslim
MrAngryFace said:
You dumbfucks! How much of an education do you NEED to pull a damned trigger/!??!?!?!

AAsqLogosmaller.jpg


And it's free!
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
if you guys loved your country and were patriots, you'd realize that bush's plan is to have all straight men under 30 drop out of work/school and play Americas Army until they realize how fun being in the infantry is, and all women will function as a brood mare for the State.

Kerry didn't play Americas Army... he played SOCOM, and look what happened to HIM. Do you want to risk the same destiny?
 
''The best-case scenario is that families will have to dig deeper to pay for college, perhaps by working more hours or taking out more loans."


^^What the hell? They want people to work MORE hours, when they're probably working way too many as it is? This is pretty ridiculous. You hear everyone saying "education is the key to the future.." "all kids deserve a good education" blah blah, yet they completely screw the kids of middle-low income families out of one. Maybe they're trying to get rid of the middle class and return to how it was back when only the elites could afford education and the lower class people have no chance to have a good life. If you ask me, it's time for them to revamp the entire higher education system, and get away from all this campus prestige bullshit and concentrate on the actual EDUCATION.
 

marko

Member
Although this at first seems bad, considering a total of 1.28 million people are going to saving the country an average of $300 million a year, that pretty much averages out to a 1/4 of people getting a pell grant are going to be taking a $300 per year ($150 per semester) pell grant cut. Not that much at all, plus total government pell grant spending will be going up due to demand. Here is a better article.

coloradoan
 

Santo

Junior Member
Didn't Bush tell us during the debates that we can all go back to community college if we can't find a job in the market? HOW AM I GOING TO AFFORD DA COMMUNITIES COLLEGERS NOW?
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
If less of us get money to go to school... how the hell will we find out where Poland is?!?!?!
 

DonasaurusRex

Online Ho Champ
....Notice that congress passed this , I swear people need to pay way more attention to the senators and house reps they are sending to capitol hill.
 

cubanb

Banned
well this is my last year, so lets focus the efforts on the war..... none of my dollars shalll go to war!
 

Azih

Member
that pretty much averages out to a 1/4 of people getting a pell grant are going to be taking a $300 per year ($150 per semester) pell grant cut
I find that math suspect but even then.. what about the other poor bastards that make up 3/4ths?
 

shoplifter

Member
iirc, they're also going to stop subsidizing student loans, which means goodbye to those 3% interest rates on them, and hello to owing $30,000 at 7-9% interest.

There is no reason that with as much money as the government brings in, that we can't afford to provide ALL people who want one a college-level education for free. If you are accepted to X College, it's free.

Richie Riches (and others who can find the means) can still go to their private schools, but the gov't won't be paying for it.
 

marko

Member
Azih said:
I find that math suspect but even then.. what about the other poor bastards that make up 3/4ths?

5 million people get pell grants, 1.28 million are getting their pell grant cut or elimintated. Expected savings of 300 million, $300 cut per person seems about right. My take is the other 3/4s are expected to get the same amount. Plus, the article linked mentions the average $300 cut for 1 million students.

With the major increase in the amount of people getting a pell grant over the past 4 years, this cut really seems to be close to a non-issue, especially if government stops subsidising student loans like the one poster mentions. That is big.
 

Azih

Member
Alright I can see that.

Still though averaging the number is fairly misleading unless there's a good reason for doing so.

the average ignores the 85000 who are getting kicked off the rolls entirely, and since financial hardship is a leading (if not the leading, though that's a guess) cause for dropping out of college then any reduction for the remaining 1.2 million is going to be devestating for a large number of them.

Plus cuts like this increase social disparity and widen the gap between the rich and the poor, and that's never a good thing.

Edit: It's not a non issue it's pretty big, though refusing to subsidise college loans is MUCH MUCH larger of an issue to be sure.
 

XS+

Banned
shoplifter said:
iirc, they're also going to stop subsidizing student loans, which means goodbye to those 3% interest rates on them, and hello to owing $30,000 at 7-9% interest.

There is no reason that with as much money as the government brings in, that we can't afford to provide ALL people who want one a college-level education for free. If you are accepted to X College, it's free.

Richie Riches (and others who can find the means) can still go to their private schools, but the gov't won't be paying for it.

In a country as wealthy as ours, no one willing to become educated should go without a college education. Instead, Bush and his cronies would rather spend billions to bomb Muslims and steal oil than educate American children. That is the state of social and intellectual disrepair our country now finds itself besieged with. Bush talks of an "ownership society." Truer words were never spoken. It's the "for-profit" age, people. If you can't contribute a dollar to our economy, you're not wanted. Outsourcing? Fine by me. Higher tuition? Fine by me. $5 per gallon? Fine by me. And when the next election rolls around, conservatives will march out the next cultural bogeyman -- and, as they did a month ago, they will win.
 

ge-man

Member
XS+ said:
In a country as wealthy as ours, no one willing to become educated should go without a college education. Instead, Bush and his cronies would rather spend billions to bomb Muslims and steal oil than educate American children. That is the state of social and intellectual disrepair our country now finds itself besieged with. Bush talks of an "ownership society." Truer words were never spoken. It's the "for-profit" age, people. If you can't contribute a dollar to our economy, you're not wanted. Outsourcing? Fine by me. Higher tuition? Fine by me. $5 per gallon? Fine by me. And when the next election rolls around, conservatives will march out the next cultural bogeyman -- and, as they did a month ago, they will win.

You summarized how I feel about this situation. What is it going to take for people to realize that Bush and his circle of neo-conservative douches do not have the peoples interests at heart? The appeal to ideology that won them the election isn't even genuine--the ultimately measure of policy seems to be "money talks."
 

XS+

Banned
mac said:
But if people become too smart they will become Democrats!

While there may be more intellectuals that are ideologically aligned with the Democrats, the counterestablishment erected by conservative intellectuals has become a force to reckon with. From talk radio to think tanks, these centers of rightist propaganda, free from academic restraint, have shaped this country's political landscape. Until there is an answer from the left, the right will continue to drive dialogue and lay claim to the political morality of conservatism.
 

Otaking

Member
Well....I'm fucked up the river without a paddle. Back when I looked into college loans and grants, I remember hearing that Pell grant thing mentioned. If I don't get enough support to go to college...what am I supposed to do? I'll be at my minimum-wage job for the year it takes to get a $0.50 raise. Then another year after that another $0.50. I'm already working a full 40 hour week as is. How can I 'work more hours' without sacrificing my sleep and life. Really now....I feel screwed if this is as bad as it sounds.
 
XS+ said:
While there may be more intellectuals that are ideologically aligned with the Democrats, the counterestablishment erected by conservative intellectuals has become a force to reckon with. From talk radio to think tanks, these centers of rightist propaganda, free from academic restraint, have shaped this country's political landscape. Until there is an answer from the left, the right will continue to drive dialogue and lay claim to the political morality of conservatism.

Well, Air America has been expanding recently and supposedly there are newer think tanks being funded by the left. Even though it's catch-up, at least something is being done.

We do need a liberal Fox news though.
 

MetatronM

Unconfirmed Member
Nearly a quarter of low- and moderate-income college students who currently qualify for federal Pell grants will see their awards reduced or eliminated under a change in federal rules that Congress allowed in its new spending bill passed over the weekend, according to an estimate from higher education analysts.
You know, I hate Bush and all, but can we direct the hate towards the appropriate people every once in a while? Contrary to popular belief, not everything the government does is a direct order from the Fuhrer.
 

shoplifter

Member
MetatronM said:
You know, I hate Bush and all, but can we direct the hate towards the appropriate people every once in a while? Contrary to popular belief, not everything the government does is a direct order from the Fuhrer.

He has the opportunity to veto anything Congress passes, yet he hasn't done it ONCE since taking office.
 

adam20

Member
Celicar said:
Sounds great. I have a full scholarship so I don't pay for anything. Keep jackin the tuition up!!! :lol

oh shut up you sick f---. I wonder who you voted/would vote for (sarcasm). People like you are repulsing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom