If the American taxpayers have not decided that this procedure should be paid for publicly for free persons who cannot afford it, why is it being given to a convicted murderer?
I'm not saying neither should have it but the concept of a convicted murderer having this procedure paid for when a law abiding person cannot is what is getting people upset here.
Convicted murderers should have less rights than free innocent people.
The American taxpayers HAVE decided that this procedure, being a life-saving procedure, being a procedure that spares the patient from needless suffering, should be paid for publicly. They didn't decide on this one individually, they decided that, as a whole, if it will save their life, it is the responsibility of the state or State in question to do so.
Because to do otherwise is a human rights violation. You remember those, right? Human rights? The thing that separates us from the heretofore "second world" and "third world," because we have them whereas they eschew them?
This is the race to the bottom. In denying her this surgery, you are saying that she is worth less than any other prisoner.
Because she suffers from gender dysphoria.
You might not have put that together. You might think that you aren't really saying that, that you are above such things, but your implicit bias shows.
I'm not mad at you for it. I'm not going to judge you for it. But please. Please understand.