chromhound
Gold Member
People that can't afford an EV will take the Bus/Train/Taxi and you will love it
They'll be okay. Heavily used and stored reserves for the great war machine.Is the gasoline cartel ok with this?
I remember finding out about those cars last year, seemed interesting.Agreed. EVs are not the answer.
Serious question, but does anybody know why hydrogen cars never caught on? They seem to be a great alternative to petrol and EV. Why aren't manufacturers making more hydrogen cars?
This is a relatively easy problem to solve, especially once it becomes an issue of significance. There's money to be made in EV battery refurbs.
The unis and business parks will probably not be priced much better, to those that are allowed to use them....
I cannot wait to see what they charge at our future charging stations. I'ma take a wild guess. Universities and business parks will have rows of beautiful solar shaded charging stations. When you get shooed away from those and you don't own a home, you'll have to go to a Chevron station where the charging is priced 'competitvely' with gas because 'convenience'.
This whole this is so silicon valley.
The end goal is to have economies of scale kick in before the shift becomes permanent. This means people finding cheaper and more efficient ways to extend the life of car batteries, or refurbish them. There's no real reason buying a used EV should be any more costly or difficult than buying a used petrol car. The material cost isn't the leading factor in the price consumers pay. Supply and demand should factor in the same as they do now, and you'll find EVs that are at all levels of the consumer scale. There should be offerings for lower, middle, and upper class earners. Anyone who can't afford an EV in 2035, probably can't afford a petrol car now.I said poor people aren't going to be able to afford to keep these things on the road and you tell me there's good money in refurbishing batteries. A Tesla refurb seems to be around $10k? Maybe I'm wrong I just googled it. I'm not seeing how that solves my concern. If you can get a refurbished battery for $3000 or less then maybe. Im not sure how it's done or how much it could come down. And I'll be skeptical of any promises.
...
I cannot wait to see what they charge at our future charging stations. I'ma take a wild guess. Universities and business parks will have rows of beautiful solar shaded charging stations. When you get shooed away from those and you don't own a home, you'll have to go to a Chevron station where the charging is priced 'competitvely' with gas because 'convenience'.
This whole this is so silicon valley.
climate change is a serious threat whether you believe in it or not, but i do agree this won't solve the bigger issues concerned with it. It will help, but USA needs to get off its reliance on personal vehicles anyways and we need to actually start building up our public transit. Not only will it help the environment more, but it will also reduce traffic. It's dumb as hell that the 7million+ city i lived in in China had less traffic than the 400k-ish city I live in Alabama. But at the same time the Mass transit is garbage here in bama. my 15 minute commute would be 1 hour and 30 minutes on transit. It's bloody insane.How about pass laws that:
1. Ban private commuter planes
2. Ban private commuter helicopters
3. Ban cruise ships entirely
4. Heavily tax companies that force office workers to commute to work that can be done at home
5. Tax cars based on weight so we can actually use the Laws of Physics properly and not stick a giant ass lithium battery in a fucking F150 that will be used 2-3 times a year as an actual truck if that.
When they do all of those things I will finally believe that global warming is a serious threat.
Edit: Forgot the most obvious thing, whever a bald fucker shoots himself into space for no fucking reason at all we shoot the fucker down with a missile.
The end goal is to have economies of scale kick in before the shift becomes permanent. This means people finding cheaper and more efficient ways to extend the life of car batteries, or refurbish them. There's no real reason buying a used EV should be any more costly or difficult than buying a used petrol car. The material cost isn't the leading factor in the price consumers pay. Supply and demand should factor in the same as they do now, and you'll find EVs that are at all levels of the consumer scale. There should be offerings for lower, middle, and upper class earners. Anyone who can't afford an EV in 2035, probably can't afford a petrol car now.
I think it's a bit shortsighted to look at the state of the EV market now, and assume that is the kind of situation California is pushing its citizens towards. I think where any sensible legislator will want consumers to end up is in a situation the same or better than what we have now with petrol cars. The infrastructure isn't there yet, but that's why they set a target of 2035. That is plenty of time to get the pieces in place to make this work.
As peak oil continues to loom on the horizon, there is very little economic argument for sticking with gas cars, that isn't focused solely on the near-term. Long-term and sustainable solutions have to be via the EV market.
I look forward to exciting EV car chases in movies, the brrrr, whrrrrr and zippp of the motors.
Jesus my sister has an electric car and she always risk to run over old people because it doesn't make a fucking sound...I look forward to exciting EV car chases in movies, the brrrr, whrrrrr and zippp of the motors.
it's not about being stupid, it's about monied interests. everyone has to get paid at every bloody step. it's why it'll never be finished. profit motive rules all here and it doesn't matter how good something will be for this country if it doesn't generate a profit.btw if you don't know california, here's a little picture: We've spent a lot of money over many years trying to build a high speed train from sf to la and have got basically nothing done. The majority of people want to help the environment but we're just too stupid here. Halp.
Silence peasants, private plane and yachts for us, no cheap gasoline and ICE cars for you.
Yep.Silence peasants, private plane and yachts for us, no cheap gasoline and ICE cars for you.
Sold June 2019. I disagree with the value assessment, even the dealer knew they were low balling me but they admitted to not knowing what they would get out of it and ultimately they gave me the best offer. Unfortunately I just didn’t have time to find a private buyer.When was this?
I don't like Tesla (ugly, fat plain cars), but their resale values are generally pretty good.
A $30K hit on a $110K car that you sold to a dealership is actually not bad if this was pre-COVID. Post COVID, the resale values are higher. You'll also always get more private sale.
Have you seen truck prices?
Maybe they are cheaper where you are but here in Texas a new truck that is lifted with all the bells and whistles is 75k+ regularly. Less if you go used maybe. 6 figures if you want the highest end examples. Add that to your price at the pump for driving a 10mpg monstrosity?
Bankrupt is obviously an exaggeration, but you get my point lol
The used car market is much stronger now post COVID than it was in 2019 (although it is starting to soften again). Its an apples to oranges comparison. Honestly, you likely could have done better by about 10-15k. Tesla's hold their values decently well. I suspect you got low balled because were desperate to sell due your time constraints and took the dealer at their word (they have a very good idea how much they can sell your car for). But all-in-all 72% of your MSRP on a 2 year old car sold to a dealership is pretty standard pre-COVID, just low for the car you were trading in:Sold June 2019. I disagree with the value assessment, even the dealer knew they were low balling me but they admitted to not knowing what they would get out of it and ultimately they gave me the best offer. Unfortunately I just didn’t have time to find a private buyer.
Last week I sold a 1 year 16k mile Toyota Venza Hybrid to a dealer at the cost of $6k!
The Tesla Model S was at 36.3 percent and the Model X lost 33.9 percent, which also beat the average depreciation for all cars (both EVs and internal-combustion vehicles) coming off three-year leases this year, which was 39.1 percent. For trucks it was 34.3 percent, and for SUVs it was 39.7 percent.
You think those lifted monster trucks are getting that kind of mileage? Because that was what I was talking about.The new F150 gets 19mpg city and 24 MPG highway,
You can get a f150 v6 that does 22city and 30 highway in 2wd
Engine efficiency in the last 10 years has improved dramatically, better than most 10 year old cars.
Amazon are selling 50,000 AA batteries with free shipping. Maiden Voyage give me your Prime password, I need to fill up my EV.
The big problem for me is charging time. For the final version, they really need a One In - One Out model:
Make batteries standardized and interchangeable (like AA's, AAA's etc).
When you go to the station you eject your battery for recharging and get one that's already charged.
Sure the station has to store the batteries while charging them: they can use the space where the underground petrol tanks used to be.
I know, I know, this will never happen
But you can't tow with it“The state” huh?
One benefit of the F-150 Lightning is you can power a house with it during blackouts…you know, like the one that happened in Texas not too long ago causing everyone’s pipes to freeze, and hundreds to die from either the cold or carbon monoxide poisoning trying to stay warm…
But you can't tow with it
I mean the elites have zero skin in the game at all. So why should I?
btw if you don't know california, here's a little picture: We've spent a lot of money over many years trying to build a high speed train from sf to la and have got basically nothing done. The majority of people want to help the environment but we're just too stupid here. Halp.
Nevada is closerGuess you will have to drive to AZ to buy one.
Hard to make a useful hydrogen car that is not a bomb. Even more so than one filled with gasoline.Agreed. EVs are not the answer.
Serious question, but does anybody know why hydrogen cars never caught on? They seem to be a great alternative to petrol and EV. Why aren't manufacturers making more hydrogen cars?
Look at those prices lol
Tesla Battery Replacement Cost (Model X, S, Y & 3) - Climatebiz
In this article, we'll go through the costs associated with the battery replacement of your Tesla electric vehicle.climatebiz.com
Do you know what you’re talking about? This is a genuine question, because I’m not the most educated on the topic but everything I’ve read states that is a myth.Hard to make a useful hydrogen car that is not a bomb. Even more so than one filled with gasoline.
fwiw, I think he called you “comrade” because you come off as a commieBecause you pulled out your usual "comrade" nonsense out of thin air like you always do. If that's not eyeroll worthy idk what is.
Certainly isn't the same as throwing insults or posting cringe gifs.
fwiw, I frankly don't give a shit.fwiw, I think he called you “comrade” because you come off as a commie
Toyota make hydrogen cars, the technology is there but probably more money in EV.Agreed. EVs are not the answer.
Serious question, but does anybody know why hydrogen cars never caught on? They seem to be a great alternative to petrol and EV. Why aren't manufacturers making more hydrogen cars?
What??????Put it this way, electricity to your home doesn't double in cost when there's a war in an oil-rich nation, or OPEC decides to close the tap. That's because the grid that will power these EVs is also transitioning away from oil. We can then blame mother nature or Ra for not providing enough wind or sunlight. But it should benefit all consumers in the long-term. In that case, it's always better to get the transition over with early.