Can a proper gamer ignore Nintendo games?

Outside of the Pokemonz, I haven't played or brought a nintendo game since Mario 64. They haven't put out anything that really interested me since then.
 
KenOD said:
Well really, this whole thread should have been "are there games one has to play to count as an enthusiast?" or something to that affect, not singling out Nintendo and falling into this same trap all Nintendo threads seem to fall into.

You make a good point. If it can derail some of the fanboy trolling, could we refocus the discussion on this point? I believe that there are games, or perhaps franchises, which one needs to play to consider themselves an enthusiast.

For example, does a gamer need to play Super Mario Galaxy 2 to be a gaming enthusiast? No.

Does a gamer need to have played at least 1 2d super mario and 1 3d super mario to be a gaming enthusiast? Yes.
 
PortTwo said:
As someone who just noticed the thread, and read the OP and will take that at face value...

...there is a question of "gaming literacy", sometimes discussed, much like reading the classics. And there is a fair point to be made in the reading of original ideas and the genesis of a style or method or genre.
I think if we're talking about history then a person who thinks of themselves as a games enthusiast cannot afford to ignore the influence of Nintendo, and even appreciate some of the design that went into Super Mario Bros or Ocarina of Time. In the same category I feel are titles like DOOM or Spacewar.

But in terms of contemporary output I don't think a "games enthusiast" has any obligation to play Nintendo's stuff, regardless of incredible it is.
 
The_Technomancer said:
Only if we take games that are likewise considered "generational experiences" like...I dunno, Mass Effect 2 and Red Dead Redemption and also say that "proper" gamers must have played them.
You see how ridiculous this quickly becomes?

You're not actually a proper gamer unless you've played Mass Effect 2 and given up halfway in disgust.
 
outunderthestars said:
I want both. Explain to me how the zelda gameplay has changed. You are still doing the exact same thing as the very first zelda game. rescue Zelda from Gannon by getting pieces of triforce kept in dengeons. You have to find a specific item in each dungeon to complete the dungeon then use that item to somehow access another part of the world. repeat until game over.
Okay explain to me how any Call of Duty game is different from any other.

You still play as a soldier, fight in a war, use guns, kill opposing enemies to war, follow terrible war-centered storyline, with some multiplayer on the side. The goal of the game is to shoot people, and get to A to B objectives with linear campaign design.

I can do this too, for any game. The fact that you think Zelda is simply just that shows that you fail to have any understanding of what Zelda actually is. If you think Twilight Princess is even remotely similar to a game like Phantom Hourglass or the original Legend of Zelda then you simply have mental problems and look at games more-so as story-telling devices than gameplay.
outunderthestars said:
Funny, you say that story isn't a part of gaming but I loved the story in Bioshock, La Noire, Red Dead Redemption, Valkyria Chronicles, Braid, Fallout 3, Portal, Mass Effect, Heavy Rain and alot more.

All of those are new or basically new IP this generation. Zelda is still nothing more than new window dressing placed atop the same stale gameplay experience.
Yet aside from Mass Effect and Valkyria Chronicles none of those games do anything new to the genres they represent whatsoever, aside from having cinematic presentation.
 
Nintendork22 said:
OgiG6.jpg
Fixed.
 
I've been gaming for nearly 30 years and I haven't touched a Nintendo game in probably 15 years. I love my hobby and play what I enjoy. I am not missing out 1 bit by passing on games that don't appeal to me, be them Nintendo or not.
 
edwardslane said:
seriously if you haven't played mario galaxy or zelda, or metroid or smash brothers mario kart in the last 5 years how can you consider yourself a hardcore gamer :P

I'll bite on this one.

Mario Galaxy I will give you. Amazing games those.

But I would argue that Zelda, Metroid, Smash Brother and Mario Kart haven't had any "essential" releases in the last 5 years. At least nothing radically different than what had come before.
 
A proper gamer plays all of his games on the PC so that he can get the best graphics, best controls, and most content for the best price. Anybody else is a casual non-gaming neophyte.
 
Nintendork22 said:
You make a good point. If it can derail some of the fanboy trolling, could we refocus the discussion on this point? I believe that there are games, or perhaps franchises, which one needs to play to consider themselves an enthusiast.

For example, does a gamer need to play Super Mario Galaxy 2 to be a gaming enthusiast? No.

Does a gamer need to have played at least 1 2d super mario and 1 3d super mario to be a gaming enthusiast? Yes.


I can say the same thing about Vectrex games. Now you're not a proper gaming enthusiast.


Once you start telling someone what they have to do to be able to consider themselves part of a hobby you become an elitist snob.
 
_Alkaline_ said:
Golden Abyss will mark the fourth Uncharted game in four years.

Your argument is incredibly flawed.

Really?

They make a game every 2 years.

Drake's Fortune: fall 2007
Among Thieves: fall 2009
Drake's Deception: fall 2011

PSV – Golden Abyss (with a different team): between fall 2011 and spring 2012

And you are counting that as 4 games in 4 years.

Meanwhile, I could turn to the number of "Mario" titles in the last four years, and what would I find?
 
I suppose you could, but if you're interested in games as an enthusiast/connoisseur, you probably shouldn't. At the very least, every self-proclaimed gamer should play through some portion of Nintendo's AAA NES/SNES/N64 library.
 
Nintendork22 said:
Does a gamer need to have played at least 1 2d super mario and 1 3d super mario to be a gaming enthusiast? Yes.
What other requirements are there? I'd love to discover the exact point at which I'm officially no longer a gaming enthusiast.
 
I have lots of friends who almost exclusively play Blizzard titles, and they are some of the best gamers (skill-wise) I know.

Mention Nintendo stuff to them, and they'll shrug it off. It's all personal preference. Me, I love playing both, but I don't consider myself more "proper" than they are at gaming.
 
PortTwo said:
Really?

They make a game every 2 years.

Drake's Fortune: fall 2007
Among Thieves: fall 2009
Drake's Deception: fall 2011

PSV – Golden Abyss (with a different team): between fall 2011 and spring 2012

And you are counting that as 4 games in 4 years.

Er, yeah.

Cause that's four games in four years, you loon.
 
PortTwo said:
Really?

They make a game every 2 years.

Drake's Fortune: fall 2007
Among Thieves: fall 2009
Drake's Deception: fall 2011

PSV – Golden Abyss (with a different team): between fall 2011 and spring 2012

And you are counting that as 4 games in 4 years.
...yes. Yes, between fall 2007 and fall 2011 are in fact four years. So its 4 Uncharted titles in 4.5 years.

Meanwhile, I could turn to the number of "Mario" titles in the last four years, and what would I find?
One 2D Mario game and two 3D Mario games. The two are barely the same genre, they just feature the same character.
 
Boney said:
I hate life D:

The new Pokemon generation look like aliens anyway.
 
The_Technomancer said:
Interesting speech. But can I ask what games you play currently?

I don't mean to sound like an ass, but I don't really see the point, unless you are searching for something that goes against my opinion through a game I may or may not be playing at present. Sorry if that sounded harsh, but that is usually where this leads... But in the interest of the thread... anything that can interest me. Currently playing through Tactics Ogre: Let us Cling Together, Beyond Good and Evil HD, The Witcher 2 and a replay of Vagrant Story.

Don't get me wrong... I can enjoy a game in a series that has had a long and storied history. But personally, I can only take so much of a game where the property itself has lost the charm it once had with me. I would prefer Nintendo return a franchise like Earthbound and apply some of the talent to a franchise that could use a fresh revival. I WANT THAT!
 
PortTwo said:
Really?

They make a game every 2 years.

Drake's Fortune: fall 2007
Among Thieves: fall 2009
Drake's Deception: fall 2011

PSV – Golden Abyss (with a different team): between fall 2011 and spring 2012

And you are counting that as 4 games in 4 years.

Meanwhile, I could turn to the number of "Mario" titles in the last four years, and what would I find?
Both Galaxy games and New Super Mario Bros. Wii are the only mainline games released in the last four years.
 
tiff said:
What other requirements are there? I'd love to discover the exact point at which I'm officially no longer a gaming enthusiast.

Can you pick up a cherry with your ass cheeks and walk over to a cup of beer and drop it in?

All while playing The Lost Levels, I might add. We all did it.
 
Do you need to read Hemingway in order to be considered a well-rounded literary critic?

Or is it ok to simply recognize his contribution, knowing that his style might not be your cup of tea?

Big One said:
Both Galaxy games and New Super Mario Bros. Wii are the only mainline games released in the last four years.
Weasel word highlighted. Nintendo doesn't get to trade on Mario's name without it "counting". They stick his name on the box, it's a Mario game. Everything else is equivocation.

_Alkaline_ said:
Cause that's four games in four years, you loon.
Yeah I was pretty clear. ;) I was trying to point out that this is not strange. And that the other game was not Naughty Dog. But I'm supporting your point, just maybe for a different reason.

Also, mind you, the dev of U1 was not instant ;)
 
gatotsu911 said:
I suppose you could, but if you're interested in games as an enthusiast/connoisseur, you probably shouldn't. At the very least, every self-proclaimed gamer should play through some portion of Nintendo's AAA NES/SNES/N64 library.


psh. Casual gamer. real gamers play all of Nintendo's virtual boy and game & watch games.

See how stupid this becomes?
 
MeBecomingI said:
I don't mean to sound like an ass, but I don't really see the point, unless you are searching for something that goes against my opinion through a game I may or may not be playing at present. Sorry if that sounded harsh, but that is usually where this leads... But in the interest of the thread... anything that can interest me. Currently playing through Tactics Ogre: Let us Cling Together, Beyond Good and Evil HD, The Witcher 2 and a replay of Vagrant Story.

Don't get me wrong... I can enjoy a game in a series that has had a long and storied history. But personally, I can only take so much of a game where the property itself has lost the charm it once had with me. I would prefer Nintendo return a franchise like Earthbound and apply some of the talent to a franchise that could use a fresh revival. I WANT THAT!
I was curious to see if you were someone who enjoyed modern franchises that feature multiple bi-yearly installments, because I was going to ask what it was that kept them fresh for you. :P
The games you're playing hardly fall into that category, and I give props to you for it. Given what it appears you do enjoy playing I'm in agreement with you, or at least I understand you.
 
The_Technomancer said:
...yes. Yes, between fall 2007 and fall 2011 are in fact four years. So its 4 Uncharted titles in 4.5 years.


One 2D Mario game and two 3D Mario games. The two are barely the same genre, they just feature the same character.


So you count the handheld uncharted but not the handheld mario games? Not counting the paper mario games either?
 
PortTwo said:
Do you need to read Hemingway in order to be considered a well-rounded literary critic?

Or is it ok to simply recognize his contribution, knowing that his style might not be your cup of tea?

Well, I hate Tolstoy, but you kind of have to at least TRY to read something by him if you want to consider yourself knowledgeable about literature... especially if it's fiction, or russian literature.

At least read the Cliff's Notes.
 
outunderthestars said:
So you count the handheld uncharted but not the handheld mario games? Not counting the paper mario games either?
...what handheld Mario game? NSMB released back in 2006. Although I might grant you it.

But no, I don't count the Paper Mario or Mario and Luigi games because they're RPGs
 
J-Rock said:
Can a proper gamer ignore this thread?
A proper gamer would never pass on the opportunity to argue about pointless gaming stuff like what you need to play to be a proper gamer.
 
The_Technomancer said:
I was curious to see if you were someone who enjoyed modern franchises that feature multiple bi-yearly installments, because I was going to ask what it was that kept them fresh for you. :P
The games you're playing hardly fall into that category, and I give props to you for it. Given what it appears you do enjoy playing I'm in agreement with you, or at least I understand you.

Not a problem! Like I said, I am sorry if I came across like an ass. Just weary of questions like that.

I am glad we agree!
 
kliklik said:
Well, I hate Tolstoy, but you kind of have to at least TRY to read something by him if you want to consider yourself knowledgeable about literature... especially if it's fiction, or russian literature.

At least read the Cliff's Notes.


picard-facepalm-1.jpg
 
outunderthestars said:
So you count the handheld uncharted but not the handheld mario games? Not counting the paper mario games either?

No.

Those Paper Mario games are RPGs - ie something completely different to standard Mario fare.

Your argument has gone from "Mario games are all the same" to "too many games with Mario."
 
outunderthestars said:
You actually have to be reading this via the Wii's web browser in order to be a proper gamer.


You have to be using a special homebrew browser made especially for the Gamecube's network adapter.
 
Chamber said:

1z4c1m0.jpg


Fixed. You forgot the monocle. We are talking about "proper" gamers after all.

tiff said:
What other requirements are there? I'd love to discover the exact point at which I'm officially no longer a gaming enthusiast.

Okay, back to the topic at hand. I would say a gaming enthusiast has played at least one of the metal gear solid games.

But I don't want to just list my opinions. I want to know what others think as well.
 
_Alkaline_ said:
Your argument has gone from "Mario games are all the same" to "too many games with Mario."
Which is certainly a decent argument, but one very different from the one originally propositioned.
 
Top Bottom