matthewwhatever
Member
Duffy's out of the news now because the trial is in recess at the moment. When it comes back in August -- with Harper's former chief of staff Nigel Wright on the stand -- it's probably going to be big news. Tempered a little by the fact people don't usually pay as much attention over the summer, but if he says anything explosive, it'll get picked up.
I see why Mulcair is acting so outraged about it, but as far as I can tell, it's really not that different from the In & Out stuff the Conservatives tried pulling. Of course, the advantage for the NDP is that people didn't care about the Conservatives bilking taxpayers out of money because it was all so convoluted -- it's not like the Senate spending, where you have pretty clear-cut cases of appointed people being outraged they have to eat cold cheese. Here it's, like, 50+ people being told to pay back various amounts because they spent office money on the wrong kinds of offices. I think it's a pretty dubious use of money that's supposed to be used in a non-partisan way, but I can see why most people would tune it out.
Also, re: the bolded, is there any issue you can't turn around into a discussion on PR? I want to see you do it with something really obscure, like supply management or something.
It's really up in the air at the moment. It wasn't a judicial or police procedure that found the NDP violated budget rules but a parliamentary board that is stacked with NDP opponents. Now the NDP is taking the case to the courts and I'll accept their judgement when it happens because the budget rules are pretty obtuse.
Either way though, rolling over and accepting the charges (which is for spending funds in the wrong places rather than theft) would allow the Conservatives and Liberals to paint the NDP as equally as corrupt as the other two large parties. A large part of the NDP's appeal is as an agent of change and this certainly would put a damper on that image. By vigorously denying it Mulcair has blunted that attack. It's good leadership.
The NDP has committed to PR electoral reform of the House of Commons, which would allow the PCs to come back as there is no more vote splitting and stable coalitions are required to govern which is also a moderating influence on government. That's way better than Trudeau's waffling on the issue. And it is not a Harper like policy at all.
I see why Mulcair is acting so outraged about it, but as far as I can tell, it's really not that different from the In & Out stuff the Conservatives tried pulling. Of course, the advantage for the NDP is that people didn't care about the Conservatives bilking taxpayers out of money because it was all so convoluted -- it's not like the Senate spending, where you have pretty clear-cut cases of appointed people being outraged they have to eat cold cheese. Here it's, like, 50+ people being told to pay back various amounts because they spent office money on the wrong kinds of offices. I think it's a pretty dubious use of money that's supposed to be used in a non-partisan way, but I can see why most people would tune it out.
Also, re: the bolded, is there any issue you can't turn around into a discussion on PR? I want to see you do it with something really obscure, like supply management or something.