• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

Walpurgis

Banned
No change. Voting system reform, no matter where it's done, is pretty much a one time deal for a long time. Either a new system sticks, or it gets rolled back to the old one and that's it for a generation. No where has a voting system been changed and, if people aren't happy with the new one, changed to a third system, it's always been back to the old system and that's the issue dead. The same would happen with any move to AV.

Add to that that there is a lot of misunderstanding, both genuine and malicious, that conflates AV/IRV with PR. It takes a little bit of digging into how the system works to realize that in the vast majority of cases the same damn people get elected and AV gives an unfair advantage to the same parties as FPTP (namely big tent and regional protest. Suffer the widely but shallowly supported Greens and PCs) . Not only is it a sham reform it's a sham reform that masquerades as real reform incredibly effectively.

This is my fear as well. I know that structural changes like this are very slow moving and take a long time to build up. If we blow our load on another bad system, it will be a very long time before we have the will built up to change it again. I actually didn't know that other countries went back to their old systems when their new ones turned out bad. Sounds like it's now or after I'm dead. For this reason, I will say that I would rather have a CPC minority than an LPC minority. I'm going to wash my tongue now.
Wait what did he say? I'm at work (and on the other side of the pacific).

It was mentioned earlier in the thread. I believe he said that he is against revoking citizenship for terrorists. Obviously, that's not a bad thing but when the idiots hear about it, they'll eat him alive.
 
Wait what did he say? I'm at work (and on the other side of the pacific).
in june or july, he carelessly said that Canadian terrorists should not lose their citezenship.


but FFW.

Trudeau is doing really good on today's debate. the bigger the crowd, the better he gets
 

mo60

Member
This debate seems to be way better than the last few debates.Trudeau's starting to break the munk debate rules now, but he's not as annoying as the last few debates.
 

lupinko

Member
in june or july, he carelessly said that Canadian terrorists should not lose their citezenship.


but FFW.

Trudeau is doing really good on today's debate. the bigger the crowd, the better he gets

I don't think they should lose their citizenship either. Life in prison with no parole is already the best punishment.

I don't see the US stripping their home grown terrorists of their citizenships, and they're the ones that Canada pokes the most fun at for throwing rights away, which is ironic in this case.

Saying Justin is wrong on that is supporting C-24 which again is a completely abhorrent law.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Can't watch right now but I can't wait when they bring up Saudi Arabia. Harper giving money to Muslims, if worded the right way, could hurt him.
 

lupinko

Member
Can't watch right now but I can't wait when they bring up Saudi Arabia. Harper giving money to Muslims, if worded the right way, could hurt him.

Yeah that is still dog-whistle hate politics that I don't approve of even though I am damn opposed to the Harper Government.
 

mo60

Member
Mulcair just ripped harper to shreds for talking about how the other political parties are using the refugee crisis for political points and trudeau just invoked Pierre Trudeau.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom