You Are Viewtiful
Member
Immature vote for Trudeau cause he's hot af
I want him to hold my face and blow his weed smoke onto me. 😍
Immature vote for Trudeau cause he's hot af
As a PLQ MNA, he protested about the high percentage of rejected ballots in his Riding rich in NO votes.
Today eh it doesn't matter anymore as NDP leader, "I recruit YES voters into my party and am okay with 50%+1 despite 5000 votes being rejected in my oldprovincial riding"
I want him to hold my face and blow his weed smoke onto me. 😍
This implies he wouldn't have accepted 50%+1 at the time (or whatever the required vote was in 1995), and the wiki article you posted doesn't really paint him in a bad light. He stood up for voters against perceived suppression. How that panders I'm not sure
That said, Mulcair as a provincial MNA was a staunch Federalist. And he faught to try to get a recount of the ballots that were rejected.
Fastfrowrd 20 years later today.... he for strategic reasons opens up his NDP tent to allow soft-nationalsits into his party and tries to pander to them by wanting to get rid of Stephane Dion's Clarity Act.
The Tom Mulcair of 20 years ago would be ashamed of the Tom Mulcair of today.
The Tom Mulcair of 20 years ago would be ashamed of the Tom Mulcair of today.
I tried to google the Clarity Act. If I'm reading the information correctly, it has to do with Quebec secession and, specifically, is there to make it harder for Quebec to secede, even if they were to vote for independence in a referendum. Is this a correct reading? The wording is very confusing. I guess all the other parties are in favour of the Clarity Act because they want to preserve the Union? So, why is NDP against it? Do they have strong support in Quebec which they want to preserve, or is it more for ideological reasons?
I personally find independence issues a lot less interesting than other ideological issues, so it seems silly to me that the parties can't agree to get rid of the conservatives (which sound awful) just because of this Quebec independence thing.
tbh BC could probably care less if Quebec separated so I'm pretty sure all this junk about the Clarity Act is not an election issue anywhere outside of Ontario.
Oh my god you're right. It's his eyes. His whites are the same colour as his skin so all that's left are dots.But what about Angry Smiling Sexy Tom?
Kinda reminds me of an animatronic bear on the smiling pic.
Some British Columbians, such as myself, would love to be able to vote to kick out Quebec - after collecting what they owe us, and dividing it up so that the parts of Quebec that want to stay in Canada can stay. We're tired of their separatist crap. Shit or get off the motherfucking pot already!
In before tag quote.
I think the NDP will make even more inroads in BC if they support the Cascadia movement then.
LOL, Parizeau was ready to leave the Mohawk reserves in CanadaI actually wouldn't mind if Quebec separated as long as Montreal, Laval, and Gatineau stayed, and the use of the Saint Lawrence river was free / available to Canada with no conditions.
Ontario should separate while the going is good. Once the drought really hits BC they'll be flying here for water handouts. Ain't no way. God put us here for a reason and he put you over there.
I don't think Quebec should separate. I think the ROC should stop being a bunch of whiners and learn French already. I hear a bunch of people saying "but Mandarin is more important!" yet they don't speak that either!
Here in Vancouver, BC the following languages are more important than French:
- Cantonese
- Mandarin
- Punjabi
- Korean
- Tagalog
- Vietnamese
- Farsi
Here in Vancouver, BC the following languages are more important than French:
- Cantonese
- Mandarin
- Punjabi
- Korean
- Tagalog
- Vietnamese
- Farsi
I don't particularly care about the topic but you can't mix statistics from different sources like that just cherry picking whatever numbers better support your position.http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11795-eng.htm
In all of BC, there are 296,000 speakers of French.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia#Ethnic_groups_and_languages
In all of BC, there are 342,000 speakers of "Chinese" (both Cantonese and Mandarin combined).
Here in Vancouver, BC the following languages are more important than French:
- Cantonese
- Mandarin
- Punjabi
- Korean
- Tagalog
- Vietnamese
- Farsi
I don't particularly care about the topic but you can't mix statistics from different sources like that just cherry picking whatever numbers better support your position.
The link you got your 342,000 (actually 342,920, nice rounding) speakers of Chinese from shows 54,745 speakers of French.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11795-eng.htm
In all of BC, there are 296,000 speakers of French.
One of the movements I support a lot are immersion schools. You get the gift of speaking two languages at a functional level.
Canadians being bilingual will only help us. As much as our ideas and cultural exchange takes place between other Angolophone countries, having more cultural exchanges with Francophone cultures can only enrich us a nation IMO.
*Although it should be noted that most the separatist movements I read about were very violent. Quebec's separatist movement is very unique in history in that it's entirely peaceful. Still though, I can't imagine Quebec separatism being good for Ontario's economy (the West will probably have an easier time). The two provinces rely so much on each other. Once those borders go up, there's no going back.
I only found out about this recently. I can't believe they don't teach this in school. I think it was inspired by other revolutions going on around the world at the time.1963-1969 - Front de libération du Québec (FLQ) starts a bombing campaign at the average rate of one every ten days. Targets included English owned businesses, banks, McGill University and the homes of prominent English speakers.
1963 FLQ bombing of Canadian Army Recruiting Centre in Montreal, killing Sgt. Wilfred V. O'Neil.
late 1960s - FLQ places a bomb in a window well of the National Defence Headquarters on Lisgar St in Ottawa, Ontario. The explosion killed a cleaning lady.
late 1960s - FLQ places a bomb in a mailbox next to the Canadian Tire store on Wellington St in Ottawa, Ontario.
February 13, 1969 - FLQ sets off a powerful bomb that rips through the Montreal Stock Exchange causing massive destruction and seriously injuring 27 people.
February 22, 1969 - FLQ terrorist bomb explodes at Liberal Party social club in Montreal, injuring two people.
October 5, 1970 - British diplomat James Cross and (on October 10) Quebec Minister of Labour Pierre Laporte are kidnapped by the FLQ in Montreal. (The dead body of Pierre Laporte was discovered in the trunk of a car in Montreal, Quebec on October 17, 1970, and the murderers were arrested on December 26, 1970; Cross was released on December 3, 1970.)
2000 - The Brigade d'autodéfense du français bombs a church where an English fundraiser was to be held.
2001 - Quebec - The FLQ/The Brigade d'autodéfense du français firebombs three "Second Cup" locations in Montreal. They were targeted because of the company's use of its incorporated English name "Second Cup". Rhéal Mathieu, a previously convicted FLQ terrorist was convicted for all three bombings. Seven McDonald's restaurants were also firebombed.
Quebec had a violent period, mostly in the 60s, with a group called the FLQ.
I only found out about this recently. I can't believe they don't teach this in school. I think it was inspired by other revolutions going on around the world at the time.
In my high school (Manitoba), we only had one Canadian history course which was taught in grade 11. We went from the early days in New France to WW1 with Arthur Curry and Vimy Ridge. We barely covered WWII and that was it. I remember getting sidetracked and reading ahead in the textbook. It covered the Korean War, the Cold War and I think that was it. FLQ was not mentioned at all in that book or in all my years of schooling.Really? My school definitely taught me about the FLQ crisis
I joined the wrestling team (For grade 9 and 10) and stuck with French to grade 12
Whoa
Really? My school definitely taught me about the FLQ crisis
The real reason, according to the Liberals, is because of differences in economic policy. Mulcair has publicly declared that he's open to a coalition with the Liberals if it means kicking Harper out.
The idea of the NDP's Sherbrooke declaration is that Quebec has the right to self-determination, and should be able to decide for itself on the numbers of majority (ie. 50% vs 60% vs ??) of the question of how it could extract itself from Canada. In contrast the Clarity Act supported by the Liberals states that the Federal Government controls the numbers aspect of the question by which Quebec could separate.
Quebec has supported the NDP approach (The Clarity Act has been rejected by both separatist and federalist parties in the Quebec National Assembly) and as a result the NDP have a large majority of seats in the province.
Yeah, that's exactly what the Clarity Act does. It probably wouldn't work (Canada would get slaughtered by the international community if it tried to deny a successful referendum), but the House shouldn't have that option anyway. It's kind of a nuclear option for hardcore federalists.Am I reading it right that this act reserves the right for the Canada House of Commons to be able to define after the fact what constitutes a true majority? So if Quebec votes 52 % in favour of independence they can just go lol, you need 60 %. Thats some bullshit if so.
You answered why there are 296,000 speakers of French, as well as the public school system having French as often the only option for language credits. I agree being bilingual is a good thing, I just don't agree with French being the language to be the official language anymore. Mandarin, Japanese, German, Spanish, and Portuguese (last two less about the European country and more about the Latin and South American countries) would all be more useful.
It would be a lot more useful in this modern age to have Mandarin immersion schools sponsored by the government.
Quebec had a violent period, mostly in the 60s, with a group called the FLQ.
I only found out about this recently. I can't believe they don't teach this in school. I think it was inspired by other revolutions going on around the world at the time.
.The FLQ was a major part of my Canadian history class in high school, so this rather surprises me.
I meant more that I was surprised it's not still univerally covered in Canadian history classes.
The violence perpetrated during October Crisis changed they way movements conduct themselves today
Thankfully, that violent period was very short lived.
.
Being violent was counter productive, even if a minority condone it; the majority of the independence movement conducts itself today in a peaceful manner by political means instead of force.
Today, that's all water under the bridge because the most violent anyone gets is probably a bar fight or two and it ends there.
Federally, it also shook the limits on how far the Federal Government can use military force at home; . The use of the War Measures Act caused everyone in Canada to question themselves on how far are they ready to go to cross the line between Law-&-Order into Martial Law
Does anyone know how close we are to free university? I think I read something about the NDP wanting that but it doesn't seem to be an election issue, so I don't feel like they would do it anytime soon. Where do the Liberals and Greens stand on it?
But what about Angry Smiling Sexy Tom?
Kinda reminds me of an animatronic bear on the smiling pic.
Wtf... Why would they do that? People are paying enough as it is. Corporations have more money. They should be paying way more than they are now. 13.5% is a joke.
It seems that the Liberals want to cut taxes for the middle class so I thought they would raise corporate taxes back to where they were before the Conservatives came to power.
They should just keep personal taxes the same and increase corporate taxes.
Education at all levels is a provincial jurisdiction, so the federal NDP can claim they're for it all they want -- that doesn't mean it's happening. Much like their minimum wage promise (which really only applies to less than 1% of the work), they can't suddenly start dictating provincial policies just because they're in power.
Mulcair should just never smile. It's unsettling at the very best of times. He should make peace with the fact he's no Layton, and embrace his inner Hulk.
Stephen Gordon, Economics Prof at the University of Laval: "The short-run effect of a corporate tax increase in revenues is surprisingly small (Chen and Mintz provide the references; see here for how they apply to Canada), and a good estimate for the long-run effect is zero."
Also from Gordon (drawing from lots and lots of other sources): "Theres little reason to think that increasing corporate tax rates will generate significant new revenues. The raw correlation between CIT rates and CIT revenues as a share of GDP is essentially zero, if not slightly negative."
As for raising income taxes for the wealthiest portion of the population, there's pretty ample evidence that raising taxes on people making $200k+ per year raises revenue in a way that doesn't negatively impact the economy.
Stephen Gordon, Economics Prof at the University of Laval: "The short-run effect of a corporate tax increase in revenues is surprisingly small (Chen and Mintz provide the references; see here for how they apply to Canada), and a good estimate for the long-run effect is zero."
Also from Gordon (drawing from lots and lots of other sources): "Theres little reason to think that increasing corporate tax rates will generate significant new revenues. The raw correlation between CIT rates and CIT revenues as a share of GDP is essentially zero, if not slightly negative."
As for raising income taxes for the wealthiest portion of the population, there's pretty ample evidence that raising taxes on people making $200k+ per year raises revenue in a way that doesn't negatively impact the economy.
I agree. To add, the real money maker that would make a significant difference is to change the capital gains tax structure. As of now, 50% of capital gains (and less for dividends for some reason) is taxed. Moving that higher to 65% would do wonders.
That is the biggest thing holding me back from potentially voting NDP this October. They seem too Quebec-centric and I don't blame them given where their majority of MPs are located.
Actually one thing I do regret from high school (besides not joining the high school Olympic wrestling team, our coach was Daniel Igali) was dropping French in Grade 9.
I ended up taking Japanese the rest of the way in high school (then Mandarin and German in college and Japanese again in university, though in Ontario I did take Italian in addition to French).
Anyway you may not think of it, but I'm proud of Canada's bilingualism, also for professionals and for business, French itself is still very important worldwide.
Why is Quebect independence still a topic to discuss now in 2015? It is dead and it should be buried in the history book. This is why western provinces get pissy with central Canada. Disproportionate attention is paid to Quebec that we feel are at the expense of western Canada.
That is the biggest thing holding me back from potentially voting NDP this October. They seem too Quebec-centric and I don't blame them given where their majority of MPs are located.
Going back to the discussion on race, the Liberals just tweeted these two images:
I totally disagree. Canada has two official languages. French and English. Deal with it.
The only other languages that should be taught and sponsored by the government are 1st Nations languages
Going back to the discussion on race, the Liberals just tweeted these two images:
I too regret dropping French in highschool... Until I remember how much I hated French in school. The problem with French in school is that it's all bullshit, they don't teach you how to hold a conversation in French and would rather focus on the technicalities of the language, which is complicated as it is.
I was in French immersion in grades 7 and 8, that should have been enough for me to being able to hold a conversation in French, but right now my French is basic at best.
.
Plus I really think the NDP position as well as Harper's motion to recognizer Quebeckers as a 'nation within' Canada' does a lot more to starve seperatists of their soft support than anything the Liberals have done. It dampens the flames while Liberals in Quebec seem to, inadvertently maybe, stoke it.