Seems like a solid bet. Him, Wilson-Raybould and Murray will be in Cabinet, at least; given the excellent Liberal results, probably they'll want somebody from further inland too.
I hope Dominic Leblanc becomes the Justice Minister.
That's a guy who will be his right hand man.
I think there's a pretty good chance he's Foreign Minister.
Liberals took over Ottawa except for Poilievre's riding which he almost lost too. Pretty much the ideal result within expectations. Im sad Paul Dewar lost though, that was a shock to me.
See this is the part of MMP that scares the bejesus out of me. I need somebody to explain how this isn't just going to turn into a layer of party cronyism.
Where is Trudeau on C-51? I remember him saying that it was a mistake to vote for it and that he only did so because he wanted to get Conservative voters or didn't want to look "not ready". Now that he has a majority, he can do whatever the hell he wants. But what does he want?
It was a lot of fun having Canada-GAF go nuts over this election. Why don't we have a dedicated thread of some sort? (Or do we hahaha)
Is there an English version?
In STV they all campaign. In MMP they all campaign as well because the only way they guarantee getting in in the next election is to win locally. If they don't win locally the only way they get in is if
1. Their party gets enough votes to go over a threshold
2. Their party does well enough in the party vote to deserve seats
3. Their party DIDN'T do well enough locally to get those deserved seats and so get top ups
4. They are high enough on their party's list to get one of those top ups(their ranking can even change in an open party list).
Every candidate that wants to get elected or re-elected wants to win locally as the other route is a roulette wheel. In this election for example no Liberal list only candidate would have made it in at all and only very few Conservative list candidates would have made it in. That's why in MMP places like Germany, NZ, Scotland etc. there's no difference in how 'list' MPs and 'local' MPs behave either in parliament or in a campaign. They all play towards a locality where they hope to get in the next time around.
A side benefit is that if you need help from an MP then in both STV and MMP you've got a choice of people to go to. You're not bound to the one guy who won your riding.
So canada elects a new prime minister and the headline for 24 is...
The US election
Wow.
iunderstoodthatreference.gifFrom an American: Congratulations Canada onpreserving your national igloogiving Harper the boot.
Semantics.
Conservatives 2011 = 5,835,270 votes
Liberals 2015 = 6,928,514 votes
A million votes difference.
Thanks for that! That's a lot of good info there.
So canada elects a new prime minister and the headline for 24 is...
The US election
Wow.
So canada elects a new prime minister and the headline for 24 is...
The US election
Wow.
Is there an English version?
Yeah it's definitely an obscure side of how MMP works. You would think that 'list' MPs and 'local' MPs would act completely differently but that's just not what happens in places that use the system There's a big ass paper that studied why list and local MPs act the same if you want me to PM you the link (I summarised the findings in my post though. It's very straightforward self-preservation).
must be awkward for all those newspapers that endorsed the Conservatives just last week
Joe Oliver was so salty on cbc radio this morning. Was great.
Joe Oliver was so salty on cbc radio this morning. Was great.
I hope there's an archive.
I just realized...
June 2014: Hudak gone.
October 2014: Ford gone.
October 2015: Harper gone.
It's been an amazing year politically if you're in Toronto.
Hudak should have been committed to an asylum. Truly one of the worst politicians in Canadian history, and that includes the Ford Bros. Ford may have smoked crack, but the damage Hudak was crazy to think about.
The PCs in Ontario have (totally bizarrely) decided that their problem is that they haven't been sufficiently similar to Mike Harris.
Yeah, the Ontario Conservatives are a mess and picking leaders crazier than the last isn't going to help. They might as well drop the "Progressive" from their name because they keep going father and farther away from it, like they somehow think that's what people want.
But hey, it's kept them out of power for 12 years and counting so it's not all bad. We can only hope the federal Cons are just as clueless and oblivious.
The Liberals know more than anyone else that they only won a majority because of Harper. It benefits them in future elections to implement voting reform. It was also part of their platform. I don't know why it's even an argument.
We can only hope that they pick another horrible leader. A Ford perhaps.
Niqabyou know what is messed up? Conservatives lost seats in every Province but Quebec where he doubled his seat count
Will indeed be weird watching a Jays playoff game with 0 election ads. I forgot what life felt like pre-elxn42Canadian television is going to be so weird tonight, I forgot what regular commercials looked like.
Those are good points supporting why the Liberals are incentivized to enact voting reform, but come on it's clear why people are skeptical.
The Liberals have massively gained under the current system, and it will be very attractive to continue on the same course in the future. There will be Liberal MPs and strategists that will believe that they can continue to win big against the Conservatives and NDP and will advocate for no changes. This will be especially true if the Conservatives go through a lengthly leadership process and are weakened afterward.
The Liberals just won a big majority from just 39% of the vote. Any changes to the voting system are likely to cost brand new Liberal MPs their seats and there will be a lot of pressure from MPs against changes that would result in this.
It will be enormously enticing to enact preferential voting, which would stack the deck in the Liberals' favour, but doesn't yield proportional representation.
If Trudeau enacts MMP during this term he is a saint.
Some Conservative party strategist was saying on the CBC this morning that the Liberal government doesn't plan on undoing much of what the Conservatives did. That seems... untrue?
He was also saying that they did a lot for climate change -- his one tangible example was changing light bulbs. No joke.
Niqab
Even preferential voting would be a massive improvement.
I would prefer PR but being able to (this election) do
- Green
- Liberal
would at least mark my support for the Greens and show all parties that there are a lot of people that like their platform.
I would prefer PR but being able to (this election) do
- Green
- Liberal
would at least mark my support for the Greens and show all parties that there are a lot of people that like their platform.
And when everyone else around goes
1. Liberal
2. ______
3. ______
1. NDP
2. Liberal
1. Conservative
2. Liberal
The Liberals get a huge majority and the Greens get shit all. Terrible voting system.
I would prefer PR but being able to (this election) do
- Green
- Liberal
would at least mark my support for the Greens and show all parties that there are a lot of people that like their platform.
I was actually talking to a person from Quebec about that. It's sad that to win rural Quebecois votes you just have to be a racist piece of shit...
And when everyone else around goes
1. Liberal
2. ______
3. ______
1. NDP
2. Liberal
1. Conservative
2. Liberal
The Liberals get a huge majority and the Greens get shit all. Terrible voting system.