Canello landed the better punches? Fuck off.
You can argue against that?
I had GGG winning, but I'd say the 10 absolute best landed punches in that fight were thrown by Canelo.
Canello landed the better punches? Fuck off.
Completely missing my point. I disagree with that one card just as much as anyone. All I'm saying is that even if that card was much closer (but still in favor of Alvarez) then the outcome would had still been a draw. So no reason to go berzerk for that one card as far as the actual outcome is concerned.
Armchair judges posting that canelo won this ez? Lololol
Extra cheese toast fam. We in!!All you can eat, on the house!
When you prefer a fighter over another, it's easy to look for "ways" for them to win rounds on your card.
Or you know you maybe we understand the sport better. I love both fighters and it's beyond obvious that GGG won. Didn't just win he dominated. Again the worse case is 7-5 for GGG.
Next fight won't be in Vegas and GGG - now aware of what Canelo actually offers up will crush him.
Or you know you maybe we understand the sport better. I love both fighters and it's beyond obvious that GGG won. Didn't just win he dominated. Again the worse case is 7-5 for GGG.
Next fight won't be in Vegas and GGG - now aware of what Canelo actually offers up will crush him.
Thanks for the calm reply. I'm not going beserk. Yes the final outcome is a draw.The scoring should reflect that in some fashion. Even as an Alvarez fan you have to admit that that score is suspect.
I was an Olympic boxer...
And , other that outlandish scorecard from the first judge, Actually does that. The second judge had GGG winning by only 2 points and the third was a plain draw. The mismatch is meaningless even if Canelo had won by one point only. The outrage is more fishy than the scorecard honestly.
Now show the next literal second with gggs fists in canelos mouth. He hit him, but he didn't slow ggg down. It's boxing.
I mean, volume doesn't mean everything but he landed 4 more power punches. The fight was a lot closer in terms of power/damaging shots than people want to believe. Canelo was backing up a lot, yes, but he was also exchanging.
I was an Olympic boxer...
Or you know you maybe we understand the sport better. I love both fighters and it's beyond obvious that GGG won. Didn't just win he dominated. Again the worse case is 7-5 for GGG.
Next fight won't be in Vegas and GGG - now aware of what Canelo actually offers up will crush him.
Doesn't matter. A damaged fighter is always dangerous, they have no other choice. Ggg dominated the fight and took Canelos best shot and didn't care. A part 2 would of happened without that shit card.
You can't say 7-5 is acceptable, while saying GGG dominated.
Just admit that the fight was super close.
No one would be fuming if Byrd scored it 7-5 for Canelo.
Now show the next literal second with gggs fists in canelos mouth. He hit him, but he didn't slow ggg down. It's boxing.
For real? What brand do you recommend for wraps. I've just been using the Mexican ones. But want to get washables. Same with gloves.. I hear avoid everlast..?
A punch doesn't suddenly not count just because a guy walks through it. It's not like GGG hurt Canelo either. If you are using that metric that's even more reason to call it close/draw.
Maybe, maybe not.It actually is not, because the score is so lopsided in it scoring. That it's an issue of bias or incompetence.
Canelo took GGG's best shot as well. What exactly is your point? I mean, if you honestly think GGG dominated I don't know what to tell you.
Canelo's eyes/cheekbones were swollen afsee both of their faces, canelo had basically nothing while ggg did have bruises.
He did dominate. What's your point?
I'm not saying it doesn't count they all count. But there's context here. I think canelos weight gain slowed him down for doing it the first time in his career. Ggg didn't hurt canelo, but this fight was vastly more technical than I think all hoped. After a while it was clear canelo gassed out. That's why I give it to ggg. He had better cardio and stamina, and skill in this one. My money was on canelo.
He did dominate. What's your point?
Canelo's eyes/cheekbones were swollen af
He didn't, the first half was canelo winning. Made ggg miss and landed cleaner punches including power punches.
Maybe, maybe not.
Incompetence i can agree. Bias? Come on being so loopsided will make it so obvious.
The thing here is that even by one point favoring Canelo it wouldn't make any difference, why nobody is talking shit about the draw scorecard if Golovkin won by such a landslide according to some of you.
He landed the more flashiest punches.Canello landed the better punches? Fuck off.
I think cardio did have an effect, and it did absolutely affect Canelo in some of the middle rounds, but he won the final 3 on all the judges scorecards, so he seemingly recovered somewhat. GGG won a lot of the middle rounds big, but they were just individual rounds. They weren't 10-8. They counted the same as the rounds Canelo won. I think some people underestimate how close a fight like this can be when it comes to scoring. Even if you had it 8-4 GGG, or 7-5 GGG, in a fight where some of the rounds were fairly close, all you need is a couple of rounds to be scored the other way and all of a sudden that's a draw. The margin for a fight like this to go from a win for one guy, to a draw or a win for the other guy, is incredibly small.
Cool. If you keep saying it maybe it'll come true.
He landed the more flashiest punches.
I can't tell if you're defending that score or not.
I think cardio did have an effect, and it did absolutely affect Canelo in some of the middle rounds, but he won the final 3 on all the judges scorecards, so he seemingly recovered somewhat. GGG won a lot of the middle rounds big, but they were just individual rounds. They weren't 10-8. They counted the same as the rounds Canelo won. I think some people underestimate how close a fight like this can be when it comes to scoring. Even if you had it 8-4 GGG, or 7-5 GGG, in a fight where some of the rounds were fairly close, all you need is a couple of rounds to be scored the other way and all of a sudden that's a draw. The margin for a fight like this to go from a win for one guy, to a draw or a win for the other guy, is incredibly small.
Cool. If you keep saying it maybe it'll come true.
I think cardio did have an effect, and it did absolutely affect Canelo in some of the middle rounds, but he won the final 3 on all the judges scorecards, so he seemingly recovered somewhat. GGG won a lot of the middle rounds big, but they were just individual rounds. They weren't 10-8. They counted the same as the rounds Canelo won. I think some people underestimate how close a fight like this can be when it comes to scoring. Even if you had it 8-4 GGG, or 7-5 GGG, in a fight where some of the rounds were fairly close, all you need is a couple of rounds to be scored the other way and all of a sudden that's a draw. The margin for a fight like this to go from a win for one guy, to a draw or a win for the other guy, is incredibly small.
Cool. If you keep saying it maybe it'll come true.
I can't tell if you're defending that score or not.
And what does that mean? I boxed as well doesn't mean shit. Let's see what happens in the rematch.
He's not. He is saying Byrd thought Canelo won the fight. How much he won the fight by at that point becomes irrelevant. The end result would have been the same: A draw.
Dude says he was an Olympic boxer.
It means he most likely much more well versed than someone who simply "boxed as well".
C'mon now.
But yes. Let's see a rematch.
Scooter you agree with the bullshit card?
I had it close for GGG. Because it was that close, and because of the nature of close fights and how they can be scored/what judges might look for in awarding a winner, I don't think a draw is outlandish. I don't see how you can arrive at 118-110 Canelo, but some of the rounds were so close for me that I could easily see some of the ones I gave to Gennady going to Canelo. Not everything is a robbery.
Answer the question man. It's bullshit.