The last time Snyder co-wrote something... We all know what happened.
To be fair... I did enjoy watching 300: Rise of an Empire.
The last time Snyder co-wrote something... We all know what happened.
To be fair... I did enjoy watching 300: Rise of an Empire.
Some fans have spent so much time following these continuities that they just can't fathom someone new being able to understand it without doing homework.
I'd say the aesthetics is half the battle with most fans. Once you get the look right, the voices right, and an accurate vibe or atmosphere to that of the comic pages, fans will appreciate it whereas someone else might not care or get it.Maybe because his movies aren't all that good? Or are "actual fans" not supposed to care about that and only fixate on what the costumes look like?
Yeah...if Cap2 turns out to be really good and box office hit, it's BvS that will end up moving.
I'd say the aesthetics is half the battle with most fans. Once you get the look right, the voices right, and an accurate vibe or atmosphere to that of the comic pages, fans will appreciate it whereas someone else might not care or get it.
Despite being the most critically acclaimed set of comic films ever, the Nolan trilogy has harsh criticism among fans, all stemming from his vision of realism over staying true to the source material. Some fans think Batman's voice is dumb, should be more like Conroy. Most fans agree that Nolan's Gotham sucks (especially in the sequels), it's just a real life city with no originality or fantasy. Pretty much everyone agrees that the fight choreography is bad.
As evidenced by 300, Watchmen, and Man of Steel, Snyder will fix all this and then some. For the most part, as a fan, watching the source material come to life is all I want out of comic book movies.
My point was that getting all that right greatly improves the quality of the movie from a fan's perspective. How doesn't that make sense?Yeah, this is completely absurd. You're entitled to what you do and don't want out of these of movies of course, but the idea that comic book accuracy in these movies is more important than quality kind of undermines the whole conceit of the genre.
I'd say the aesthetics is half the battle with most fans. Once you get the look right, the voices right, and an accurate vibe or atmosphere to that of the comic pages, fans will appreciate it whereas someone else might not care or get it.
Despite being the most critically acclaimed set of comic films ever, the Nolan trilogy has harsh criticism among fans, all stemming from his vision of realism over staying true to the source material. Some fans think Batman's voice is dumb, should be more like Conroy. Most fans agree that Nolan's Gotham sucks (especially in the sequels), it's just a real life city with no originality or fantasy. Pretty much everyone agrees that the fight choreography is bad.
As evidenced by 300, Watchmen, and Man of Steel, Snyder will fix all this and then some. For the most part, as a fan, watching the source material come to life is all I want out of comic book movies.
Understood. An impressive Gotham and better action scenes would've made the whole series more fun.The Nolan movies as amazing as they are just are seriously lacking in the fun department.
Begins is still my favorite because it had the quality and the fun that was lacking in TDK.
The Nolan movies as amazing as they are just are seriously lacking in the fun department.
Begins is still my favorite because it had the quality and the fun that was lacking in TDK.
The Nolan movies as amazing as they are just are seriously lacking in the fun department.
Begins is still my favorite because it had the quality and the fun that was lacking in TDK.
While the film kinda dropped once the boat scene started, that whole joker interrogation scene leading up to Rachel's death was the best thing about the trilogy
Nothing in mcu films or man of steel was as exciting as that was in theatres.
Feige has said that they won't budge. How embarrassing would it be if WB did?
My point was that getting all that right greatly improves the quality of the movie from a fan's perspective. How doesn't that make sense?
It'll get killed if it doesn't move...$180m ow vs $60m ow.
It'll move up if anything.The trainwreck will be delayed. Mark my words.
Because Snyder is a mediocre to bad director, so him nailing the aesthetics is kind of a hollow victory if, like, the storytelling itself isn't up to par.
Also, I think your argument applies more to a niche group of fans, than superhero fans as a whole. I mean, I'm a fan too and I'm totally cool with the movies taking liberties if it's for the better. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. Either way, I, as a fan, don't think that accuracy should take priority over the strength of the talent involved.
I was just thinking this.
Didn't Thor 2 perform a little worse than the original?
No it actually made over 200 million more worldwide.
Nope...Am I the only one that thought MoS was great? I was expecting a summer action flick that I was hoping would be light on origin story and big on crazy action, and that's what I got.
I thought it was drab and dull. The best part was seeing Elliot Stabler joining the army after he left SVU.Am I the only one that thought MoS was great? I was expecting a summer action flick that I was hoping would be light on origin story and big on crazy action, and that's what I got.
I thought it was drab and dull. The best part was seeing Elliot Stabler joining the army after he left SVU.
I would say MoS is one of the worst superhero movies I've seen in recent memory. It's not as bad as Green Lantern but it was bad. An ugly, dull, sterile, boring film with no personality. That is the opposite of what Superman should be.
man of steel was a mess. but it had it's moments. would put it above marvel movies not named iron man 1/3 or avengers.
I thought it was drab and dull.
And TDK had the tension that was lacking in begins
While the film kinda dropped once the boat scene started, that whole joker interrogation scene leading up to Rachel's death was the best thing about the trilogy
Nothing in mcu films or man of steel was as exciting as that was in theatres.
My biggest gripe with Nolan's Batman is that i don't care one bit about Batman. The Joker overshadowed him hard in TDK and he was incredibly bland in TDKR, heck he was gone for like half the movie. He was almost the least interesting character in that series.
(to be fair, I haven't watched Begins in a while )
So what does this mean for Thor 3? In 2017/2018? A Doctor Strange movie rumored for 2016 right?
The rumor is either Doctor Strange or Guardians of the Galaxy 2 in July 2016. Guardians 2 was even rumored for May before the Cap announcement, as they'll probably do a Guardians sequel before Avengers 3 to set up THE GAUNTLET
Too bad Snyder can't direct actors.
Too bad Snyder can't direct actors.
Why do some people keep acting as if MoS was a flop?.
Cavill is fine. Affleck is fine.
Zuckerberg is a strange choice but if they go the self made young billionaire it may work.
The movie is hated critically
MoS wasn't a flop but it wasn't a success once you start looking at the budget.
The movie is hated critically and with all the PR and timing, should of hit 700-750 million.
I am sorry but MoS was worse than Thor 1 and Cap 1.
Most people agree as well as shown by RT/MC.
MoS wasn't a flop but it wasn't a success once you start looking at the budget.
The movie is hated critically and with all the PR and timing, should of hit 700-750 million.
I am sorry but MoS was worse than Thor 1 and Cap 1.
Most people agree as well as shown by RT/MC.
Last I checked the score was failing in school.
That's not how this works. Nor is it how Rotten Tomatoes works. Nor is it what you initially said in the first place.
You're not even good at defending the narrative you've chosen to promote![]()
I am sorry but MoS was worse than Thor 1 and Cap 1.