Broken Joystick
At least you can talk. Who are you?
You think you can fool me?! I'm on mobile, I see thumbnails. I see everything.
God damn it.
You think you can fool me?! I'm on mobile, I see thumbnails. I see everything.
God damn it.
I was thinking about this too. it's such a perfect reveal they need it to be in CWCoulson being alive is also a great way to breed distrust in Civil War, so it works.
Plus it looks like a TV show.Celery Man? Wow Marvel is running out of ideas. Who'd watch a movie about a man made out of celery? This is gonna bomb. The age of Marvel is over.
Whedon had his time, glad to see we are done with that. If Avengers 2 was him perfecting the first one, I definitely don't want a 3rd.
first off, that's subjective and second, if it really sucked and that was the consensus, I doubt they would decide to adapt it.The Civil War comic sucks, who cares about doing it justice? They should just be concerned with doing it better.
we don't know much about the film other than the fact that it is named after a major story in the comics with iron man, captain america, and spiderman as the main characters. it wasn't just a captain america story, it was a crossover story.It's called Captain America: Civil War because it's written predominantly as Cap's story. Other Avengers being in it doesn't make it an Avengers story, they just fill out the supporting cast, much like SHIELD fills out the supporting cast in Winter Soldier.
well, not everyone that article was stupid. and i know how this has always been talked about as a cap centric story, but with that, one has to wonder why there is so much stipulation with downey's involvement with the film.That Forbes article is stupid because it's always been talked about as a Cap-centric story with appearances from various other MCU characters.
again, this is a double edged sword. if they aren't going to have major roles, then it seems like the adaptation won't give the source material justice, because they are supposed to be major players here.The unwarranted assumption that just because they are appearing they will take part in some sort of earthspanning Avengers-esque war is what's clouding people's opinions. And there's not much to do when people are jumping to conclusions that every role is a major one despite reiterating what it is going to be like.
God damn it.
Is it safe to say that the first teaser will come with Star Wars? Or wa something already announced?
I always see these gifs appear in Rudd topics but I've never thought about asking where they even come from. They're amazing.
So's Scarlet Witch:
So some minor speculation/rumour here about these set photos we're seeing:Apparently this is Nigeria and Crossbones shows up to fuck up Caps day, the New Avengers do their stuff but loads of innocent bystanders die in the process, seemingly setting up government registration and all that with Stark on one side, Cap the other. But if that's true then it's a bit strange that it's taken so long for government to react after Hulk broke harlem and probably killed a few people in South Africa, and New York.
first off, that's subjective and second, if it really sucked and that was the consensus, I doubt they would decide to adapt it.
we don't know much about the film other than the fact that it is named after a major story in the comics with iron man, captain america, and spiderman as the main characters. it wasn't just a captain america story, it was a crossover story.
well, not everyone that article was stupid. and i know how this has always been talked about as a cap centric story, but with that, one has to wonder why there is so much stipulation with downey's involvement with the film.
again, this is a double edged sword. if they aren't going to have major roles, then it seems like the adaptation won't give the source material justice, because they are supposed to be major players here.
in fact, several years ago before av2 was announced to be age of ultron, there were rumors that av2 was going to be thanos and that av3 was going to be the civil war.
Fun Fact: Joss Whedon wasn't a big fan of the Russos reviving Bucky for Winter Soldier (same applies to the comics).
P
So's Scarlet Witch:
His Asssource?
NEW CHALLENGER APPROACHING
I hate to be that guy but wow, she got old quick. She looks like she's in her mid 30's.
NEW CHALLENGER APPROACHING
Fun Fact: Joss Whedon wasn't a big fan of the Russos reviving Bucky for Winter Soldier (same applies to the comics).
I hate to be that guy but wow, she got old quick. She looks like she's in her mid 30's.
That explains the half-assed allusion to Winter Soldier in AOU. 'The leads went cold.'
There were enough characters in Ultron without adding another one. Hopfully he'll be given a good deal of screen time in Civil War.
There were enough characters in Ultron without adding another one. Hopfully he'll be given a good deal of screen time in Civil War.
Hey guys, not everything is a spoiler.So some minor speculation/rumour here about these set photos we're seeing:Apparently this is Nigeria and Crossbones shows up to fuck up Caps day, the New Avengers do their stuff but loads of innocent bystanders die in the process, seemingly setting up government registration and all that with Stark on one side, Cap the other. But if that's true then it's a bit strange that it's taken so long for government to react after Hulk broke harlem and probably killed a few people in South Africa, and New York.
first off, that's subjective and second, if it really sucked and that was the consensus, I doubt they would decide to adapt it.
we don't know much about the film other than the fact that it is named after a major story in the comics with iron man, captain america, and spiderman as the main characters. it wasn't just a captain america story, it was a crossover story.
well, not everyone that article was stupid. and i know how this has always been talked about as a cap centric story, but with that, one has to wonder why there is so much stipulation with downey's involvement with the film.
in fact, several years ago before av2 was announced to be age of ultron, there were rumors that av2 was going to be thanos and that av3 was going to be the civil war.
The speculation is right from the story blurb in the OP though...
"After another international incident involving the Avengers results in collateral damage, political pressure mounts to install a system of accountability and a governing body to determine when to enlist the services of the team."
Hey guys, not everything is a spoiler.
NEW CHALLENGER APPROACHING
I was spoilering more where it takes place and what's happening in case anyone wonders in accidentally/doesn't want to know. Even though they'd see the pictures...I don't know, some people are sensitive in regards to spoilers, I'm just try to be fair
Where is this from exactly? Cause when I was reading the Post-Annihilation stuff Nova is contacted by Tony about joining his cause and Richard was all "thank you sir I'll think about it" etc. I was waiting for this epic verbal smackdown to happen but it never came.
I wasn't talking about spoilers, I'm just saying that the Avengers being involved in an international incident which sparks off the registration act is pretty much confirmed. It's not speculation. As to why the Hulk wrecking a busy South African city district isn't enough, it's probably because even though all the films are connected, the individual filmmakers want their own movies to somewhat stand alone for the main narrative. So while a number of incidents led up to the world governments says "enough is enough", the final straw has to be in the Civil War movie itself so audience can have a better understanding of the context.
I wasn't talking about spoilers, I'm just saying that the Avengers being involved in an international incident which sparks off the registration act is pretty much confirmed. It's not speculation. As to why the Hulk wrecking a busy South African city district isn't enough, it's probably because even though all the films are connected, the individual filmmakers want their own movies to somewhat stand alone for the main narrative. So while a number of incidents led up to the world governments says "enough is enough", the final straw has to be in the Civil War movie itself so audience can have a better understanding of the context.
It could be that Ross is brought into be involved with the Avengers as a result of Hulk's rampage in South Africa.
errrr
I was thinking something similar but isn't he supposed to be in Ant-Man? I imagine we'll learn more there first.
Its rumoured but not confirmed that Ross is in Ant-Man
You don't need to include Bucky. Just have a second, brief scene where Thor tells Cap that his 'friend' eludes Heimdall's gaze. Presto. Shows Cap trusts Thor, shows Bucky is in deep cover, and sets up that people are looking for him and it's not a case of 'meh, we'll deal with this guy later.'
That probably means that even if he is in it, it's a tiny cameo role at best.
You don't need to include Bucky. Just have a second, brief scene where Thor tells Cap that his 'friend' eludes Heimdall's gaze. Presto. Shows Cap trusts Thor, shows Bucky is in deep cover, and sets up that people are looking for him and it's not a case of 'meh, we'll deal with this guy later.'
Maybe Heimdall could mark it on a map. Maybe he knows the apartment address, maybe even the buzzer number.
Maybe he is able but there is not a single need for the movie that Heimdall looks for Bucky.Dude was creeping on Jane from Asgard on Thor's request, and knew she was looking for Thor. I think it's fair to say he'd be able to approximate an idea of where Bucky was.