Netherscourge
Banned
$300 billion for the Wall of Trump!
Josh Marshall
@joshtpm
"The new plan is good. It's going to be inexpensive. It's going to be much better for the people at the bottom." Donald Trump. 2/18/16
3:29pm · 13 Mar 2017 · Twitter Web Client
Amazing how many people still buy his bullshit.
So... the desired increase in Pentagon spending is nearly twice the projected annual savings with this, at the cost of driving millions of people away from health insurance.
Definitely gonna call it Trumpcare going forward. His name must stick to this.
-So, this 'savings' will go to support SS and Medicare long-term, right?
-Right?
-Right?
Josh Marshall
@joshtpm
"The new plan is good. It's going to be inexpensive. It's going to be much better for the people at the bottom." Donald Trump. 2/18/16
3:29pm · 13 Mar 2017 · Twitter Web Client
Amazing how many people still buy his bullshit.
.
Hahahahahahahaha, we're gonna die.
It might be the only way the GOP loses the election. It's tempting to just say that they should pass this so it slaps all these Republicans voters, but many people will die. Many more will get sick and get bankrupt. It's a very sad situation.
Those old Trump voters will have it rough.
2018 midterms are gonna be a bloodbath if this shit passes.
Why I hate this country in a nutshell.
They are not. A significant number of healthy people do not want to pay for healthcare. Yes it is stupid but they feel like they are paying to carry the sick. Now they don't have to worry about paying a penalty. Unfortunately for insurance to work you need healthy or low risk individuals to join and pay. Also, as they age and have families they will need insurance and coverage but their shortsightedness will cost millions their coverage now.
And then they came for you, Trump voters.
Those old Trump voters will have it rough.
2018 midterms are gonna be a bloodbath if this shit passes.
It would "help" people by giving them "freedom."Let's say the GOP really believes this plan helps Americans, where is there actual evidence to back it up now that the CBO score is out?
Like, do they govern base on evidence or fact? At all?
His supporters will be fine with this. Because they don't think they are the 14-24 million people.
I don't think people realize how inconsequential 30 billion a year is.
The fact that Ryan is willing to take away healthcare for 14 million people over that amount is asinine.
I can't keep up. Did people vote for Trump because they have economic anxiety or because they want economic anxiety?
And then they came for you, Trump voters.
So... A savings of 30 billion a year if I'm reading that right?
Hardly seems worth taking away healthcare for millions of people, but since they're poor... They're barely people at all. Right, GOP?
Sounds like it's working as plan. Obamacare and those 23 million gaining insurance angered so much of America that them all losing it seems to be what they wanted.
I don't think people realize how inconsequential 30 billion a year is.
The fact that Ryan is willing to take away healthcare for 14 million people over that amount is asinine.
Okay, so reading through the scoring, the only reason the premiums might go down by 2026 is the insurance companies can offer plans that offer much less health care coverage and less older, sicker poor people could afford insurance.
So... A savings of 30 billion a year if I'm reading that right?
Hardly seems worth taking away healthcare for millions of people, but since they're poor... They're barely people at all. Right, GOP?
Paul Krugman‏
@paulkrugman
Important to have a sense of scale on CBO numbers. $337 billion is small -- GDP should sum to around $230 TRILLION over that period
Yeah, that's how the racket seems to go. If Americans want affordable health care, all they have to do is be healthy enough to not need it.
So if these people don't pay into health care it will rise for the people still using it right?
So they do take away health insurance from poor people because they will not be able to pay for it? Or is the american goverment covering it otherwise to keep insurance fees at a stable rate?