The Oklahoma State model is actually not a bad counterpoint: you guys have had a revolving door of offensive coordinators but every time a new guy is brought in the system stays the same. If Tech had just been hiring new DCs that run the same scheme the last one did, even if the annual spectacular flameouts had gone on unabated we'd be in a much better position right now.
The big turning point was when we hired Holgorsen and then continued the same system with Monken. That's a big reason why I think we'll stick with Garman the rest of the year as long as he isn't terrible. Virtually every QB we recruit now is a pocket passer. Our true freshman, Mason Rudolph, has a chance to be special from what I've seen and heard.
Hopefully he's able to redshirt and we don't repeat the whole Wes Lunt debacle.
Tech is still a pretty good team right now IMO if the games stay close. The problem is that if the opponent has a running game with any pulse at all it will only take a two score lead for them to essentially put the game away completely. Look at the Arkansas game and see how competitive it was until Tech threw a pick to set up Arky's two score lead, at which point it was basically completely over despite all the time left on the clock.
I'm curious to see how our O-line does against Tech's D. I know you think that's a silly question, but we've had trouble pushing defensive linemen off the line of scrimmage, even against UTSA.
Not sure that we'll see the kind of inevitable improvement in OL play that we saw every year with Wickline as our OL coach.
Also doesn't help that Webb has somehow regressed from his true freshman year despite now being the unquestioned starter and no longer splitting any reps.
It still seems crazy to me that KK didn't do more to keep Mayfield around.